research

Cancer modelling: Getting to the heart of the problem

Abstract

Paradoxically, improvements in healthcare that have enhanced the life expectancy of humans in the Western world have, indirectly, increased the prevalence of certain types of cancer such as prostate and breast. It remains unclear whether this phenomenon should be attributed to the ageing process itself or the cumulative effect of prolonged exposure to harmful environmental stimuli such as ultraviolet light, radiation and carcinogens (Franks and Teich, 1988). Equally, there is also compelling evidence that certain genetic abnormalities can predispose individuals to specific cancers (Ilyas et al., 1999). The variety of factors that have been implicated in the development of solid tumours stems, to a large extent, from the fact that ‘cancer’ is a generic term, often used to characterize a series of disorders that share common features. At this generic level of description, cancer may be viewed as a cellular disease in which controls that usually regulate growth and maintain homeostasis are disrupted. Cancer is typically initiated by genetic mutations that lead to enhanced mitosis of a cell lineage and the formation of an avascular tumour. Since it receives nutrients by diffusion from the surrounding tissue, the size of an avascular tumour is limited to several millimeters in diameter. Further growth relies on the tumour acquiring the ability to stimulate the ingrowth of a new, circulating blood supply from the host vasculature via a process termed angiogenesis (Folkman, 1974). Once vascularised, the tumour has access to a vast nutrient source and rapid growth ensues. Further, tumour fragments that break away from the primary tumour, on entering the vasculature, may be transported to other organs in which they may establish secondary tumours or metastases that further compromise the host. Invasion is another key feature of solid tumours whereby contact with the tissue stimulates the production of enzymes that digest the tissue, liberating space into which the tumour cells migrate. Thus, cancer is a complex, multiscale process. The spatial scales of interest range from the subcellular level, to the cellular and macroscopic (or tissue) levels while the timescales may vary from seconds (or less) for signal transduction pathways to months for tumour doubling times The variety of phenomena involved, the range of spatial and temporal scales over which they act and the complex way in which they are inter-related mean that the development of realistic theoretical models of solid tumour growth is extremely challenging. While there is now a large literature focused on modelling solid tumour growth (for a review, see, for example, Preziosi, 2003), existing models typically focus on a single spatial scale and, as a result, are unable to address the fundamental problem of how phenomena at different scales are coupled or to combine, in a systematic manner, data from the various scales. In this article, a theoretical framework will be presented that is capable of integrating a hierarchy of processes occurring at different scales into a detailed model of solid tumour growth (Alarcon et al., 2004). The model is formulated as a hybrid cellular automaton and contains interlinked elements that describe processes at each spatial scale: progress through the cell cycle and the production of proteins that stimulate angiogenesis are accounted for at the subcellular level; cell-cell interactions are treated at the cellular level; and, at the tissue scale, attention focuses on the vascular network whose structure adapts in response to blood flow and angiogenic factors produced at the subcellular level. Further coupling between the different spatial scales arises from the transport of blood-borne oxygen into the tissue and its uptake at the cellular level. Model simulations will be presented to illustrate the effect that spatial heterogeneity induced by blood flow through the vascular network has on the tumour’s growth dynamics and explain how the model may be used to compare the efficacy of different anti-cancer treatment protocols

    Similar works