The objective of this paper is to compare the time specification performance between conventional controller and artificial intelligence controller in position control system of a DC motor. This will include design and development of a GUI software using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 for position control system experiment. The scope of this research is to apply direct digital control technique in position control system. Two types of controller namely PID and fuzzy logic controller will be used to control the output response. An interactive software will be developed to visualize and analyze the system. This project consists of hardware equipment and software design. The hardware parts involve in interfacing MS150 Modular servo System and Data Acquisition System with a personal computer. The software part includes programming real-time software using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0. Finally, the software will be integrated with hardware to produce a GUI position control system

Md. Ghazaly, Mariam

Rahmat, Mohd Fua'ad

Jurnal Teknologi

English

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository

PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZYLOGIC CONTROLLER IN POSITION CONTROLSYSTEM OF DC SERVOMOTORMOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT1  & MARIAM MD GHAZALY2Abstract.   The objective of this paper  is to compare the time specification performancebetween conventional controller and artificial  intelligence controller in position controlsystem of a DC motor.  This will include design and development of a GUI software usingMicrosoft Visual Basic 6.0 for position control system experiment.  The scope of this researchis to apply direct digital control technique in position control system.  Two types of controllernamely PID and  fuzzy logic controller will be used to control the output response. Aninteractive software will be developed to visualize and analyze the system. This project consistsof  hardware equipment and software design. The hardware parts involve in interfacingMS150 Modular servo System and Data Acquisition System with a personal computer.  Thesoftware part includes programming real-time software using Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0.Finally, the software will be integrated with hardware to produce a GUI position controlsystem.Key words:   virtual instrumentation, PID, fuzzy logic, position control system, servomotor,direct digital control, graphic user interfaceAbstrak.   Objektif kertas kerja  ini adalah untuk menyiasat dan membandingkan prestasispesifikasi masa diantara pengawal konvensional dan pengawal suatu perisian interaktifkomputer akan direka dengan menggunakan Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 yang berupayamengawal kedudukan shaft motor dalam sistem motor servo. Skop projek ini adalah untukmenggunakan teknik kawalan terus digital dalam mengawal kedudukan shaft motor servo.Pengawal PID dan  logik kabur akan digunakan untuk mengawal isyarat keluaran motorservo. Projek ini terbahagi kepada dua bahagian iaitu perkakasan dan perisian.  Bahagianperkakasan terdiri daripada membina hubungan antaramuka antara MS150 Modular servosistem dengan kad perantaramukaan dan komputer peribadi. Bahagian perisian pula adalahlebih kepada mereka bentuk perisian untuk pengawal PID dan logik kabur denganmenggunakan Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0.Kata kunci:   virtual instrumentation, PID, logik kabur, kedudukan sistem kawalan, motorservo, kawalan terus digitalJurnal Teknologi, 45(D) Dis. 2006: 1–17© Universiti Teknologi Malaysia1 Department of Control and Instrumentation Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,81310 Skudai, Johor. Email: drfuaad@fke.utm.my2 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTEM), LockedBag 1200, 75450 Ayer Keroh Melaka.JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:22 PM1MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY21.0 INTRODUCTIONThe evolution of programming paradigms was marked by the transition frommachine language to assembly languages, and from these to functional,procedural, and, eventually, object- oriented, high-level languages. During thesepast years, a totally new paradigm evolved along these lines, offering problemsolving approaches in a new dimension graphical data flow programming inthe form of so called virtual instruments. Virtual instrumentation is defined asa visualization and centralization of complex measurement system on a standardpersonal computer in the form of a virtual user interface. A user sees a uniformcomprehensive single system, consisting of many individual measuringcomponents in a virtual instrumentation(VI).The main purpose of this research is to design a software based programwith Graphical User Interface (GUI) in controlling the position of aservomechanism or also known as servomotor. It involves understanding onhow to interface personal computer (PC) with position control system throughData Acquisition System (DAS). This research can be divided into two parts;namely hardware and software. The hardware part involves interfacing MS150Modular servo System and Data Acquisition System with a personal computerwhereas the software part includes programming real-time software usingMicrosoft Visual Basic 6.0.2.0 DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEM (DDC)Direct Digital Control (DDC) technology gives today’s industrial user theflexibility to tailor near any system to specific needs using convenient software-based control. A simple concept that has blossomed into a complex array ofcomponents and systems, DDC is basically a microprocessor-based technologyin which a controller performs closed-loop functions via sophisticated algorithmsand strategies. A typical schematic of direct digital control is shown in Figure 1.The controller function handles inputs and outputs electronically while thesoftware provides the logic. Within the controller, the analogue signal entersthe system where it is converted to a digital form so that the data can be actedupon according to a set of parameters or formulas. The result is the executionof commands directly to end device. Since the programs used by the controllersare in digital form, the operations are known as direct digital control [2,3].DDC control brings speed, precision, flexibility to control functions at lowcost. It can range from simple control of a single loop to the application oflarger systems controlling a multitude of loops. Controllers may function asstand-alone units or be networked into systems using a PC as a host to provideadditional functions. Most intelligent DDC devices residing on a network todayare capable of sophisticated equipment control and remote communication.JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:22 PM2PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 32.1 PID ControllerPID stands for Proportional-Integral-Derivative. This is a type of feedbackcontroller whose output, a control variable (CV), is generally based on the errorbetween some user-defined set point (SP) and some measured process variable(PV). Each element of the PID controller refers to a particular action taken on theerror.There are many situations that require some type of servo-control system.This section reviews the fundamental of PID controllers and presents detailedsimulations or design for development of digital servomotor controller. PIDcontrollers are commonly used to regulate the time-domain behaviour of manydifferent types of dynamic plants. These controllers are extremely popularbecause they can usually provide good closed loop response characteristics,can be tuned using relatively simple rules and are easy to construct using eitheranalogue or digital components. Consider the feedback system shown in Figure2 where we assume that the plan is a DC motor whose shaft position must beaccurately regulated.The PID controller K(s) is placed in the forward path, so that its outputbecomes the voltage applied to the motor’s armature. The feedback signal iseither an angular shaft position or velocity, measured by a potentiometer or atachometer, respectively. In the block diagram, these transducer dynamics arein the feedback path. The output position signal y(t) (or velocity signal) is summedwith a reference signal r(t), or command signal, to form the error signal e(t).Finally, the error signal is the input to the PID controller.Figure 1   Direct digital control schematicC(s)OutputpositionR(s)InputpositionADCServomotorplantAnaloguefeedbacktransducerDigitalfeedbacktransducerComputerControlalgorithmDACFinalcontrolelementJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:22 PM3MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY4Figure 2   General feedback architecture2.2 Digital PID ControllerThe PID controller is defined by the following relationship between thecontroller input e(t) and the controller output v(t) that is applied to the motorarmature:  v t K E t Kp I Dore K de tdt( ) ( ) ( ( )= + +! " (1)To discretise the controller, we need to approximate the integral and thederivative terms to form suitable for computation by a computer. By using z-transform, we may discretise the analogue PID controller to obtain the pulsetransfer function for the digital PID controller as the following equation [4].Positional Form of the PID control scheme is given as;  G z C zR zK KzK zp I D( )( )( )( )= = +#+ ###1111(2)whereKP = proportional gain = KKTT KKiI# = #2 2KI = Integral gain = KTTiKD = Derivative gain =   KTTdR(s)InputpositionC(s)OutputpositionPIDcontrollerSensor/transducerDCservomotorplant+-JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:22 PM4PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 5Equation (2) can be written in a sequence operation as in Equation (3).Equation u(k) will be used to develop the coding program for PID controllerwhich corresponds with sequence operation [5].u(k) = Kpe(k) + KiTs enk=$0(n)+KdTs-1 [e(k-1)] (3)where Ts = time sampling = 1mse(k) = error between desired value and actual valueeit=$0(k) = total errore(k) - e(k - 1) = deviation errorThe values of Kp, Ki and Kd are calculated using the root locus technique. Thetuning method used is the Ziegler Nichols. The PID controller has beensimulated using MATLAB to ensure the manual calculation is correct. Thevalues of Kp, Ki and Kd are as follow:Kp = 1.266Ki =  0.1261thus Ti =  KKdi= 10.0444 % 10Kd = 0.0563thus Td = KKdp= 0.044 % 1.0After calculating these values, the coding for the PID controller can be written.The flow chart for the system can be virtualized as in Figure 3.2.3 Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC)Figure 4 is the flow chart in designing the FLC. In developing the design, weneed to initialize and declare what the inputs and outputs variables are. Then,define the mathematic model so that we could carry out simulation using theprevious value and the changes in the output. All parameters are then used byFLC to be simulated. FLC is a subroutine of the main simulator programdesigned in this project. The FLC design methodology is shown in Figure 5.JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM5MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY62.4 FuzzificationThe position control of the servo system configuration was designed based on2 inputs and 1 output. Inputs for this controller are error and rate (de), and themotor output. Fuzzification is where we define the quantization and membershipfunction for input variable, error and rate (de) and output variable, motor outputin universe of discourse. It involves the conversion of the input and outputsignals into a number of fuzzy represented values (fuzzy sets). Figure 6 showsthe input and output variables that are used in the system.Figure 3  Flow chart for the PID controller systemStartRead input fromDAQCompute errorCompute proportionalactionCompute integralactionCompute derivativeactionSend output to DAQEndDelay untilnext sampleJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM6PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 7Figure 4  Flowchart of simulatorPlant/ Math modelFuzzy logic controllerPlottingk = k + 1YesK = endendFLC subroutine :1) Fuzzification2) Knowledge base3) Inferencing4) DefuzzificationStartIntializationanddeclarationNJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM7MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY8Figure 5  FLC design methodologyStart          Study the system-  determine the objective-  identify process and   controller’s input and output          Defuzzification-  choose defuzzification   method function               Interencing-  derive the fuzzy control rules-   based-  define the inference engine-  define the membership   function   Fuzzy controller operation-  fuzzification-  fuzzy inference-  defuzzificationSimulation and testingPerformanceParameter tuning- mapping of   membership function- fuzzy inference rules- scaling factorEndYesNoJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM8PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 9Quantization of input and output variables:(i). Input variables :• Error(e)Quantized into 3 fuzzy sets:  negative error (Ne), zero error (Ze) and positiveerror (Pe). Figure 7 shows the error input variable.Figure 6  The input and output variableFigure 7  The error input variableJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM9MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY10Figure 9  The motor output variable•  Rate(de)Quantized into 3 fuzzy sets: negative rate (Nde), zero rate (Zde) and positiverate (Pde). Figure 8 shows the rate input variable.(ii). Output variable:Figure 8  The rate input variable• Motor outputQuantized into 3 fuzzy sets:  negative output (No), zero output (Zo) and positiveoutput (Po). Figure 9 shows the motor output variable.JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM10PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 112.5 Knowledge BasedThe basic function of the rule based is to represent the expert knowledge in aform of if-then rule structure. The fuzzy logic can than be derived into a 3 × 3rule which consist of 9 rules. Figure 10 shows the fuzzy logic rules.The fuzzy logic rules-based are:1) If error is Ne AND de is Nde THEN output is No2) If error is Ne AND de is Zde THEN output is No3) If error is Ne AND de is Pde THEN output is Zo4) If error is Ze AND de is Nde THEN output is No5) If error is Ze AND de is Zde THEN output is Zo6) If error is Ze AND de is Pde THEN output is Po7) If error is Pe AND de is Nde THEN output is Zo8) If error is Pe AND de is Zde THEN output is Po9) If error is Pe AND de is Pde THEN output is Po2.6 InferencingThe inference mechanism provides the mechanism for invoking or referring tothe rule base such that the appropriate rules are fired. There are severalmethodologies to derive the Inferencing method. Two most common methodsused in fuzzy logic control are the max-min composition and the max-(algebraic)product composition. The inference or firing with this fuzzy relation is performedvia the operations between the fuzzified crisp input and the fuzzy relationFigure 10   The fuzzy logic rulesJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM11MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY12representing the meaning of the overall set of rules. As a result of thecomposition, one obtains the fuzzy set describing the fuzzy value of the overallcontrol output.For this system, max-min composition is used for the inferencing. Figure 11shows the firing strength for the rule base using max-min inference.Figure 11  The firing strength for the rule base using max-min inference2.7 DefuzzificationFor this system, centroid method is used for defuzzification. It is given by thealgebraic expression:JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM12PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 13        zu z zu zzz& =$$( )( ). (4)2.8 Hardware ConnectionHardware connection is done by interfacing between Personal Computer andMS150 Modular Servo System through AX5412H Data acquisition card. Theconnection is shown in Figure 12. There are 8 differential inputs (or 16 singleinput) and 2 outputs from the AX5412 data acquisition card. Only 2 differentialinputs are used for measurement and both outputs are used to control thedirection and speed of the motor. The connection between MS150 ModularServo System and AX5412H data acquisition card will be shown in theexperiment procedure respectively.The driver used in this project is the Axiom Device Manager version 1.1where AX5412H is set at based address 300 with differential input and outputrange set at 10v bipolar.Figure 12  Connection between PC and MS150 through AX750 Screw Terminal PanelAX750 Screw Terminal PanelMS 150 Modular Servo SystemPersonal ComputerJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM13MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY143.0 PID RESULTSThe waveform obtained from the direct digital control experiment is thenanalyzed. The terms defined above are used for each combination of PIDcontroller. Figure 13 shows the result which is captured within the GUI. Table1 shows the analysis of the best output result which is captured within the GUI.All the system characteristics terms are analyzed using Yokogawa DL1546 DigitalOscilloscope. The unit used for rise time, Tr, settling time, Ts, peak time, Tp areall is milliseconds (ms). %OS is in percentage (%), ' is dimensionless, (n is rad/s and unit for steady state error, ess is in Volt.3.1 Fuzzy Logic ResultsThe waveform obtained through the direct digital control experiment wasanalyzed. The terms defined above were used for the fuzzy logic controller.Figure 14 shows the result which is captured within the GUI. From the captureresult, it can be concluded that the output response of the fuzzy logic controllerhas a percentage overshoot of 0.8V that is 16% overshoot.Figure 13  PID result which was capture within the GUIJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM14PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 154.0 DISCUSSIONThe output response of both the PID and Fuzzy logic were compared. Table 2shows the comparison between the output response using the PID and Fuzzylogic. From the analysis and comparison of both controllers, the PID controllerTable 1  The analysis of PID controller output resultGain(%)Systemcharacteristic Output waveformP=10I=100D=50%OS = 0Tr=415.38Ts = 538.46Tp=476.92' = 0.66(n= 11.27ess= 0.10Figure 14  The fuzzy logic result which is captured within the GUIJTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM15MOHD FUA’AD RAHMAT & MARIAM MD GHAZALY16performs better compared to Fuzzy logic in terms of percentage overshoot,with 0% overshoot compared to fuzzy logic with an overshoot of 16%. But,when comparing both of the rise time and settling time of both controllers, thefuzzy logic controller performs better, with a Tr of 400.00 ms and Ts of 100 ms.5.0 CONCLUSIONPID controllers are commonly used to regulate the time-domain behavior ofmany different types of dynamic plants. These controllers are extremely popularbecause they can usually provide good closed loop response characteristics,can be tuned using relatively simple rules and are easy to construct using eitheranalogue or digital components. To discretise the PID controller, we need toapproximate the integral and the derivative terms to forms suitable forcomputation by a computer. By using z-transform, we may discretise theanalogue PID controller to obtain the pulse transfer function for the digitalPID controller. Then, equation u (k) is used to develop the coding program forthe PID controller which corresponds with the sequence operation.To design the fuzzy logic controller, the position control of the servo systemconfiguration is designed based on 2 inputs and 1 output. Inputs for thiscontroller are error and rate (de), and the motor output. Fuzzification is wherethe quantization and membership functions for input variable, error and rate(de) and output variable, motor output in universe of discourse are defined. Itinvolves the conversion of the input and output signals into a number of fuzzyrepresented values (fuzzy sets). The knowledge based of a fuzzy logic controllerconsists of a data based and a rule based. The basic function of the rule basedis to represent the expert knowledge in the form of if-then rule structure. Thefuzzy logic was derived into a 3 × 3 rule which consist of 9 rules. For thissystem, max-min composition is used for the Inferencing to obtain the fuzzyset describing the fuzzy value of the overall control output.  Defuzzification is a                Table 2  Comparison output between PID and fuzzy logic controllerPID FLC(best response)Tr 415.38ms 400.00msTs 538.46ms 100ms%OS 0% 16.0%JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM16PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN PID AND FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER 17mapping from a space of fuzzy control actions defined over an output universeof discourse into a space of non-fuzzy (crisp) control action. For this system,centroid method is used for defuzzification.REFERENCES[1] Axiom AX5412-H Data Acquisition Board User Manual[2] Auslander, D.M. 1990. Real-time Software for Control. Prentice Hall.[3] Perdikaris, G.A.  1991. Computer Controlled Systems-Theory and Application. Kluwer Academic Publisher.[4] Ogata, K.  1995.  Discrete Time Control Systems. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall.[5] VanLandingHam, H.F. 1985. Introduction to Digital Control System. Macmillan Publishing Company.JTD/2005/30 7/19/07, 4:23 PM17

Performance comparison between PID and fuzzy logic controller in position control system of dc servomotor

http://eprints.utm.my/4113/1/JTD_2005_30.pdf

Performance comparison between PID and fuzzy logic controller in position control system of dc servomotor

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository