Introduction: Teaching medical professionalism is increasingly
acknowledged as an important aspect of medical education.
The Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) is an
assessment tool for evaluating medical professionalism, but
no studies using it as a self-assessment instrument have been
reported. This paper reports on a preliminary investigation of the
Finnish version of the P-MEX instrument as an assessment and
self-assessment measure.
Methods: The sample in the present cross-sectional study
comprised all 23 medical students and recent graduates (15 females
and 8 males) participating in a summer school of psychiatry
program in 2014. The two-month program combines clinical
work with multifaceted teaching and intensive tutoring. At the
end of the program, the participants’ medical professionalism was
assessed by the tutors and other members of the work community
as well as the students themselves using the Finnish version of the
P-MEX instrument. The P-MEX scores were compared, using the
Friedman test.
Results: The mean values and SD for the P-MEX assessments
were as follows: tutor assessment 3.26±0.21, work community
assessment 3.23±0.26 and self-assessment 3.01±0.07. No
significant gender differences were observed. The tutor and work
community assessments were significantly correlated (r=0.573,
p=0.040), but the self-assessment scores did not correlate with
either of the other assessments. Overall, the students evaluated
their skills significantly poorer in comparison to the other
assessments.
Conclusion: Although the small sample size limits the
generalization of these preliminary results, the Finnish version
of the P-MEX instrument appears to be a feasible measure of
medical professionalism. The instrument can also be used as a
self-assessment instrument, but subjective evaluations should be
complemented with external assessments or feedback in order to
take individual and cultural aspects into account