De Clerck, R.

Torreele, E.

Open Marine Archive

International Council for the
Exploration of the Sea
ICES CM 1988/G:26
Demersal Fish Committee
\ •
. ~ ..
FEEDING HABITS OF COMMON DAB ( LIMANDA, limanda ' L)
IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA
by R. De Clerck and E. Torreele
Fisheries Research Statio~
Ankerstraat 1 / 8400 Oostende- Belgium
SUMMARY
The paper. describes the investigation on the feeding habits of
COmmon dab ( Limanda limanda L.) in 1987 during two groundfi'sh
surveys in the Southern Nort Sea. A large variety of prey species
( morethan 30 ) were identified. The seqUence in descending
order of importance was Cumacea, Amphipoda and ophiura albida.
The results showed some relationship between predator size and
prey size. Differences in, prey - selection occurred depending on'
the depth. Coastal _ dab mainly fed on Polychaeta. Crustacea
dominated the diet in the depth range 20-50 meter· and
Echinodermata was the most important food in depths over 50
meter. Clear differences in stornach content were also ... noted '
during the course of the day. a
RESUME
Ce rapport decrit les investigations en· 1987 sur -les habitudes
alimentaires de la 1imande ( Limanda limanda L.) lors de' deux
prel~ve~ents 'sur des, poissons demersaux.,dans la partie
meridionale de la mer du Nord. Une- grande variete de proies (plus
de 30 ) a ete identifiee.· En importance decr6issante il y'-' avait
Cumacea, Amphipoda et ophiura albida. Les resultats indiquaient
une certaine relation entre la taille du predateur et la taille
de la proie. Des differnces dans la selection. de la proie se
produisaient suivant _la profondeur. La limande de la zone cöti~re
se 'nourrissait principalemerit de Polychaeta. Crustacea dominait
le regime alimentaire pour les profondeurs entre 20-50 m~tres et
l' Echinidermata etait la nouriture la plus importante pour les
profondeurs de plus de 50 m~tres. Des differences manifestes dans
le contenu stomacal ont ete notees dans-le courant de la journee •
This study was subsidized by the "Institute for Scientific
Research in Industry and Agriculture"(IWONL), Brussels,Belgium.
2INTRODUCTION
.."
i
I
I i
I
i
,
Thc dab population is vcry abundant all over thc North sca
and its biomass was 'estimatcd at a valuc of about 744
thousand tons (Jirnrning,1981) bcing by far thc most important
of all flatfishcs in that area. Implications with regard to'
multispecies assessments can therefore be cxpected mainly
concerning food competition with other flatfishes.·
However the bibliography on the food of dab· is rather"
limitcd. The aim of this study was to contribute to the röle
of the dab as a predator. To this end the spccics composition
of ·the stomach : content was analysed. Furthcrmore the
influence of depth, predator size and time on the diet was
studied. .
•
•
i
I
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Stomach samples were collected as part of two groundfish
surveys in 1987,viz the August beamtrawl survey and the
September pre-recruit survey.' The sampled area is shown on
figure 1. The August survey covered the eastern part of
IVc and consisted of 38 stations during which a total of,SOG
stomaehs were analysed. During the September survey carried
out along the. Belgian coast 28 stations were sampled
resulting in' a total of 89 stomachs. Due to the nature of
these surveys fishing was limited to the daytime.
On each ·haul the guts of a number of dab were dissected by
cutting off at the pharynx and pylorus. Individual guts were
presetved in 10 % buffered formaldehyde. Each stornach content
was analysed to the species level where.possible,. digestion.
sometimes made prey identification difficult oreven
impossible.
The final results were expressed in percent composition by
number for each prey species or prey group.
i
I
~
I 3J"
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
Figure 1.- Sampled are
••
. ," ';
3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1.General species preference
The analysis of the stomach content clearly demonstrated that
the food of dab is highly variable and extensive as shown in
table 1. Dab seemed to be a typical non-selective feeder.
The different prey species and groups can be described as
follows:
CNIDARIA-ANTHOZOA
This group of organisms constitutes an occasional food
component. Its occurrence amounted only to 0.59 % • "Thfs
coincides with the findings of Arntz (1971) and Kühl ( 1963).
This group was represented only by one species,viz. Metridium
senile k._
ANNELIDA-POLYCHAETA
Polychaet worms seemed to be an additional food component of
the dab ( 4.9 % ). However in sha1low waters it constituted the
main bulk of the food. Pectinaria koren i M. was hy far the
most important species of that group. Arntz (1971), De 'Groot
(1971), Kuh1 (1963) and Lande (1976) came to the same
conc1usions. In general the worm as ,weIl the tube were 'found
together in the guts. The length of the worms varied.•
between 5 to 40 mm. -
MOLLUSCA
Molluscs also did not contribute very much to the diet of the
dab. The percentage was 3.69. The most frequent species were
Thracia papyracea Poli, Chlamys oppercularis L. and spisula
ssp.
ARTHROPODA-CRUSTACEA
Large amounts of Crustacea occurred in the stomachs of dab.
This group represented more than 78 %. Moreover in the deeper
waters this group was by far the major food supply. The fact
that Crustacea dominate the diet of dab has also been reported
by several authors as Arntz (1971),Hartley(1940),Jo~es
(1952) ,Jonsson (1966), Knust (1986) ,Kuhl (1963), and 'Lee (
1972). The three main groups were Cumacea (29.2 %), Amphipoda
(27.27 %) and Anomura ( 15.69%).
The majority of the Amphipoda component in the diet consisted
of Gammarus ssp with proportions ranging to 90%.
.e
, I
I
I
I
I
i
I
i
I
I
!,
, I
. ,
I
I
I
, ,
I
I I
4
ECHINODERMATA
This group was the sacond most important group in the diet of
dab (12 ~ 6 %). The main species consumed was Ophiura albida
(11.88 %) ,which was also raported by Kriust (1986),Kühl.( 1963)
and Lee (1972). Whenaver o. albida occurred a certain amount
of sand in the guts was also noted. .
CHORDATA
Only on very rare occasions Pomatoschistes ssp were detected
indicating the unimportant ro1e of this group as prey for dab.
Ascideacea as, repo'rtcdby Knust (1986) and Lande ( 1976) were
not recorded during this·study.
.'
2. Changes in dict with increasing size
To examine thc. diet' associated with body length tlie data were
divided into four predator lenght groups, as shown in tablc 2. ..
The stomach content was exprcssed in percentages for each
length group. .
The main conclusion which could be drawn from this exercise was
that dab smallerthan 20 cm mainly. fed on small sized Crustacea
as Cumacea and Amphipoda.These findings .do not .coriflict with
the ones pUblished byArntz (1971) .and Lee (1972) ~ Generally
they amounted t6 over 60 % of .the total diet. Dab 1arger than
20 cm still fed on' these two groups ,but tlie importance
decreased gradually to, less than 30 %. At the same time dab
started to prey on l'arger Crustacea as P~ lorigicornis. The
latter constituted more than 50 % of the total food intake in
the largest ,dab category. . . . . . .,
The trend thus observed iridicated thc preference of young dab
to feed on small and easy digestable food~ Older dab ingested
larger preys including shells and Ophiuridae with litlle
nutritive value.
3. Changes in diet withincreasing depth
A close examination of,stomach anal~~is from different fishing
grourids (Arntz,1971, Kühl, 1963 an Lee, 1972), lead to the
conclusion that the food composition tended. to vary
considerably depending onthe area. However these differences
could have been.mainlYcaused by the depth~
The data of, this study were classificdint6 four, depth
categories, vize .lcss than 20 meter, 21 to 35 meter, 36 to 50
meter arid more than 50 meter. The results are presented in
table 3 ;Clear differences in the diet became. ~pparent as ci
function cf thebenthos distribution and abtindance. Below 20
meter the feeding pattern was charactirized by'the predoininance
of P.koreni ( 17.27 %) arid other Polychaeta( 33.77 %).In,deeper
areas Crustacea becamc 'the dominant::prey group. Amphipoda were
the main food supply for the areas between 21 and' 35 meter
(45.7%), whereas Cumacea was the most, abundant prey group in
deeper.waters up to 50 meters. Another obvious trend was the
fact that o. albida became· also more important in deeper
watcrs. The coverage ofthe areas over 50 meters was rather
limited ( only three stations)but the results were iri line with
the trerid : O.albida . formed the main part of the diet ( 53.5
%) followed by Amphipoda and Cumacea. The occurance of
•.,
5
, '
Ophiuroidea in' the 'dab; sto~~~h at higher depths must be
related to the fact that Ophiuroidea are the dominant benthos
component in deeper waters. Thus the dab depended on the
Ophiuroidea as the most readily available food supply in the
absence of other more nutrient prey .
4. Changes in diet with time
The data of the two most important depth zones, viz. 21-35
meter and 36- 50 meter, were further studied for differences in
stornach fullness with time. This area is believed to have·the
highest densities of dab (Lee, 1972) and has shown clear
differences in the diet composition of this study ( part 3).
The results as presented in tables 4a and 4b clearly show a
marked difference of stomach fullness during the course of~the
day. The highest percentage of occurence was concentrated'~;':;'­
between 10' and 14 hour. After that period this perce'iiEage
declined gradually up to a minimum value between 18 an' 22
hour. The early morning samples ( between 6 an 10 hour) however
showed an increase comparing to the former evening value. This
trend indicated that the highest feeding activity of dab was in
the morning, whilst during the evening and the first part of
the night food intake was minimal. Other authors came to
similar conclusions (Artnz, 1971 and Knust, 1986).
:
in the course·of the dayRegarding the number of empty stomachs
the following trend was observed:
6- 10 hour 8.4 % empty
10-14 hour 3.9 % empty
14-18 hour : 2.35 % empty
18-22 hour : 0.17 % empty
These results could be an indication
feeding activity during the night.
CONCLUSIONS
,x
that there was
This contribution tended to' illustrate some aspects of· the
feeding pattern of dab and the role as a Crustacean feeder. In
general the conclusions were in line with former studies in
that field. However new information became available on ':the
parameters which could influence the diet of dab, viz. :,;the
length of the predator, the depth and the time. Further
research should be more directed into the quantitative
approach.
.------------ -- -
6
l
!I,
BlBLlOGRAPHY
Arntz'- W. E., 1971. Die Nahrung der Klieshe (Li'manda ,limanda
L.) in der Kieler·Bucht. The food of dab (Limandalimanda L.)
in Kiel Bay. Ber.dt. wisse Kommn. Meeresforsch., 22
(2). 129-183. •
De Groot. S. J.,. 1971. On' the interrelationships between
morphology of the"alimentary tract, food and'feeding behaviour
in flatfishes (Pisces ': Pleuronectiforms) • ' Netherlands~ Journal, e
of SeaResearch, 5 (2), 121-196. '
"
Hartley, P. H. T'-, 1940'. The Saltash tuck-net fisheryarid the'
ecology of,some estuarine fishes. J. mar.biol. Ass.-U~K. 24
1-68~
Jones, N. S.; 1952. The bottom fauna and the food offlatfish'"
off the Cumberland coast. J. Anim., Ecol., 21 (2), 182-205.
Johnson, G. ,1966~ Contribution toth'e bia'logy of the' dab
'(Limanda limanda L.) in the lceland waters. Rit.
Fishkideild, 4 (3), 1-36.' . '
Jimming, Y., 1981. The dominant fishfauna in the North Sea and
its determination. lCES'C. M. 1981/G : 16.
Knust, R., 1986. Food select:lon of dab '(Limanda limanda L.)'
diet and seasonal changes. lCES C. M., 1986/G : 63.
Kühl, H., 1963. Uber,die Nahrung der Scharbe (Limanda limanda
L.). Arch. ~ish. wiss., 14, 8-18.
--.:
Lande, R., 1976. Food and feeding habits of the Dab (Limanda
limanda L.) in Borgenfj orden', north Trondelaq, .Norway Norw. J.
Zool., 24, 225-230.
Lee, C. K. C., 1972. The populationdynamics and biology of the
common dab (Limanda limanda L.) in the North Sea. Ph. D.
Thesis, Univ. of East Anglia, U.K., 105 p.
· .
7
Table 1.- Analysis of stomach content
in percent
composition by number
TAXONOMY ORGANISM
Cnidaria-Anthozoa
Metridium senile
Polychaeta
Nereis spp
Nephtys spp
Pectinaria koreni
Arenicola marina
Ophelia spp
Sabella spp
Lanice spp
Eggs of Polychaeta
Others (rests, ••• )
Mollusca
Natica alderi
Chlamys oppercularis
Dorsina lupinus
Spisula spp
Gastrana fragilis
Ensis ensis
Mya spp
Mytilus edulis
Thracia payracea
Others (undeterrninated)
Arthropoda-Crustacea
Cumacea
Mysidacea
Amphipoda
Decapoda
Crangon crangon
Pandalus spp
Galathea spp (juveniles)
Porcellana longicornis
Eupagurus bernhardus
Corystes carsivellanus
Macropipus holsatus
Echinodermata
Ophiura albida
Ophiotrix fragilis
Psammechinus miliares
Chordata
Pornatoschistes spp
+ < 0.5 %
NUMBER
36
30
41
80
4
2
13
2
58
61
13
52
6
44
2
2
3
2
104
4
1767
248
1653
17
26
311
556
59
25
80
720
17
29
3
% COMPOSITION
BY NUMBER
0.59
0.50 f.
0.68
1.32"
+
+
+
+
0.96
0.98
+
0.86
+
0.73
+
+
+
+
1.72
+
29.2 --=
4.09
27.27
+
+
5.13
9.17
o. 97 ~
+
1. 32
11.88
+
+
+
8Table 2.- Analysis of stomach content diet with increasing
size
TAXONOMY ORGANISM LENGTH (CM) .
<15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35
P. koreni 0.97 1.37 1.32 1.25 0.35
Other Polychaeta 2.90 4.52 3.71 0.66
T. papyracea 13.54 0.55
.I 0.21 0.42Other Mollusca 0.19 2.27 1.23 2.08 3.54
Cumacea 38.30 16.71 42.68 29.25 8.8
Mysidacea 2.38 8.50 eAmphipoda 33.46 47.95 11.4 5.23 23.18
Galathea spp 1. 74 11.15 1.67 1.08 2.12
P. longicornis 5.01 9.28 31.60 53.09
E. bernhardus 2.90 0.55 1.48 1.67 ·0.88
M. holsatus 1.35 2.36 0.74 0.42 3.54
Other Arthropoda 0.29 1.89 0.82 0.67
o. albida 4.45 5.37 16.83 23.75 0.68
Other Echinodermata 0.19 . 0.55 0.80 1.92
Table 3.- Analysis of stomach content diet with increasing
depth
TAXONOMY ORGANISM DEPTH (M)
<20 21-35 36-50 >51
P. koreni 17.27 0.75 0.65
Other Polychaeta 33.77 1.49 2.83 2.07
•
T. papyracea 2.98 0.60
Other Mollusca 3.40 0.56 3.02 0.59
Cumacea 8.64 26.37 32.97 22.20
Mysidacea 0.44 8.54
Amphipoda 8.38 45.70 16.14 25.15
Galathea spp 4.75 6.48
P. longicornis 11.42 8.50
E. bernhardus 2.09 0.24 1. 81
M. holsatus 9.95 1.21 0.95 2.36
other Arthropoda 5.67 1.15 0.07
O. albida 10.73 2.32 16.70 53.30
Other Echinodermata 0.60 0.72 2.36
. '.
9
Table 4a Analysis of stomach content of dab changes in diet
with time , depth 21-35 m.
TAXONOMY ORGANISM TIME
......
6-10 10-14 14-18 18-22
P. koreni 0.77
Other Polychaeta 0.58 0.73 0.47 0.06
,,'
T. papyracea 2.88 0.21
other Mollusca 0.21 0.06 0.06
•
Cumacea 4.17 3.85 16.02 0.62
Mysidacea 0.44
Amphipoda 6.39 25.73 14.94 0.62
Galathea spp 4.23 0.29 0.37
P. longicornis 9.02 2.01 ·0.62
E. bernhardus .0.12 0.06 0.48
other Arthropoda 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.41
O. albida 0.17 1.24 0.58 0.41
Other Echinoderrnata 0.37 0.12 0.06 0.41
TOTAL 16.22, 45.27 35.28 2.66
Table 4b Analysis of stomach content of dab changes in
diet with time,depth 36-50
e TAXONOMY ORGANISM TIME6-10 10-14 14-18 18-22
P. koreni 0.37 0.05 0.14
Other Polychaeta 0.12 1.65 1. 09
T. papyracea 0.63
Other Mollusca 0.30 2.06 0.81
Cumacea 0.84 29.24
Mysidacea 8.54 0.46
Amphipoda 0.58 15.13 0.32 0.12
Galathea spp 1.53 3.52 1.41 1.39
P. 1ongicornis 5.29 3.23
E. bernhardus 0.19 0.49 0.60 0.49
M. holsatus 0.12 0.70 0.05 6.12
Other Arthropoda 0.07
O. a1bida 14.85 2.67
Other Echinodermata 0.05 0.70
TOTAL 18.95 56.91 1.6.21 13.85


Feeding habits of common dab (<i>Limanda limanda</i> L) in the Southern North Sea

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Open Marine Archive