Steinberger, J.

English

Steinberger, J

CERN Document Server

Bruno Pontecorvo, his contributions to my physics and personal recollections

Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository

DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2014-11759-5Colloquia: Pontecorvo100IL NUOVO CIMENTO Vol. 37 C, N. 3 Maggio-Giugno 2014Bruno Pontecorvo, his contributions to my physics and personalrecollectionsJ. SteinbergerCERN - CH-1211 Geneva 23, SwitzerlandI met Pontecorvo when I was a PhD student at the University of Chicago, 1946 -1948.He came several times from Canada to see his teacher and friend Fermi, who was alsomy teacher.In 1947 Pontecorvo published a Phys. Rev. letter in which he noted that experimentalresults on the interaction strength of cosmic ray mesotrons with nuclear matter, whichcould be deduced, very roughly, within a factor of ≈400, from the experiment of Conversi,Pancini and Pontecorvo, (1946), which had demonstrated that the interaction of themesotron is much too weak to be the particle proposed by Yukawa to be responsiblefor nuclear forces, were, within that factor, compatible with the interaction strength ofnuclear β decay, and that therefore there might be a universal Fermi interaction.Only a year later, with the help of my thesis experiment, this was clearly correct, butat the time it was an enormously imaginative suggestion, and no one (except Pontecorvo),in particular also Fermi, could imagine a parallel between the mesotron, now the muon,and the electron, and the article was completely rejected by the community, and is stillforgotten, although the universal Fermi interaction, and more generally lepton flavoursymmetry are now pillars of particle physics and this was their first suggestion.I am personally very indebted to Pontecorvo for his proposal, in 1959, that, usingbeams of neutrinos produced by high energy accelerators, one could check whether theneutrino in muon decay is the same as that in β− decay, or is a different particle.Independently at about the same time, Schwartz proposed that one could use neutrinobeams to learn about the weak interaction at higher energies although the article doesnot mention the possible application of neutrino beams to the question of the possibledifference of electron and muon neutrinos, Pontecorvo could not do the experiment,since by this time he was in the USSR, and there were no accelerators in the USSR ofsufficient energy, but in Brookhaven and CERN 25 GeV proton accelerators were justbeing completed and permitted the experiment.In 1962 we were able to show that muon and electron neutrinos are different particles,and for this Mel Schwartz, Leon Lederman and I received the Nobel prize.These are just two examples of Pontecorvo’s insights and imagination; there are others.Modern particle physics, especially as it concerns neutrinos, owes a great deal to BrunoPontecorvo.c© Societa` Italiana di Fisica 19

http://eprints.bice.rm.cnr.it/18582/1/ncc10805.pdf

Bruno Pontecorvo, his contributions to my physics and personal recollections

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CERN Document Server

Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository