Costa, Ursula

Kos, Daphne

Kramer-Roy, Debbie

Laver Fawcett, Alison

Margot-Cattin, Isabel

Pasqualoni, Pier Paulo

Poissant, Lise

Rouleau, Marc

Schiller, Sandra

Van Nes, Fenna

York St John University Institutional Repository

Occupational Therapy Masters Education in Europe: Shared curriculum areas and example learning outcomes COTEC-ENOTHE 2016  Theme - Development and innovation; 11. Curriculum development Workshop Leader:  See list of authors below  Ursula Costa1, Daphne Kos2 Alison Laver-Fawcett3, Isabel Margot-Cattin4,  Pier Paolo Pasqualoni1,   Lise Poissant5, Marc Rouleau5, Sandra Schiller6, Fenna van Nes7  Debbie Kramer-Roy7,8  1 Master of Science in Occupational Therapy Programme, University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Austria. ursula.costa@fhg-tirol.ac.at; PierPaolo.Pasqualoni@aau.at 2Flanders’ Master programme, KU Leuven & University of Ghent, Belgium. Daphne.Kos@faber.kuleuven.be 3Faculty of Health and Life Science, York St John University, Lord Mayors Walk, York United Kingdom. a.laverfawcett@yorksj.ac.uk 4University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, School of Social Work and Health – EESP, Department of Occupational Therapy, Lausanne, Switzerland. isabel.margot@eesp.ch 5School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada marc.rouleau@umontreal.ca; lise.poissant@umontreal.ca 6Faculty of Social Work and Health, HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hildesheim/Holzminden/Goettingen, Goschentor 1, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany. sandra.schiller@hawk-hhg.de 7European Master of Science in Occupational Therapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands. f.a.van.nes@hva.nl; d.e.kramer-roy@hva.nl 8 Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University, London, United Kingdom,  debbie.kramer-roy@brunel.ac.uk     Summary of the Workshop:  Rationale The ENOTHE Masters’ post-professional curriculum project has facilitated the exchange of programme documentation and comparison with TUNING competencies to produce a statement of common Masters’ curriculum areas. Example learning outcomes/competencies illustrate each common curriculum area. It is envisioned that this statement will be used to: support future curriculum development; enable benchmarking and refining of current Masters’ curricula; and facilitate international collaboration and exchange between programmes. This statement is a tool to allow both commonality and uniqueness that reflects the diversity of different programmes, as opposed to definitive standards.    Purpose: To engage colleagues in a discourse to obtain feedback and address challenges associated with the selection of example occupational therapy specific and generic Masters learning outcomes for each shared curriculum areas.  Objectives: 1) Present work from the Masters project group related to identified shared curriculum areas and example learning outcomes/competencies.  2) Discuss the differences between learning outcomes that focus on knowledge, skills and/or attitudes. 3) Explore the potential applications of the proposed statement of common masters curricula in participants’ countries. 4) Following the workshop, a synthesis of discussion/ feedback will be produced to inform the final project report.  Format • Presentation of the process and the product of the working group • Facilitated small group discussion • Feedback and summary   Maximum number of participants: 50 participants  Intended participants: Occupational Therapy practitioners, educators, curriculum developers, Masters students, graduates, and all interested in Masters education, learning outcomes and Tuning. Financial support by ENOTHE is gratefully acknowledged. 

Occupational Therapy Masters Education in Europe: Shared curriculum areas and example learning outcomes

Occupational Therapy Masters Education in Europe: Shared curriculum areas and example learning outcomes

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

York St John University Institutional Repository