Varijacije u kliničkoj slici i epidemiologiji dubokih dermatomikoza vlasišta [The clinical pattern variations and epidemiology of deep seated tinea capitis]
Tinea capitis caused by Microsporum canis is usually noninflammatory.
However, progressive number of severe kerion like tinea capitis (TC) due to M. canis
has been recently registered. Providing that the same fungal species might evoke
different clinical patterns, interspecies polymorphism within M. canis isolates might
have been responsible for this phenomenon.
The aim of this study was to examine genotypic variability among isolates of
M. canis from patients with superficial and deep seated tinea capitis.
Sixty strains of M. canis from patients with both superficial and deep seated
tinea capitis have been isolated and identified to the species level using standard and
advanced mycological procedure techniques. Morphological identification was
confirmed by molecular methods PCR-RFLP (Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction
Fragment Length Polymorphism). After amplification of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region, the
PCR product was exposed to restriction enzyme HinfI. All strains of M. canis had
identical pattern on gel electrophoresis. For sub typing of M. canis isolates the RAPD
(Random Amplified Polimorphic DNA) has been perfomed using (ACA)5 and (GACA)4
primers. After RAPD amplification with (ACA)4 primer, among all M. canis isolates
only one RAPD profile was determined, whereas using (GACA)4 primer two different
band patterns were confirmed.
According to the results of the epidemiological part of our study M. canis
remained the main causative agent of TC in Croatia. The incidence of TC remained
high during the ten-years period (2006-2015), but decrease in the incidence of TC
was observed in the first 5 years, with stable incidence of TC during the last 5 years
of the study period. A statistically significant increase of TC among all fungal skin
infections during the last 3 years was observed. The association between RAPD profiles and certain clinical type of tinea
capitis was not determined by the use of GACA4 primer . Results of most molecular
studies show that there is no clonal differentiation within M. canis. Moreover, using
the same (GACA)4 primer M. canis was found not to be genotypically unique.
However, furhter investigations on larger group of patiens might be required in order
to elucidate this problem more precisely