This research investigates the value of patent analysis in an industrial context. An
empirical approach is taken to test the benefits and limitations of a series of patent
analysis techniques. The technology profiles of a group of competitor companies
within the oil/petrochemicals area are mapped to evaluate the analysis techniques.
Patent quantity analysis benefits from speed of execution but provides no indication
of patent quality. The International Patent Classification (IPC) hierarchy can map a
company’s technological diversity but the correlation of IPC categories with industry
or product areas may present difficulties in a business-focused analysis.
An experiment within the polymer chemistry area suggests there is a positive
association between a patent’s citation counts and its commercial significance, as
rated by expert grading. This supports the use of patent citation data to compare the
quality of companies’ patent portfolios but the time lag to build citation counts may
limit its usefulness in practice.
Maps of inter-company patent references may indicate technological leadership but
the value of other bibliographic-based techniques appears more marginal. A trend of
inter-company differences in the volume of the ‘References Cited’ list is observed.
If confirmed, this could impact the value of bibliographic-based patent analysis
techniques.
Patent analysis can assist in a merger evaluation, particularly at the due diligence
phase, but it is often of secondary importance to financial and product market
information.
Several factors that may distort patent statistics are identified. These include
inadequate company name consolidation, errors in patent classification and
differences in national patent legislation. The study concludes that patent analysis
has a valid place in the corporate environment, provided the output is interpreted
judiciously