Bartko, H

CERN Document Server

29th International Cosmic Ray Conference Pune (2005) 4, 1720Towards Dark Matter Searches with the MAGIC TelescopeH. Bartko , A. Biland, E. Bisesi, D. Elsa¨sser, P. Flix, P. Ha¨fliger,M. Mariotti, S. Starkand W. Wittek for the MAGIC collaboration(a) Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich Germany(b) ETH Zurich, Switzerland(c) University of Udine and INFN Trieste, Italy(d) University of W¤uerzburg, Germany(d) Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Edici Cn Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain(e) University and INFN Padova, Italy.Presenter: H. Bartko (hbartko@mppmu.mpg.de), ger-bartko-H-abs3-og21-posterMAGIC is a 17m diameter Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescope installed on the Canary Island La Palma. Thetelescope is designed for gamma-ray astronomy in the 30 GeV to 30 TeV energy range. Particle physics modelspredict candidate particles for Dark Matter, that might annihilate into gamma rays. Their predicted energy isin the accessible range of the MAGIC telescope. The expected gamma fluxes depend strongly on the densityprofiles in the innermost regions of the Dark Matter halos.The prospects and strategies for indirect Dark Matter searches with the MAGIC Telescope are described. Theobservability and flux expectations from possible targets are discussed.1. IntroductionThe existence of Dark Matter is well established on scales from galaxies to the whole universe. Nevertheless,its nature is still unknown. Most of it cannot even be made of any of the known matter particles. A number ofviable Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP) candidates have been proposed within different theoreticalframeworks, mainly motivated by extensions of the standard model of particle physics (for a review see [1]).These include the widely studied models of supersymmetric (SUSY) Dark Matter [14]. Supersymmetric ex-tensions of the standard model predict the existence of a good Dark Matter candidate, the neutralino  . In mostmodels its mass is below a few TeV. Also models involving extra dimensions are discussed like Kaluza-KleinDark Matter [12, 13].Any WIMP candidate (SUSY or not) may be detected directly via elastic scattering off nuclei in a detectoron Earth. There are several dedicated experiments already exploiting this detection technique, but they havenot yet claimed any strong and solid detection (for a review see [2]). Complementary, WIMPs and especiallySUSY neutralinos might annihilate in high-density Dark Matter environments and may be detected by theirannihilation products. In particular, annihilation channels that produce gamma-rays are interesting becausethese are not deflected by magnetic fields and preserve the information of the original annihilation region, i.e.they act as tracers of the Dark Matter density distribution.The expected mass range of SUSY neutralinos lies between about 50 GeV and a few TeV. Thus the continuumgamma-ray spectra from potential SUSY neutralino annihilation coincides well with the MAGIC energy region.2. The MAGIC ExperimentThe Major Atmospheric Imaging Cherenkov telescope (MAGIC [3]) is the largest Imaging Air CherenkovTelescope (IACT). Located on the Canary Island La Palma at 2200m a.s.l, the telescope has a 17m diameterhigh reflectivity tessellated parabolic mirror dish, mounted on a light weight carbon fiber frame. It is equipped18 H. Bartko et al.with a high efficiency 576-pixel photomultiplier camera, whose analogue signals are transported via opticalfibers to the trigger electronics and the 300 MHz FADC readout. Its physics program comprises, among othertopics, pulsars, supernova remnants, active galactic nuclei, micro-quasars, gamma-ray bursts and Dark Matter.MAGIC has started observations in summer 2004, during the last phase of commissioning. Several knowngamma sources were observed and analyzed like the Crab nebula, Mrk-421 and 1ES1959+650. A furtherchallenge is the analysis of events below 100 GeV. The analysis methods are presently being adapted to theselow energies. A second telescope, MAGIC-II, is being constructed and expected to be ready for data taking inthe end of 2006. This will improve the angular and spectral resolution and flux sensitivity of the system.3. Gamma-rays from neutralino annihilationsNeutralino annihilation can generate continuum  -ray emission, via the process 	 . The subsequent de-cay of  -mesons created in the resulting quark jets produces a continuum of  -rays. The expected annihilation -ray flux above an energy threshold  thresh arriving at Earth is given by:ﬀﬂﬁﬃ! #"%$#ﬃ'&'()*+ ,    ﬁﬃ! #"%$#ﬃ &.-/0-13246578:9;-<los =9;?>@3ACBD+&E&6AFB(1)where124G5is the thermally averaged annihilation cross section, 8 ; the mass and=; the spatial density distri-bution of the hypothetical Dark Matter particles.ﬁﬃ! #"%$#ﬃ& is the gamma yield above the thresholdenergy per annihilation. The predicted flux depends on the SUSY parameters and on the spatial distribution ofthe Dark Matter. The energy spectrum of the produced gamma radiation has a very characteristic feature witha cut-off at the mass of the Dark Matter particle. Moreover, the flux should be absolutely stable in time.As the expected flux is proportional to the Dark Matter density squared, high density Dark Matter regions arethe most suitable places for indirect Dark Matter searches. Simulations and measurements of stellar dynamicsindicate that the highest Dark Matter densities can be found in the central part of galaxies and Dark Matterdominated dwarf-spheroidal-satellite galaxies (with large mass-to-light ratio). Numerical simulations in a ColdDark Matter framework predict a few universal DM halo profiles (for example see [4]). All of them differmainly at low radii (pc scale), where simulation resolutions are at the very limit.Combining the SUSY predictions with the models of the DM density profile for a specific object, the gammaflux from neutralino annihilations can be derived. The SUSY predictions are taken from a detailed scan of theparameter space assuming Minimal Supergravity (mSUGRA), a simple and widely studied scenario for super-symmetry breaking (for details see [5]). For a given choice of mSUGRA parameters the values of 8 ;B132465andHare determined and the consistency with all observational constrains is checked. High DM density ob-jects which are relatively nearby like the center of the Milky Way, its closest satellites and the nearby galaxies(M31,M87) are prime candidates for the indirect search for Dark Matter annihilation.3.1 Galactic CenterThe presence of a Dark Matter halo in the Milky Way Galaxy is well established by stellar dynamics [15].In particular, stellar rotation curve data of the Milky Way can be fit with the universal DM profiles predictedby simulations [8, 7, 9]. In addition, the Dark Matter may be compressed due to the infall of baryons to theinnermost region [5] of a galaxy creating a central spike of the Dark Matter density. This central Dark Matterspike would boost the expected gamma flux from neutralino annihilation in the center of the galaxy. Althoughthis model of baryonic compression is based on observational data and in good agreement with cosmologicalTowards Dark Matter Searches with the MAGIC Telescope 19)2 (GeV/cχm10 2 10 3)-1s3v> (cmσ<10-3010-2910-2810-2710-2610-2510-2410-2310-2210-2110-20mSUGRA Scan = 20 hobsMAGIC - TGC - Compressed NFWGC - Uncompressed NFWDRACO - NFWM31 - NFWM87 - NFW < 0.132 hΩ0.09 <  < 0.092 hΩ > 2 TeV12 < 0.13 - M2 hΩ0.09 <  > 2 TeV12 < 0.09 - M2 hΩFigure 1. Expected exclusion limits for the four most promising sources of Dark Matter annihilation radiation for 20 hoursof observation with MAGIC. The Galactic Center is expected to give the largest ux (lowest exclusion limits) amongst allsources.simulations of the condensation of baryons [6], the existence of such a Dark Matter spike in the center of theMilky Way strongly depends on the Black Hole history during galaxy formation.For a comparison between the expected gamma fluxes from neutralino annihilation and the MAGIC sensitivityboth the uncompressed NFW DM halo model [7] and the adiabatic contracted NFW profile [5] are considered.3.2 Draco dwarf spheroidal and nearby galaxiesThe Milky Way is surrounded by a number of small and faint companion galaxies. These dwarf satellites areby far the most Dark Matter dominated known objects, with Mass-to-Light ratios up to 300. Draco is the mostDM dominated dwarf satellite. DM density profiles derived from Draco stars cannot differentiate betweencusped or cored profiles in the innermost region, as data are not available at small radial distances. Moreover,observational data disfavors tidal disruption effects, which may affect dramatically the DM distribution inDraco. We adopt the recent cusped DM model which includes new Draco rotation data [8].Moreover, we adopted NFW models for the nearby galaxy M31 [9] and the Virgo Cluster [10]. These profilesdo not take into account any enhancement effect, like adiabatic contraction or presence of DM substructures.4. SummaryComparing the expected gamma ray flux from neutralino annihilation in the considered candidate sources withthe MAGIC sensitivity [17], expected exclusion limits can be derived. Figure 1 shows expected exclusionlimits for 20 hours of MAGIC observations in the mSUGRA planeﬁﬃ! #"%$#ﬃ&132465vs. 8 ; for the fourmost promising sources considered. The nominal energy threshold  thresh has been conservatively assumed to20 H. Bartko et al.be 100 GeV. The change in energy threshold and effective collection area of the telescope with the zenith angleof the observation have been taken into account.The expected fluxes are rather low and depend strongly on the innermost density region of the DM halosconsidered. The detection of a DM  -ray signal from the Galactic Center is possible in case of a very highdensity DM halo, like the one predicted by adiabatic contraction processes. Improvements on the  thresh couldallow to test a significant portion of the SUSY parameter space. The gamma flux from the Galactic Center asmeasured by the HESS experiment is far above the theoretical expectations and extends to energies above 10TeV [16]. Thus only part of this flux may be due to the annihilation of SUSY-neutralino Dark Matter particles.Nevertheless, other models like Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter are not ruled out. It is interesting to investigate andcharacterize the observed gamma radiation to constrain the nature of the emission. Due to the large zenithangle for Galactic Center observations, MAGIC will have a large energy threshold but also a large collectionarea and good statistics at the highest energies. The Galactic Center was observed recently (May-July 2005)and data are being analyzed [11].In the long term we consider Draco as a plausible candidate for Dark Matter inspired observations. Conserva-tive scenarios give low fluxes which are not detectable by MAGIC in a reasonable observation time. However,there are several factors that might enhance the expected flux from neutralino annihilations in Draco. OtherDark Matter particles, like Kaluza-Klein particles, may produce higher gamma-rays fluxes. Draco is the mostDM dominated dwarf (M/L up to 300) and an object where no other  -ray emission is expected. Low zenithangle observations will preserve the nominal (low)  thresh of the MAGIC telescope. Moreover, there are noknown high energy  -ray sources in the FOV which could compete with the predicted gamma flux from DarkMatter annihilation.4.1 AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank A. Moralejo for fruitful discussions about the MAGIC sensitivity.References[1] G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Physics Reports, 267, 195-373 (1996)[2] J. Gascon, astro-ph/0504241[3] C. Baixeras et al. (MAGIC Collab.), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A518 (2004) 188.[4] J. Navarro, C. Frenk and S. White, ApJ 490, 493 (1997)[5] F. Prada, A. Klypin, J. Flix et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 241301 (2004)[6] O. Gnedin et al., Astrophys.J. 616 16-26 (2004)[7] N. Fornengo et al., Phys. Rev. D70 103529 (2004)[8] E. Lokas et al., MNRAS May (2005) L48.[9] N. W. Evans et al., Phys.Rev. D69 123501 (2004)[10] D. E. McLaughlin, ApJ 512 L9 (1999)[11] H. Bartko et al. these proceedings.[12] G. Bertone, G. Servant, and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 044008.[13] L. Bergstrom et al., (2004), astro-ph/0410359.[14] J. R. Ellis et al., Nucl. Phys. B238 (1984) 453.[15] A. Klypin, H. Zhao, and R. S. Somerville, ApJ 573 (2002) 597.[16] F. Aharonian et al., A&A 425 (2004) L13.[17] A. Moralejo, Monte Carlo Simulations for the MAGIC telescope, in preparation.

Towards Dark Matter Searches with the MAGIC Telescope

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CERN Document Server