research

Quality improvement financial incentives for general practitioners

Abstract

This report reviews outcomes of intervention programmes targeting reductions in potentially avoidable hospitalisations (PAHs) and/or avoidable Emergency Department presentations (ED presentations) among people with chronic disease. The focus is on the role of primary health care and where possible programmes targeting specific vulnerable populations, namely Indigenous Australians, rural and remote residents and those at socioeconomic disadvantage. This report also aimed to examine tQuality improvement includes aspects of self-reflection and benchmarking, with continued evaluation to identify where additional improvements to practice can be made. Measures of the quality of care are typically structure (e.g. related to an organisation’s operations), process (e.g. clinical guidelines or care pathways) or outcomes-based (e.g. physiological indicators). Improvements can be measured in relative or absolute terms. The likelihood of engaging with incentives and the behavioural responses of health professionals are affected by the different characteristics of financial incentives, which may be directed at networks of practices, individual practices, or specific health care professionals. Payments may be offered as a bonus or addition to usual earnings, or may be withheld if practices do not achieve desired outcomes. Payments may be prospective or retrospective and may be linked to fixed thresholds or individual patients.ends in PAHs and ED presentations among people with chronic disease

    Similar works