CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Recoil following Wiktor stent implantation for restenotic lesions of coronary arteries
Authors
M.E. (Michel) Bertrand
G.A. (Gerrit Anne) van Es
+10 more
P.P.T. (Peter) de Jaegere
G. Kober
J.F. Marquis
J. Piessens
W.R. (Wolfgang) Rutsch
P.W.J.C. (Patrick) Serruys
R. Uebis
B. Valeix
M. (M.) Vrolicz
V. Wiegand
Publication date
1 January 1994
Publisher
'Wiley'
Doi
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine acute recoil of the vessel wall immediately after Wiktor stent implantation in native coronary arteries of 77 consecutive patients and to assess whether there was compression or “late recoil” of the stent itself at long-term follow-up. Furthermore, the relationship between recoil and a number of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables was studied in addition to the relation between acute recoil renarrowing or restenosis was assessed. All angiograms were analyzed with the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System using automated edge detection. Acute recoil was defined by the difference between the mean diameter of the fully expanded balloon on which the stent was mounted and the mean diameter of the stented segment. Late recoil was calculated by comparing the mean diameter of the stent itself immediately after implantation and at follow-up without opacification of the vessel. Acute recoil amounted to 0.25 ± 0.32 mm or 8.2%. Multivariate analysis identified sex (coefficient = –0.20, p = 0.04) and stent/artery ratio (coefficient = 0.99, p = 0.0001) as the only independent predictors of acute recoil. “Late recoil” of the stent itself was not observed. The overall difference between the mean diameter of the stent itself immediately after implantation and at follow-up was –0.15 ± 0.33 mm, suggesting an overall increase in diameter of 5.0%. There was no relation between acute recoil and late restenosis. On the contrary, there was a trend towards a greater degree of recoil in patients without restenosis. Moreover, linear regression analysis disclosed a weak but negative correlation between acute recoil and a loss in minimal luminal diameter (coefficient: –0.55, p = 0.04). The Wiktor stent effectively scaffolds the instrumented vessel. Only a minimal amount of acute recoil was noted, which did not contribute to late luminal renarrowing or restenosis. In addition, no late compression of the stent itself was observed. These data suggest that tissue ingrowth into the lumen of the stented segment is the main cause of late luminal renarrowing after stent implantation. © 1994 Wiley-Liss,Inc.
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Erasmus University Digital Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:repub.eur.nl:54824
Last time updated on 04/08/2016