The effects of groundnut cake and local [zsh meal on the growth and protein utilisation of rabbits were studied.

The eight weeks feeding trial involving twentyfour, six-week-old male and female exotic white rabbits weighing

550-610 g in a completely randomised design were fed three diets: a control diet which had the combination of groundnut cake and local fish meal, and experimental diets that had either groundnut cake or local fish meal

as the protein source. The groundnut cake (GNC) and the local fish meal (LFM) were high in protein (48.13% and 52.15% respectively), the local fish meal had a low fibre level (0.83 %) while the groundnut cake was low in ash (5.22%) but high in fiber (5.52%). Both protein sources supplied appreciable arrwunts of protein and minerals. The control diets gave significantly (P<O.Ol) better weight gains than the groundnut cake and local fish meal diets respectively. Protein efficiency ratio was also significantly (P<O.Ol) better with control diets, when

compared with the eNC and LFM diets. No significant differences were obtained in the level offeed: Gain from

rabbits fed the trial diets. There was no incidence of enterities or mortality among the treatment groups

A. M., Bamgbose

C. U., Achike

W. O., Biobaku

Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository

PertanikaJ. Trap. Agric. Sci. 26(2): 73 - 77 (2003) ISSN: 1511-3701© Universiti Putra Malaysia PressUtilisation of Different Protein Sources for Growing RabbitsW.O. BIOBAKU 1, A.M. BAMGBOSE 2 & C.U. ACHlKE31&3 - College of Animal Science and Livestock ProductionUniversity of AgricultureP.M.B 2240, AbeokutaNigeria2Department of Animal ProductionAbubakar Tafawa Balewa UniversityP.M.B 0248 BauchiNigeriaKeywords: Protein sources, groundnut cake, local Itsh meal, protein utilisationABSTRAKKesan hampas kacang tanah dan serbuk ikan tempatan ke atas pertumbuhan dan penggunaan protein olehamab dikaji. Percubaan pemberian makanan selama Lapan minggu melibatkan dua puluh empat amab putiheksotik jantan dan betina berusia enam minggu seberat 550-610 g dalam satu pola rawak sepenuhnya telahdiberi makan tiga diet: satu diet kawalan yang mengandungi kombinasi hampas kacang tanah dan serbuk ikantempatan, dan diet eksperimen yang mengandungi sama ada hampas kacang tanah (eNC) dan serbuk ikantempatan (UM) adalah tinggi kandungan protein (masing-masing 48.13% dan 52.15%), serbuk ikantempatan mengandungi tahap serat yang rendah (0.83 %) manakala hampas kacang tanah rendah tahapabunya (5.22%). Kedua-duanya sumber protein membekalkan jumlah protein dan mineral yang ketara. Dietkawalan memberikan signifikan (P<O.Ol) tambahan berat yang lebih baik daripada hampas kacang tanah danserbuk ikan tempatan. Nisbah keberkesanan protein juga secara signifikannya lebih baik (P<O.Ol) dengan dietkawalan, apabila dibandingkan dengan diet eNC dan UM. Tiada perbezaan signifikan diperoleh pada tahappemberian makanan: Tambahan berat daripada amah yang diberi makan diet percubaan. Tiada insidenkematian yang berlaku di kalangan kumpulan rawatan.ABSTRACTThe effects of groundnut cake and local [zsh meal on the growth and protein utilisation of rabbits were studied.The eight weeks feeding trial involving twentyfour, six-week-old male and female exotic white rabbits weighing550-610 g in a completely randomised design were fed three diets: a control diet which had the combination ofgroundnut cake and local [zsh meal, and experimental diets that had either groundnut cake or local [zsh mealas the protein source. The groundnut cake (eNC) and the local[zsh meal (UM) were high in protein (48.13%and 52.15 % respectively), the local [zsh meal had a low fibre level (0.83 %) while the groundnut cake was lowin ash (5.22%) but high in fiber (5.52%). Both protein sources supplied appreciable arrwunts of protein andminerals. The control diets gave significantly (P<O.Ol) better weight gains than the groundnut cake and local[zsh meal diets respectively. Protein efficiency ratio was also significantly (P<O.Ol) better with control diets, whencompared with the eNC and UM diets. No significant differences were obtained in the level offeed: Gain fromrabbits fed the trial diets. There was no incidence of enterities or mortality among the treatment groups.INTRODUCTIONThe world is faced with inflation and there is theproblem of lack of food to sustain its ever-growing population. The demand for proteinhas risen greatly and the human dependence onanimals for protein is increasing, especially sinceplant proteins are generally deficient in fouressential amino i.e. acids lysine, methioninetryptopharn and lencine. If meat consumptiondemands are to be met in Nigeria, encouragementfor the production of short-eycle animals likepoultry and especially rabbits should be givenw. O. BIOBAKU, A. M. BAMGBOSE & C. U. ACHIKEgreat consideration by government andappropriate research institutes.Rabbits possess attributes that make themadvantageous over other livestock species.Rabbits can be produced on forage alone,although production can be improved byaddition of other feed supplements. Rabbits arehighly prolific and have a short gestation period(28-32 days). They are also good converters, easyto care for and they require low capitalinvestment in rearing.In biological value, it is comparable tochicken (Biobaku and Oguntona 1997). Themeat is white, highly favoured nutrition andappetizing (Biobaku 1998). There is no religiousprohibition against the consumption of rabbitmeat in most countries (Biobaku 1998).The objective of this study is to examine theeffect of protein concentrates sourced from plantand animal products on the growth performanceof weaner rabbits.MATERIALS AND METHODSThree diets termed A,B, and C were prepared.Diet A contained the groundnut cake and localfish meal. Diet B had only the groundnut cakewhile Diet C had only the fish meal as shown inTable 1. The diets were all pelleted and werecalculated to contain 20.42-20.89% crude proteinand 9.48-10.42KJ/gM.E.Twenty four six week old New Zealand whitemale and female rabbits weighing 550-610 gwere obtained from University Teaching andResearch Farm. The animals were divided intothree groups of eight rabbits per group with anaverage weight of 579 g in each groups. Eachgroup was further sub-divided into two, suchthat duplicate groups of four rabbits wereobtained for each sub-group with two rabbitsper cage. The rabbits were fed the pelleted dietdaily at 8:30 am. Water was provided ad libitum.Feed refusals were weighed during the lastfourteen days of each collection period in orderto calculate the feed intake in gld over thefourteen-day period.Digestibility of the diet was carried out inthe sixth week of the experiment and lasted forseven days. The first four days were for adaptationof the animals to the new environment and thelast three days were used for collection. Tworabbits were used per replicate. Records of thedaily feed intake and the daily faeces voidedwere kept. Faeces collected were dried in anoven at about 125°C for 24-48 h.Records of weekly body weight gain, feedintake faeces voided, feed efficiency ratio, proteinefficiency ratio and digestibility of protein werecalculated for eight weeks. These calculationswere done on dry matter basis.TABLE 1Percentage composition of experiment dietsComponentsYellowGroundnut cakeLocal fish mealBrewer's GrainsOyster shellBone mealVit./Mineral PremixSaltTotalCalculated AnalysesControl Groundnut cake Local fish mealDiet Diet (GNC Diet) (LFM Diet)52.97 47.85 54.116.36 18.617.17 12.3930.00 30.00 30.002.00 2.00 2.001.00 1.00 1.000.25 0.25 0.250.25 0.25 0.25100.00 100.00 100.00Protein (%)Energy (KJ/gm)Calcium (%)Methionine (%)Lysine (%)20.4210.422.640.740.6420.899.482.440.700.5820.5510.202.480.720.6274 PERTANIKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 26 O. 2, 2003UTILISATION OF DIFFERENT PROTEIN SOURCES FOR GROWl G RABBITSFeed efficiency ratio determinationFeed efficiency (per week)=Total body weight gain/week (kg)Total feed intake/week (kg)Protein efficiency ratio determinationProtein efficiency ratio (per week) =Total body weight gain/week (kg)Total protein consumed/week (kg)Analytical TechniquesSamples of the groundnut cake, local fish mealand the three ratios were analysed for proximatecomposition according to AOAC (1990).Statistical AnalysisPerformance records of the animals weresubjected to one way analysis of variance bymethod of Snedecor and Cochran (1967).Duncan's (1955) multiple range test methodwas used to determine significant differencesbetween means.RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONThe groundnut cake used in this trial contained48.13% protein which was significantly (P<O.Ol)lower than the protein in the local fish meal,which contained 52.15%.The dry matter, fat and ash contents of localfish meal were significantly higher than thosefound in the groundnut cake (Table 2).The levels of the crude fibre were (18.25%)for the control diet, groundnut cake (20.25%)and local fish meal (20.25%). Cheeke (1983)had reported that although rabbits digest fibrepoorly, dietary fibre is useful in preventingentiritis and for chewing. A level of 15-18%dietary fibre is therefore suggested for optimumgrowth.Beyond 18%, it may caecal impaction, butfibre again is indispensable for adequate fillingof the digestion tract and maintenance of normalperistatic movements (Arveux 1980).Although the crude fibre in their diets variedfrom 18.25-20.45%, there was no observation ofcaecal impaction, and this agrees with thefindings of Ekpenyong and Biobaku (1986), thatTABLE 2Chemical composition of groundnut cake, local fish meal andexperimental diets (% dry matter basis)Chemical Groundnut Local fish meal Control diet Groundnut Local fish mealComposition cake (GNC) (LFM) cake diet (GNC diet LFM diets)(% Dry matter)Moisture 7.48 4.81 11.50 12.00 17.00Crude protein 48.13 52.15 20.15 18.85 19.25Ether extract 6.05 7.76 2.20 2.25 1.50Crude fibre 5.52 0.83 18.25 20.45 20.25Nitrogen free 26.53 6.11 24.90 23.20 18.00extractAsh 5.22 26.84 22.00 22.00 23.00MineralsPotassium (%) 0.332 0.442 0.342 0.348 0.356Phosphorus % 0.048 0.640 0.042 0.062 0.068Calcium % 0.440 0.560 0.364 0.342 0.354MagnesiumPpm 0.714 0.124 0.164 0.184 0.174Managanese 226 268 224 218 216PpmIron (ppm) 142 142 138 136 136PERTANIKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 26 0.2,2003 75W. O. BIOBAKU, A. M. BAMGBOSE & C. U. ACHIKETABLE 3Effects of diets on growth performance of rabbitsPerformance Control diet 1 Groundnut cake Local fish meal ISEMParameters diet (GNC Diet) diet (LFM Diet)Numbers of rabbits 579a2 579a 579a 6.49Initial body weight(g)Final body weight 1145a 1084a 1132a 16.42(g)Daily Wt gain 10.lP 9.02b 9.88a 0.44(g/day)Daily feed intake 90.37a 84.37b 86.4Pb 3.42(g/day)Feed gain 8.94a 9.40a 8.75a 2.46Feed efficiency 0.30a 0.21b 0.29a 0.80Protein efficiency 7.2a 6.29b 7.0P 0.04RatioProtein digestibility 88.40a 85.98c 86.55b 6.42Mortality 0 0 01: Standard error of mean; values are the mean of eight analyses2: Means along the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)crude fibre in the diet of rabbits can be variedfrom 28-32% with no caecal impaction.The effect of the trial diets on growth,feed efficiency, protein efficiency and proteindigestibility is shown in Table 3. Rabbits fedcontrol diets had the highest body weight gain,which is statistically significant (P<O.Ol) whencompared with rabbits fed the groundnut cake.There is no significant difference between rabbitsfed the control diet and those rabbits fed thelocal fish meal diet.The rabbits on the control diet consumedthe highest amount of the diet to produce unitweight gain though they had the best feedefficiency which is statistically not significantwhen compared with other two diets. However,this may be due to the fact that the control dietcontained a balanced protein profile.Table 3 also shows that the rabbits fed thefish meal diet consumed more feed with higherbody weight gain when compared with rabbit-fed groundnut cake diet. This may be due to thefact that animal protein source is better in qualitywhen compared with plant protein source, whichis deficient in some essential amino acids andthis view was supported by Tewe (1995).The poor performance of rabbits fed thediet containing groundnut cake as protein sourcewas supported by Omole (1982) who reportedthat the groundnut cake protein contained largeamounts of nutritionally essential amino acids,particularly arginine but its nutritive value tendsto be limited, particularly by its low content oflysine and methionine which are very essentialfor proper growth of animals.Table 3 also shows the value for the proteinefficiency ratio. The protein efficiency of rabbitsfed the control diet is significantly (P<O.Ol)higher than those of rabbits fed the groundnutcake diet. However, there are no differencesbetween rabbits fed the control diet and thoserabbits fed the local fish meal diet.The protein digestibility in rabbits fed thecontrol diet was significantly (P<O.Ol) higherthan those rabbits fed diets containing groundnutcake and fish meal as protein sources; this maybe due to the levels of protein and crude fibre.The level of crude protein in the control dietwas higher and level of crude fibre lower than inthe other two diets and it had been demonstratedthat feeding elevated levels of fibrous materialsand lower protein levels, reduces the apparentdigestion coefficient of the crude protein inrabbits (Besedina and Pereidik 1970).Table 4 shows that the diet containinggroundnut cake as the protein source reducedthe cost of feed of the minimum level, but thishas not led to improvement in body weight gain,feed consumed, feed efficiency, which showsthat although it is possible to have the cheapestsources of feed, they do not have to produce thebest results on rabbit production.76 PERTANIKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 26 NO.2, 2003UTILISATION OF DIFFERENT PROTEIN SOURCES FOR GROWING RABBITSTABLE 4The influence of experimental diets on the economy of rabbit productionComponents Control diet Groundnut cake diet Local fish meal diet(GNC Diet) (LFM Diet)Total no of rabbits 8 8 8Initial average wt (g) 579 579 579Final average wt (g) 1145 1084 1132Total body wt gain (kg) 0.566 0.505 0.553Total feed consumed (kg) 5.06 4.75 4.86Protein efficiency ratio 7.2 6.29 7.01Total cost of feed 61.080 44.89 52.776Consumer (N)Cost/kg feed (N) 12.071 9.450 10.859Cost of feed/kg wt 21.327 16.697 19.637Gain (N/kg)REFERENCESARVEUX, P. 1980. Fibre requirement of rabbits(French). Cuniculture 7: 13-14.Association of Official Methods of Analysis. 15 thed. Association of Analytical ChemistryWashington, D.C.BESEDlNA, G. G. and N. S. PEREIDIK. 1970. Effectsof fibre on digestibility of nutrients by rabbitskrolikorodstroi. Verorodistvo 6: 3-5 (Russian).BIOBAKU, W. O. and E. B. OCUNTONA. 1997. Theeffect of feeding multi-nutrient mini blocksand pelleted diets on the growth of rabbits.Nig. J of Animal Prod. 24(2):147-149.BIOBAKU, W. O. 1998. Growth response of rabbitsfed graded levels of groundnut shell, effecton organ weights and enzyme activities. JPure and Appl. Sci. 1(1):44-50.CHEEKE, P. R. 1983. The significance of fibre inrabbit nutrition. J Appli. Rabbit Res. 6:103-106.DUNCAN. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F.tests. Bometrics 1: 1-42.EKPENYONc, T. E. and W. O. BIOBAKU. 1986.Growth response of rabbit fed activatedsewage sludge and dried poultry waste. JAppl. Rabbit Res 9. 1: 14-16.OMOLE, T. A. 1982. The effect of level of dietaryprotein on growth and reproductiveperformance of rabbit. J ofAppl. Rabbit Res.5(3): 83-85.SNEDECOR, G. R. and W. L. COCHRAN. 1967.Statistical Methods. The IONA State UniversityPress.TEWE, O. O. 1995. Feeding ingredient andration formulation for economic gains. InProceedings of pI August School, Departmentof Animal Science, University of Ibadan.(Received: 5 March 1997)(Accepted: 10 July 2002)PERTANIKAJ. TROP. AGRIC. SCI. VOL. 26 NO.2, 2003 77

Utilisation of different protein sources for growing rabbits

http://psasir.upm.edu.my/3482/1/Utilisation_of_Different_Protein_Sources_for_Growing_Rabbits.pdf

Utilisation of different protein sources for growing rabbits

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository