Kohlenbach's proof mining program deals with the extraction of effective
information from typically ineffective proofs. Proof mining has its roots in
Kreisel's pioneering work on the so-called unwinding of proofs. The proof
mining of classical mathematics is rather restricted in scope due to the
existence of sentences without computational content which are provable from
the law of excluded middle and which involve only two quantifier alternations.
By contrast, we show that the proof mining of classical Nonstandard Analysis
has a very large scope. In particular, we will observe that this scope includes
any theorem of pure Nonstandard Analysis, where `pure' means that only
nonstandard definitions (and not the epsilon-delta kind) are used. In this
note, we survey results in analysis, computability theory, and Reverse
Mathematics.Comment: In Proceedings CL&C 2016, arXiv:1606.0582
