Group testing is a well known search problem that consists in detecting the
defective members of a set of objects O by performing tests on properly chosen
subsets (pools) of the given set O. In classical group testing the goal is to
find all defectives by using as few tests as possible. We consider a variant of
classical group testing in which one is concerned not only with minimizing the
total number of tests but aims also at reducing the number of tests involving
defective elements. The rationale behind this search model is that in many
practical applications the devices used for the tests are subject to
deterioration due to exposure to or interaction with the defective elements. In
this paper we consider adaptive, non-adaptive and two-stage group testing. For
all three considered scenarios, we derive upper and lower bounds on the number
of "yes" responses that must be admitted by any strategy performing at most a
certain number t of tests. In particular, for the adaptive case we provide an
algorithm that uses a number of "yes" responses that exceeds the given lower
bound by a small constant. Interestingly, this bound can be asymptotically
attained also by our two-stage algorithm, which is a phenomenon analogous to
the one occurring in classical group testing. For the non-adaptive scenario we
give almost matching upper and lower bounds on the number of "yes" responses.
In particular, we give two constructions both achieving the same asymptotic
bound. An interesting feature of one of these constructions is that it is an
explicit construction. The bounds for the non-adaptive and the two-stage cases
follow from the bounds on the optimal sizes of new variants of d-cover free
families and (p,d)-cover free families introduced in this paper, which we
believe may be of interest also in other contexts
