We analyse the secular dynamics of planets on S-type coplanar orbits in tight
binary systems, based on first- and second-order analytical models, and compare
their predictions with full N-body simulations. The perturbation parameter
adopted for the development of these models depends on the masses of the stars
and on the semimajor axis ratio between the planet and the binary.
We show that each model has both advantages and limitations. While the
first-order analytical model is algebraically simple and easy to implement, it
is only applicable in regions of the parameter space where the perturbations
are sufficiently small. The second-order model, although more complex, has a
larger range of validity and must be taken into account for dynamical studies
of some real exoplanetary systems such as γ-Cephei and HD 41004A.
However, in some extreme cases, neither of these analytical models yields
quantitatively correct results, requiring either higher-order theories or
direct numerical simulations.
Finally, we determine the limits of applicability of each analytical model in
the parameter space of the system, giving an important visual aid to decode
which secular theory should be adopted for any given planetary system in a
close binary.Comment: 32 pages, 8 figures, accepted for publication in Celestial Mechanics
and Dynamical Astrophysic