I observe that, as the physics side of the OPERA-anomaly story is apparently
unfolding, there can still be motivation for philosophy of science to analyze
the six months of madness physicists spent chasing the dream of a new
fundamental-physics revolution. I here mainly report data on studies of the
OPERA anomaly that could be relevant for analyses from the perspective of
phenomenology of philosophy of science. Most of what I report is an insider's
perspective on the debate that evolved from the original announcement by the
OPERA collaboration of evidence of superluminal neutrinos. I also sketch out,
from a broader perspective, some of the objectives I view as achievable for the
phenomenology of philosophy of science.Comment: 13 pages, LaTe
