Faculty of Health Sciences, the University of Sydney
Abstract
The authors of this submission welcome the Productivity Commission (PC) Draft Report and many of the key features of the proposed NDIS including: • the proposal for a scheme to provide long term care and support on an entitlement basis, • many of the accompanying features of the approach outlined, including the no fault basis of provision, the inclusion of aids and equipment, and the recognition of the need to include the full range of support services, • the acknowledgment of unmet demand and the need for significant new funding. Our comments on the draft report are made in the spirit that we endorse the main directions of the proposed scheme, which would be of great benefit to the Australian people, most especially people with disabilities and their families. We sincerely hope that governments will respond positively and promptly to the vision laid out in the Draft Report. We offer constructive criticism to maximise the chances of the scheme’s success, in terms of enabling people to access the supports they need, on an equitable basis. In this submission we focus on 5 areas: 1. Eligibility and assessment 2. Assessment Tools 3. Overcoming access and equity barriers for Aboriginal communities 4. Research and Data 5. GovernanceCentre for Disability Research and Polic
