Abstract

We use type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) data in combination with recent baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations to constrain a kink-like parametrization of the deceleration parameter (qq). This qq-parametrization can be written in terms of the initial (qiq_i) and present (q0q_0) values of the deceleration parameter, the redshift of the cosmic transition from deceleration to acceleration (ztz_t) and the redshift width of such transition (τ\tau). By assuming a flat space geometry, qi=1/2q_i=1/2 and adopting a likelihood approach to deal with the SN Ia data we obtain, at the 68% confidence level (C.L.), that: zt=0.560.10+0.13z_t=0.56^{+0.13}_{-0.10}, τ=0.470.20+0.16\tau=0.47^{+0.16}_{-0.20} and q0=0.310.11+0.11q_0=-0.31^{+0.11}_{-0.11} when we combine BAO/CMB observations with SN Ia data processed with the MLCS2k2 light-curve fitter. When in this combination we use the SALT2 fitter we get instead, at the same C.L.: zt=0.640.07+0.13z_t=0.64^{+0.13}_{-0.07}, τ=0.360.17+0.11\tau=0.36^{+0.11}_{-0.17} and q0=0.530.13+0.17q_0=-0.53^{+0.17}_{-0.13}. Our results indicate, with a quite general and model independent approach, that MLCS2k2 favors Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati-like cosmological models, while SALT2 favors Λ\LambdaCDM-like ones. Progress in determining the transition redshift and/or the present value of the deceleration parameter depends crucially on solving the issue of the difference obtained when using these two light-curve fitters.Comment: 25 pages, 9 figure

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions