A new species of the scleractinian coral genus Montastrea de
Blainville, 1830 was discovered in the Philippines and has been given the name
Montastrea multipunctata. This species may have been previously overlooked
due to its striking resemblance to a co-occurring zoanthid. Montastrea multipunctata
is unusual because in situ, sediment accumulation often partially covers
the corallum, especially in the area between the polyps. The features of M.
multipunctata coralla are modified by a polychaete worm that resides within
them, a relationship found in several other faviid species. Although M. multipunctata
shares some characteristics with other Montastrea species, it is clearly
differentiated on the basis of growth form, polyp shape, and corallite morphology,
especially the pointed septal dentations of the primary septa, which are
usually highly exsert over the theca

Hodgson, Gregor

Pacific Science

ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Pacific Science (1985), vol. 39, no . 3© 1985 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reservedA New Species of Montastrea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) fromthe Philippines!GREGOR HODGSON2ABSTRACT: A new species of the scleractinian coral genus M ontastrea deBlainville, 1830 was discovered in the Philippines and has been given the nameMontastrea multipunctata. This species may have been previously overlookeddue to its striking resemblance to a co-occurring zoanthid. Montastrea multi-punctata is unusual because in situ, sediment accumulation often partially coversthe corallum, especially in the area between the polyps. The features of M.multipunctata coralla are modified by a polychaete worm that resides withinthem, a relationship found in several other faviid species. Although M. multi-punctata shares some characteristics with other Montastrea species, it is clearlydifferentiated on the basis of growth form, polyp shape, and corallite morph-ology, especially the pointed septal dentations of the primary septa, which areusually highly exsert over the theca.MATERrAL STUDIEDwith the Veron, Pichon, and Wijsman-Best(1977) revision on this point.Montastrea valenciennesi was first reportedfrom the Philippines (as Favia) by Faustino(1927) and later described in detail by Ne-menzo (1959). The genus Montastrea was firstreported from the Philippines by Pichon(1977), who noted both M . curta and M . mag-nistellata. Complete descriptions of these twospecies were subsequently provided by Ne-menzo and Hodgson (1983). Montastrea annuli-gera is uncommon in the Indo-Pacific andapparently rare in the Philippines. No speci-mens have been collected so far; however,P. Alifio of the University of the Philippinesreports having seen several colonies nearBolinao, Luzon (personal communication).SYNTYPES: 783, 786, 787, 788; Tambuli Reef,Mactan Island, Cebu, Philippines; 6 m; 1982(Hodgson). Deposited at the Marine SciencesCenter, University of the Philippines, Dili-man, Quezon City, Philippines.ADDITIONAL SAMPLES: 776; Tambuli Reef,Mactan Island , Cebu, Philippines; 6 m; 1981(Hodgson)." 777; same location; 6m; 1981283I Manuscript accepted 28 February 1985.2 University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Zoo-logy, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822.3This specimen was lost in the mail.AN UNUSUAL NEW SPECIES of Montastrea wasdiscovered in the Philippines. Colonies arecommonly found in shallow water growing oncarbonate rock and are partially covered withsand and silt. This habit, combined with theliving coral's extraordinary resemblance to aco-occurring zoanthid, may explain why itwas not collected previously. A description ofthe living coral and its skeleton follows a briefdiscussion ofthe state of the genus Montastreaand its occurrence in the Philippines.The most recent revision of Pacific Mon-tastrea grouped over 20 nominal species into 4species: M . curta, M. annuligera, M. magnis-tellata, and M. valenciennesi (Veron, Pichon,and Wijsman-Best 1977). This classificationhas been widely accepted, except for the gen-eric status of the latter species, which someworkers would like to retain in the genusFavia. The question of the generic status ofthis species will not be resolved without fur-ther extensive study. Therefore, I will refer tothis coral as M . valenciennesi simply as aconvenience, without implying agreement284FIGURE I. Corallurn of Montastrea multipunctata(no . 787).PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 39, July 1985(Ross). 778, 779, 780, 784, 785; same location;6 m; 1982 (Hodgson).Additional colonies were studied and pho-tographed in the field.DESCRIPTIONMontastrea multipunctata, sp. n.Colonies are encrusting (Figure I); the lar-gest so far observed was IOem in diameter.The sur face is flattened, irregular, conformingto the substrate. Corallites are mostly subcir-cular and plocoid, although some portionsmay be polygonal (usually pentagonal) andsubcerioid (Figure 2A, B). In addition, sub-fasciculate growth is sometimes present at theFIGURE 2. A, corailurn of M ontastrea multipunctata (no. 786); B, corallurn of M . mult ipunctata (no. 783).NewSpecies of Mantastrea-HoDGSONFIGURE 3. Edge zone of living Montastrea multipunc-tata colony showing new corallite buds .growing edge. Corallites are 3-9 mm in dia-meter and may be flush or exsert ( < 3 mm).When exsert, they are in the form of truncatecones. Calices are 2-6 mm in diameter. Bud-ding is completely extratentacular (Figure 3).The wall is septothecal.Septa (36-48 in number) are in 3-4 veryregular orders. Primaries (10-12) are thick-ened «0.5mm) over the wall and graduallybecome thinner towards the columella; theycarry a wide variety of dentations. The pri-mary septa nearly always carry I or 2 vertical,pointed teeth exsert 1-2 mm above the wall.To the naked eye these teeth appear sharplypointed, but under the microscope they arerevealed to be somewhat blunt-tipped (Figure4). Most commonly there are 2-4 more lobu-late dentations extending subvertically fromthe upper septal margin, which is often hori-zontal ( < I mm wide). From there, the primarysepta descend into the calice, and may carry1- 3 more teeth which project in parallel and atan oblique, superiointernal angle. Second-order septa (12) are thinner, shorter, less ex-sert, and descend less steeply into the calicethan the primaries, but carry more dentations.Like the primaries, second-order septa usuallyhave I pointed, vertical tooth above the wall;they carry 5-7 more dentations projecting inparallel and at a superiointernal angle fromthe septal edge, before reaching the columella.Both first- and second-order septa usuallyreach the columella as separate entities andrarely anastomose. Third-order septa (12) are285F IGU RE 4. Detail of exsert septal dentations, Mantas-trea multipunctata .never more than a thin ridge along the innerwall. They may carry several short dentations.Fourth-order septa (12) are present occasion -ally, but are very reduced and nondentate. Allsepta and septal dentations are abundantlygranulate.Septocostae are in 3 orders correspondingto the septa; they are nondentate but lightlygranulate. First-order septocostae are thewidest ( < 0.5 mm); second-order septocostaeare thinner, but are equally raised out fromthe wall, leaving the third-order septocostaein the intervening valleys. The septocostaerarely extend out onto the exotheca as costae,but if so, they are usually not continuous withthose of adjacent corallites. The columellais composed of thickened trabeculae, sometwisted, some forming vertical pinnacles. Itis usually well developed , especially in largecorallites (Figure 5).The intercalicinal furrows between allcorallites are inscribed with discontinuous,epithecate gaps and holes in the exotheca,similar to those found in Montastrea valen-ciennesi, Leptastrea inaequalis, and otherspecies (Rosen 1968). Upon examination oflive specimens under the dissecting micro-scope, many polychaete worms of a singlespecies were observed moving in and out ofsurface openings of an intercalicinal tube sys-tem. This network of interconnecting tubes is286FIGURE 5. Montastrea multipunctata calice; note sur-rounding polychaete tub e.exposed completely when a colony is crackedopen (Figure 6). Apparently, as the coralgrows upward , the old worm tube s are sealedoff and new ones are made abo ve and parallelto them. In this way, the worms can live inchannels close to the surface where they ap-pear to feed. It is likely that the worms causethe tube system to be formed, perhaps byirritating the coral tissue. The tubes appearto be epith ecal in origin , as noted by Veron,Pichon , and Wijsman-Best (1977).It should be noted that all Montastrea mul-tipunctata colonies observed so far in naturehave had abundant accumulations of sandand silt between their polyps (Figure 7A, B).When this accumulation is bru shed away , thewide, smooth (nonciliated), coenosarc is re-vealed (Figure 8A , B) . Apparently, the non-ciliated coenosarc and flattened, short polypswith their short tentacles are inefficient incleaning the coenosteum of silt buildup.Casual experiments were carried out by pour-ing handfuls of sand on live colonies in situ.The polyps cleaned themselves in less than I hr,but the sand depo sited between the polypsremained after several hours. It is possiblethat under natural conditions, sand accumu-lation may render the coenosteum more sus-ceptible to invasion by the polychaetes byproviding them with a refuge.The live polyps exhibit a wide range ofcolormorphs, including transparent, gray , green,pink , and orange sometimes with a greenPACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 39, July 1985F IGURE 6. Lateral view of Montastrea multipunctatacorallum split in half to reveal multilevel polychaete tub es(no . 788).peristome. The most common color morphhas gray polyps and a chocolate-browncoenosa rc.Despite intensive searching, M ontastreamultipunctata has been observed only in onebiotope. In short, this biotope includes a hardcarbonate substrate covered with some looseshifting sand in 4-8 m of water. This depthrange seems to be very specific. A more de-tailed description of this biotope is given byHodgson and Ross (1981).AF FINIT IESWhen viewed from a distance, the polypsof M ontastrea multipunctata resemble thoseof Blastomussa mer/eti (Figure 9A , B). Thepolyps of both species have a short bod ycolumn so that the oral disk lies just above thecorallites even when the polyp is fully ex-panded. In this state of expansion , the shorttentacles extend out to the sides in the plane ofthe oral disk, often overlapping with adjacentpolyp s. In contrast, other species of Montas-trea have taller, more fleshy polyps with ten-tacles that extend subvertically when thepolyps are expanded (e.g., see figs. 273 and283, Veron, Pichon, and Wijsman-Best 1977).M ontastrea multipunctata is often foundNew Species of Mantastrea-HoDGSON 287FIGURE 7. A, livingcolony ofMontastr ea multipunctata in situ (no. 787); B, M .mult ipunctata colony , daytime in situ;note the natural accumulation of sediment between the retracted polyps and the rough texture of the polyp epidermis(no. 786).FIGURE 8. A, Montastrea multipunctata colony with natural silt accumulation; B, portion of same colony withsediment brushed away to reveal a smooth coenosarc (no. 783).~-.....288 PACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 39, July 1985FIGURE 9. A , Montastrea multipun ctata polyps, half-expanded; B, Blastomussa mer/eli , living colon y, daytime.FIGURE 10. A, M ontastrea valenciennesi, living colony in situ, daytime; same biotope with M . multipunctata; B, M .valenciennesi with polyps retracted, daytime.living near beds of a common colonial zoan-thid , Palythoa sp. The polyps of both speciesare strikingly similar in color, size, and shape.Both are often partially buried in the sand,with only the polyps protruding. Each caneasily be mistaken for the other until the sandhas been brushed away . This similarity mayexplain why M . multipun ctata has escapedprevious notice , despite its relat ive abundancein shallow water.M ontastrea multipun ctata, like M. annuli-gera, shows some affinities with Leptastreainaequalis Klunzinger (L. bottae Nemenzo1959). The size of the coraIlites , developmentof the theca, and intercalicinal groove systemare similar in both species. However, L. in-aequalis is present in greater abundance thanM . multipun ctata within the same biotope. Itis easily distingui shed from the latter speciesin the field by color differences and by theirregular exserticiri of its primary septa, whichare visible through the transparent tissue .Montastrea multipunctata shares somecharacteri stics with M . annuligera and M . val-enciennesi. Fortunately, M. valenciennesi iscommon in the biotope where M. multipun c-tata is found , facilitating in situ comparision(Figure lOA, B). The two species are readil y. . ==:t: 9 Ii t tNew Species of Montastrea-HoDGSON 289FIGUR E I I. A, Mantas/rea annuligera (AIMS) ; B, corallites of M . annuligera (AIMS) . Note the well-developed paliformlobes .differentiated in the field based on the differ-ent polyp morphologies previously noted anddifferent color patterns. Although M. valen-ciennesi occurs in various colors, the formcommon in this biotope is transparent (white)with brown patches. Montastrea annuligeraand M. multipunctata have been differentiatedon the basis of skeletal differences because alive colony of M . annuligera was not availablefor' examination, Coralla of M. annuligerawere examined from the collections of the Ber-nice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, and theAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Towns-ville. In general, the coralla of M . annuligera(Figure llA) and M. valenciennesi are muchmore densely calcified and therefore heavierthan those of M. multipunctata collected fromthe same depth range. The growth form ofboth M. annuligera and M. valenciennesi maybe encrusting, but most colonies tend towarda massive growth form . In contrast, M. multi-punctata colonies are always encrusting andmay even appear to be growing directly out ofthe underlying rock substrate because they fitso closely to the surface.The diameter of Montastrea multipunctatacorallites shows a wide range of variation, buton the average they are larger (3-9 mm) thanthose of M . annuligera (3-4 mm) and smallerthan those of M. valenciennesi (8-15 mm) .The number of corallites per 9 ern? was com-pared between 10 colonies each of M. an-nuligera and M . valenciennesi collected fromthe same depth range (After Wijsman-Best1977), Montastrea annuligera had a range of24-31 corallites (x == 27), while M . multipunc-tata had a range of 16-'-27 corallites (x = 21).The crown of paliform lobes characteristicof both Montastrea annuligera (Figure lIB).and M . valenciennesi is absent in M . multi-punctata. Instead, a series of spinulate den-tations project internally until the lowerones reach the columella. Since the septa ofM. multipunctata descend into the calice ata lower slope than those of M . annuligera, thecalices of the former have a shallower ap-pearance. These characteristics, along withthe extraordinary development of septal den-tations over the theca, clearly separate thisspecies from all others.ACKNOWLEDGM ENTSI would like to thank Porfirio Alifio, MayaBorel-Best, Francisco Nemenzo, Michel Pi-chon, Mike Ross, J. V. N. Veron, and JohnWells for examining this material (or photo-graphs) and for providing helpful advice. Themanuscript also benefitted from the valuableeditorial assistance of John Stimson. Thisfieldwork was completed while I was a U. S.Peace Corps Volunteer attached to the Bu-reau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources,Cebu City, Philippines.290LITERATURE CITEDFAUSTINO, L. A. 1927. Recent Madreporariaof the Philippine Islands. Monogr. 22. Bu-reau of Science, Manila.HODGSON, G., and M. A. Ross. 1981. Unre-ported scleractinian corals from the Phi-lippines . Proc. 4th Internat. Coral ReefSymp., Manila 2: 171-175.NEMENZO, F. 1959. Systematic studies on Phi-lippine shallow water scleractinians. II.Suborder Faviida. Nat. Appl. Sci. Bull.16:73-135.N EMENZO, F ., and G. HODGSON. 1983. Philip-pine scleractinian corals, additional re-cords. Phil. J . Sci. 112(1-2) :29-55.PICHON, M. 1977. Recent studies on the reefcorals of the Philippine Islands and theirPACIFIC SCIENCE, Volume 39, July 1985zoogeography. Proc. 3rd Internat. CoralReef Symp., Miami 149-154.ROSEN, B. R. 1968. An account of a patho-genic structure in the Faviidae (Anthozoa):A revision of Favia valenciennesi (Edwards& Haime) and its allies. Bull. Brit. Mus.(Nat. Hist.) Zool. 16(8): 325-352.VERON, J . V. N., M. PICHON, and M. WUSMAN-BEST. 1977. Scleractinia of eastern Aus-tralia, part 2. Families Faviidae and Tra-chyphylliidae. Austral. Inst. Mar. Sci.Monogr. Ser. 3: 1-233.WUSMAN-BEST, M. 1977. Indo-Pacific coralspecies belonging to the subfamily Mon-tastreinae Vaughan & Wells, 1943 (Scler-actinia-Coelenterata) part 1. The generaMontastrea and Plesiastrea. Zool. Medd .Leiden 52(7): 81-97.

A New Species of Montastrea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) from the Philippines

http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/933/1/v39n3-283-290.pdf

A New Species of Montastrea (Cnidaria, Scleractinia) from the Philippines

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa