The paper deals with abrasive waterjet titanium tangential turning. Titanium grade 3 with a diameter of 55 mm was
used as an experimental material. Technological conditions of turning tests were the same by gradually changing
value of traverse speed (vf = 1,5; 3; 4,5; 6; 7,5 mm·min-1). Experiment tests were performed by using continuous abrasive
waterjet of pressure p = 400MPa, by rotation n = 60 rpm of workpiece. The abrasive particles (Barton Garnet)
were fed to the waterjet in the amount of 0,4 kg·min-1. It was determined that acceleration of traverse speed did not
increase the surface profile parameters.Web of Science53454053

Cárach, Ján

Hlavatý, Ivo

Hlaváček, Petr

Hloch, Sergej

Klich, Jiří

Klichová, Dagmar

Kozak, Dražan

Samardžić, Ivan

Vasilko, Karol

Ščučka, Jiří

DSpace at VSB Technical University of Ostrava

537METALURGIJA 53 (2014) 4, 537-540S. HLOCH, J. HLAVÁČEK, K. VASILKO, J. CÁRACH, I. SAMARDŽIĆ, D. KOZAK, I. HLAVATÝ, J. J. ŠČUČKA, KLICH, D. KLICHOVÁABRASIVE WATERJET (AWJ) TITANIUM TANGENTIAL TURNING EVALUATIONReceived – Prispjelo: 2013-12-05Accepted – Prihvaćeno: 2014-04-15Original Scientific Paper – Izvorni znanstveni radISSN 0543-5846METABK 53(4) 537-540 (2014)UDC – UDK 669.295.004.6:621.924.9:622.752=111 S. Hloch, K. Vasilko, J. Cárach, D. Lehocká Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies, with a seat in Prešov, Prešov, Slovak RepublicS.Hloch, J. Hlaváček, J. Klich, D. Klichová Intitute of Geonics Acad-emy of Science v.v.i. Ostrava – Poruba, Czech RepublicI. Samardžić, D. Kozak Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod, CroatiaI. Hlavatý Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB-Technical Univer-sity of OstravaThe paper deals with abrasive waterjet titanium tangential turning. Titanium grade 3 with a diameter of 55 mm was used as an experimental material. Technological conditions of turning tests were the same by gradually changing value of traverse speed (vf = 1,5; 3; 4,5; 6; 7,5 mm·min-1). Experiment tests were performed by using continuous abra-sive waterjet of pressure p = 400MPa, by rotation n = 60 rpm of workpiece. The abrasive particles (Barton Garnet) were fed to the waterjet in the amount of 0,4 kg·min-1. It was determined that acceleration of traverse speed did not increase the surface profile parameters.Key words: titanium, abrasive waterjet turning, traverse speedINTRODUCTIONTitanium and the titanium alloy are classed as hard machining materials, and the material removal differs from other alloy machining. Material removal speed is lower than in steel machining. Blunting tool durability is influenced by the size of flank wear and cutting edge de-formation. Cutting power is smaller than in machining of pure iron and nickel. Currently, cutting speed is under the limit of 60 m·min-1. It is necessary to take into account creation of tool vibration, which is created by uneven plastic deformations. Unstable deformation character is obviously related to segmentation of titans chip (Figure 1). That process is influenced by strength reduction and hardening deformation. Poor heat conductivity of titani-um workpiece causes lines creation of concentrated skid. The heat energy is concentrated in those lines. Adhe-sion occurs by machining of titanium alloy and these effects cause high intensity of tool depreciation.High speed waterjet is used to increase the tool du-rability, ensuring chip breaking, friction reducing and cooling (Figure 2). Habak and Lebrun [1] studied this method by using conventional turning of stainless steel compared with dry turning. MATERIALS AND METHODThe 2D X-Y cutting table PTV WJ2020-2Z-1xPJ with inclinable cutting head, specially designed for cut-ting with water and abrasive water jet was used in tests (Figure 3). The water pressure was generated by PTV75-60 pump with two pressure intensifiers (operating pres-sure of 40 ÷ 415 MPa, max. flow of 7,8 l·min-1 at 415 MPa). Turned traces were created at pressure p = 400 MPa using focusing tube with a diameter df = 1,02 mm. Figure 1 Creation of Chip Segments by MachiningFigure 2 Utilization of High-speed Waterjet [1]538  METALURGIJA 53 (2014) 4, 537-540S. HLOCH et al.: ABRASIVE WATERJET (AWJ) TITANIUM TANGENTIAL TURNING EVALUATIONAn offset radial mode was used to set the right posi-tion of the workpiece and the AWJ. The AWJ turning was realized on the cutting table of Geonics Academy of Science of Czech Republic, v.v.i., Ostrava Poruba. The titanium workpiece was clamped between the jaws of the Festo company power chuck.The method of AWJ down turning was applied.Barton Garnet was used as abrasive particles. The size of garnet grains was approximately 0,18 to 0,35 µm (MESH 80). [2]Experimental conditions are listed in the Table 1. The material removal was done as microerosion process of abrasive particles, influencing high-speed water and rotating workpiece surface. [3]By AWJ cutting and machining, this process was re-alized in three mechanisms (microchip formation, plow-ing and rubbing), which took place through shear defor-mation. It was very important to set up many techno-logical factors for right material removal. [4]The reaction by AWJ turning of titanium workpiece was very interesting. Abrasive garnet particles dispersed in the high-speed water impact on the titanium surface. Figure 3 Experimental set-up of AWJHigh friction increased temperature of titanium parti-cles, causing it to create sparks and chips burning (Fig-ure 4). It is known that titanium has been reacting to fine machining (chips ignition) and that such burning is not possible to be extinguished with water.RESULTSThe surface roughness created by continuous water-jet was measured by an optical profilometer MicroProf FRT, using sensor SEN 000 03 (Figure 5) at the Institute of Geonics AS CR, v.v.i. The 3D plot of surface was compiled from lines for sample with the following mea-surement parameters: measurement area 37 x 5,5 mm, vertical resolution 4 μm, accuracy 1 μm, linearity 0,1 %, lateral resolution 5 μm, number of measurement traces 1111 Table 2. Table 2 Measurement ConditionsForm removal LineNoise fi lter cut-off / ls 25 µmISO 4287Cut-off  wavelength,/lc 2,5 mmNumber of cut-off s 1Evaluation length 2,5 mmThis profilometer is distinguished by high reliability and strong versatility. It can be adapted to many appli-cations due to its modular construction.Table 1 Experiment set-upFactors Unit Value DimensionPressure p 400 MPaOrifi ce diameter do 0,33 mmFocusing tube diameter df 1,02 mmDepth of cut ap 2 mmStand off  distance z 10 mmAbrasive mass fl ow rate ma 0,4 kg·min-1Workpiece diameter dw 55 mmFigure 4 AWJ Turning process of Titanium Workpiece 539METALURGIJA 53 (2014) 4, 537-540S. HLOCH et al.: ABRASIVE WATERJET (AWJ) TITANIUM TANGENTIAL TURNING EVALUATIONMeasurement results showed irregularity of rough-ness, where the values did not increase along with the increased traverse speed vf (Table 3).Table 3 Values of Measured Roughness vf /mm·min-1 Ra/µm Rq/µm Rz/µm1,5 6,984 8,859 47,7643 5,438 6,583 31,9884,5 10,687 12,686 60,8496 7,317 8,806 45,2117,5 8,308 11,191 57,879The following Figures 6-10 show surface after abra-sive water jet turning. Surface profile parameters (Table 3) were obtained within the white section.The 3D surface image (Figure 11) was made by using laser confocal microscope Olympus LEXT OLS 3100 including surface texture in real color (Figure 12). Figure 5 Profilometer MicroProf FRTFigure 6  Surface Roughness profile created as vf  = 1,5 mm·min-1 Figure 7  Surface Roughness profile created as vf  = 3 mm·min-1 Figure 8  Surface Roughness profile created as vf  = 4,5 mm·min-1Figure 9  Surface Roughness profile created as vf  = 6 mm·min-1Figure 10  Surface Roughness profile created as vf  = 7,5 mm·min-1Figure 11 3D View of Titanium Surface Spread in StraightawayFigure 12 Machined Titanium surface using AWJ, (Zoom 20 x ) 540  METALURGIJA 53 (2014) 4, 537-540S. HLOCH et al.: ABRASIVE WATERJET (AWJ) TITANIUM TANGENTIAL TURNING EVALUATIONCONCLUSIONSTesting of roughness of titanium workpiece surface with a diameter of 55 mm measured by the AWJ tech-nology and by the selected experimental conditions re-sulted in conclusion that the increase of traverse speed did not influence roughness rectilinear. The surface roughness was higher by traverse speed of 1,5 mm·min-1 than by 3 mm·min-1 and 4,5 mm·min-1 and 6 mm·min-1. As of Figure 11, it was determined that the increase of traverse speed caused diameter change. Abrasive particles that dispersed in the high-speed water had less time for material removal. Machining of extra hard materials is an up-to-date topic of research and many authors [5 - 7] addressed the problem so far. Królczyk et al. [5] studied wear of tool and durability in machining of stainless steel. It was concluded that the increase of cutting speed increased the wear intensity of tool cutting edge by turning. There is a need to perform further research into ma-chining by using the abrasive waterjet method and turn-ing the titanium workpiece, since this technology is offer-ing a real possibility for extra hard materials machining.AcknowledgementThe research is supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-207-12. Experiments were supported by the Institute of clean technologies for mining and utilization of raw materials for energy use, reg. no. CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0082, as well as by the Research and Development Innova-tions Operational Programme financed by the Structural Funds of the European Union and the Czech Republic state budget, within the long-term conceptual develop-ment of research institution RVO: 68145535.The authors would like to thank the Institute of Geonics, Academy of Science of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic, for providing support to experiment realization.REFERENCES[1] M. Habak, J. Lebrun An experimental study of the effect of high-pressure water jet assisted turning (HPWJAT) on the surface integrity In: International Journal of Machine Tool & Manufacture 51 (2011) 661-669.[2] M. Karková, L. Sobotová Abrasive materials used in AWJ cutting of material technology, Katedra environmentalisti-ky, Transfer inovácií 25/2013. URL: http://www.sjf.tuke.sk/transferinovacii/pages/archiv/transfer/25-2013/pdf/146-149.pdf. ( 28-Sep-2013).[3] R. Manu, R.N. Babu, An erosion-based model for abrasive waterjet turning of ductile materials In: Science Direct, Wear 266 (2009), 1091-1097.[4] D.Arola, M. Ramulu Material removal in abrasive waterjet machining of metals Surface integrity and texture In: Science Direct, Wear 210 (1997), 50-58.[5]  G. Królczyk, S. Legutko, P. Raos Cutting wedge wear exami-nation during turning of duplex stainless steel In: Techni-cal Gazette, 20 (2013), 3, 413-418.[6] G. Królczyk, M. Gajek, S. Legutko Effect of the cutting parameters impact on tool life in duplex stainless steel tur-ning process In: Technical Gazette, 20(2013), 3, 587-592.[7] Šimunovic, G., Šimunović, K., Šarić, T. et al. Modelling and simulation of surface roughness in face milling In: In-ternational Journal of Simulation Modelling, 12 (2013), 3, 141-153Note:  The responsible person for English language is prof. Martina Šuto, M.A., J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek.

Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) titanium tangential turning evaluation

http://dspace.vsb.cz/bitstream/10084/105793/1/MET_53_4_537_540_Hloch.pdf

Abrasive waterjet (AWJ) titanium tangential turning evaluation

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

DSpace at VSB Technical University of Ostrava