We present a correctness proof of a graph-directed variational geometric constraint solver. First, we prove that the graph reduction that establishes the sequence in which to apply the construction steps defines a terminating confluent reduction system, in the case of well-constrained graphs. For overconstrained problems there may not be a unique normal form. Underconstrained problems, on the other hand, do have a unique normal form. Second, we prove that all geometric solutions found using simple root-selection rules must place certain triples of elements in the same topological order, no matter which graph reduction sequence they are based on. Moreover, we prove that this implies that the geometric solutions derived by different reduction sequences must be congruent. Again, this result does not apply to overconstrained problems. Keywords: geometric constraint solving, computer aided design 1. Introduction Geometric constraint solving has broad applications in a wide range of subje..
