research

Case Study on Causes and Countermeasures of a Largely Deformed Reinforced Earth Wall with Geotextile in Hyogo, Japan

Abstract

International Symposium on Backwards Problem in Geotechnical Engineering and Monitoring of Geo-Construction, Green Hall, Kensetsu-Koryu-kan, 2011/07/14-15This study examines causes and countermeasures of large deformation that took place on the reinforced earth wall, a part of the Tottori expressway planned to pass Hyogo, Japan. Since this reinforced earth wall had experienced unexpected deformation of the wall during construction, the wall was re-constructed twice. However, the wall deformation showed no sign to cease even at the final stage of the construction. In this paper, case study was carried out on the interpretation of the mechanical behavior of the severely damaged reinforced earth wall comprising geotextile with the concrete panel facing. At First, the outline of the damaged reinforced earth wall is in detail described. The background and cause of the damage are discussed based on the results of site investigation. The engineering properties of the fill were examined by performing various insitu and laboratory tests, including the surface wave survey (SWS), PS-logging, RI-logging, soaking test, the direct shear box (DSB) test, bender element (BE) test, etc. Consequently, the background as well as the cause for the damage of the wall may be described such that i) a considerable amount of settlement took place over a 3m thick weak soil layer in the lower part of the reinforced earth due to seepage of rainfall water, ii) the weight of the upper fill was partially supported by the geo-textile hooked on the concrete panels (n.b., named conveniently "hammock state" in this paper), and iii) the concrete panels to form the hammock were severely damaged by the unexpectedly large downwards compression force triggered by the tension force of the geotextile. And then, numerical analysis was carried out in order to simulate the development of the large deformation that took place on the reinforced earth wall and countermeasures to re-stabilize the wall were demanded. As the results of site investigation, it was manifested that subsidence of a 3-meter weak soil due to seepage flow was responsible for the large deformation. A part of concrete panel wall was severely damaged due to extremely large pulling force of geotextile induced by the hammock state. As for the countermeasures, "grouting with slag system" was applied to fill voids of the backfill, and also to prevent further development of settlement in the weak soil layer. "Ground anchor" was also considered to achieve the prescribed factor of safety

    Similar works