Native warm-season grasses can provide large amounts of high-quality forage during the midsummer months. Maximum potential benefits depend on management of the entire cool-and warm-season grazing system. This study compared two grazing systems for the warm-season pasture component. Fall-born steers grazed pastures of \u27Cave-in-Rock\u27 switchgrass or \u27Roundtree\u27 big bluestem over three years using either continuous or rotational grazing systems. Pasture carrying time for switchgrass and bluestem pastures and steer weight gain were considerably higher for the rotational grazing program than for the continuous grazing regimen

Barnhart, Stephen K.

Buxton, Dwayne R.

George, J. Ronald

Moore, Kenneth J.

Native warm-season grasses can provide large amounts of high-quality forage during the midsummer months. Maximum potential benefits depend on management of the entire cool-and warm-season grazing system. This study compared two grazing systems for the warm-season pasture component. Fall-born steers grazed pastures of 'Cave-in-Rock' switchgrass or 'Roundtree' big bluestem over three years using either continuous or rotational grazing systems. Pasture carrying time for switchgrass and bluestem pastures and steer weight gain were considerably higher for the rotational grazing program than for the continuous grazing regimen.</p

Buxton, Dwayne

Barnhart, Stephen

Moore, Kenneth

Digital Repository @ Iowa State University (ISU)

93-06 COMPETITIVE GRANT Leopold Center REPORT LEOPOLD CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE Principal Investigator: J. Ronald George Agronomy Iowa State University Co-investigators: Dwayne R. Buxton USDA-ARS Stephen K. Barnhart Agronomy Extension Iowa State University Kenneth J. Moore Agronomy Iowa State University Producer Advisors: Ron Dunphy Creston, Iowa Stephen J. Reinart Glidden, Iowa Budget: $21,654 for year one $23,424 for year two $25,094 for year three Animal and plant responses for steers grazing switchgrass and big bluestem pastures Abstract: Native warm-season grasses can provide large amounts of high-quality forage during the midsummer months. Maximum potential benefits depend on management of the entire cool-and warm-season grazing system. This study compared two grazing systems for the warm-season pasture component. Fall-born steers grazed pastures of 'Cave-in-Rock' switchgrass or 'Roundtree' big bluestem over three years using either continuous or rotational grazing systems. Pasture carrying time for switchgrass and bluestem pastures and steer weight gain were considerably higher for the rotational grazing program than for the continuous grazing regimen. Background Switchgrass and big bluestem were two major species in the original tall grass prairies of North America and they supply high-quality forages during the hot, dry summer months. Both these grasses work well for summer pasture and hay utilization, but switchgrass is more popular because its small seeds make seeding and uniform stand establishment easier to accomplish. Grazing studies done in sev­eral states have documented the potential con­tributions of perennial, warm-season grasses to summer pasture compared to cool-season grasses. Bud development and morphological devel­opment are important management consider­ations for warm-season grasses. Some studies suggest that rotational grazing designed to remove the growing point of the tillers might result in a more productive season. However, early removal of tillers could also reduce potential growth and productivity. One study stated that big bluestem may be the single best warm-season grass for the north central United States because it remains palat­able for a long time and normally reaches heading stage two to three weeks later than switchgrass. It is, however, harder to establish than switchgrass. Other research reports that early partial defoliation of switchgrass causes no serious problems and may even improve some qualities for livestock use. Four specific objectives of this project were: 1) To compare beef steer performances from rotational vs. continuous grazing systems of warm-season grasses 2) To compare beef steer performances on switchgrass vs. big bluestem pastures for each grazing system 3) To record total season beef steer perfor­mance for spring (cool-season pasture) and summer (warm-season pasture) 4) To evaluate plant responses to grazing. Approach and methods The experiment site at the Iowa State Univer­sity Western Research Farm near Castana, Iowa, was divided into four main pasture ar­eas; in 1991 two were seeded to "Cave-in-Rock' switchgrass and two to 'Roundtree' big bluestem. The switchgrass pastures were re­seeded in 1992 to achieve a more uniform stand. Eight paddocks were created and two of each were randomly assigned a grazing treat­ment; either switchgrass grazed rotationally, switchgrass grazed continuously, big bluestem grazed rotationally, or big bluestem grazed continuously. Pastures were fertilized annu­ally in early spring before grass growth with 100 to 120 pounds per acre of N. In 1993, for the continuous treatment, the switchgrass paddock was grazed for 42 days and the big bluestem for 28 days. The rota­tional paddocks were both grazed for 14 days initially, then given a 28-day rest and regrowth Volume 6 (1997) 16 period before being grazed a second time. A similar schedule was followed in 1994. The actual grazing periods and steer stocking rates for all treatments were determined by the growth stage of the grass and available herbage. Animal response measurements: The grazing herd included fall-born steers of 225-275 kg. (500 to 600 lbs.). They were weighed at the introduction to and withdrawal from warm-season paddocks and at two week intervals when grazing. Plant response measurements: Grazing re­striction cages (GRCs) were constructed to house grass samples unaffected by the grazing animals. Measurements were taken weekly during grazing periods, both inside and outside the GRCs, to provide data on forage intake by steers and changes in forage quality over the grazing period. Grazing heights: Target grazing heights var­ied with grazing treatment and period. Rota­tional grazing for the first period began when vegetation was 12 to 15 inches high and ended when vegetation was grazed to a 4-inch height. The second grazing period, begun after four weeks rest, ended when stubble height was 8 inches for switchgrass and 6 inches for big bluestem. Continuous grazing of switchgrass began in late June and continuous grazing of big bluestem started about two weeks later. Continuous grazing for both grasses ended when most of the leaf blades had been selec­tively grazed, steers refused the trampled for­age, and daily weight gains were no longer acceptable. Quality analyses: The in vitro dry matter di­gestibility of herbage samples was determined by using the in vitro rumen fermentation sys­tem. Crude protein was determined by the Kjeldahl method. Results and discussion Animal responses: Steer average daily gain (ADG) over three years was .28 pounds/day greater for big bluestem than for switchgrass during the first period of rotational grazing. For the second rotational grazing period, steer ADG on big bluestem was 3.12 pounds/day or .68 pounds/day greater than that of steers din­ing on switchgrass, which is impressive for midsummer grazing. Gains of steers grazing warm season grasses are even more impres­sive when compared with relatively low ADG for steers grazing cool-season pastures before grazing either the first or second period on warm-season paddocks. Steers on cool-sea-son pasture diets gained as little as 1.29 pound/ day before they grazed switchgrass in mid­summer and .44 pound/day before they grazed on midsummer big bluestem. Pasture carrying capacity was much greater for rotationally grazed switchgrass and big bluestem than for their continually grazed coun­terparts. Carrying capacity was 2.15 times greater for switchgrass under rotation rather than continuous feeding. Rotationally grazed big bluestem had a carrying capacity 2.58 times higher than the continuously grazed va­riety. The largest differences between grazing systems most likely result from more efficient utilization (less trampling) of forage and the higher-quality forage available under the rota­tional system. Steer live-weight gain per acre (LWG) achieved on the rotational switchgrass paddocks was substantial. Over the project's three years, animal gains on switchgrass averaged 472 pounds/acre. The totals for rotationally grazed big bluestem were somewhat lower (354 pounds/acre), but still good. It is especially Big bluestem was a major species in the original tallgrass prairies of North America. Leopold Center Progress Reports 17 significant that these gains were achieved dur- Herbage dry matter (DM) above the targeted ing grazing periods of only 35 to 48 days, minimum grazing height was measured both respectively, for switchgrass and big bluestem. inside and outside the GRCs for each grazing For the total grazing season, cattle grazing on system at the outset and at weekly intervals the rotational switchgrass paddocks had LWGs throughout the grazing period. These mea-2.76 times higher than those on the continuous surements helped determine suitable stocking grazing sites. LWGs for steers on big bluestem rates for the pastures, as well as providing an were 1.81 times better on rotational than con- estimation for the amount of forage consumed tinuous grazing. from week to week. This estimation cannot be made as effectively in a continuous grazing Plant responses: Researchers had hoped to measure plant responses for all three years. system because forage is trampled below the targeted grazing height. Weed and cool-season grass invasions during the third year resulted in very difficult and For the early rotational grazing period, herb-unreliable plant sampling, so no sampling was age DM decreased linearly during the two-done in the third year. week period for both switchgrass and big bluestem in 1993, and approached a value near Warm-season grass herbage was character- zero in both cases. Herbage dry matter yield ized at the initiation of grazing for each pad- was similar for switchgrass in the first period dock. Tiller density varied for both grasses in of both years. By the second stage, DM in the both years studied, but the morphological de- GRCs was twice as great in 1993 compared velopment was very similar at the beginning of with 1994, although DM within the pasture the rotational grazing in 1993 and 1994. The itself was similar for both years. Trends in grazing of big bluestem was delayed for two rotational grazing systems illustrate the rapid weeks in an effort to graze both species at growth of warm-season grasses during the about the same stage of morphological devel­ summer and their rapid decline in productivity opment. However, even though big bluestem in August. Plants change physiologically, ei-follows switchgrass by two weeks in develop­ ther becoming reproductive or reducing their ment, the herbage quality is similar to that for growth rates at this point. switchgrass at the same approximate calendar date. Continuous grazing systems showed greatly differing amounts of DM between years. For Plant canopy heights were measured as each switchgrass, DM was almost twice as great in grazing period began and at weekly intervals 1994 than in 1993 for both cage and pasture after that. The differences in canopy height measurements during the entire grazing pe­that appeared were likely because of weather riod. Dry matter was much greater in 1994 variability between years. Plant vigor in the than 1993 for big bluestem grazed continu­second year of grazing has been shown to be ously, but not to the degree of switchgrass. somewhat less than the first grazing year, which would contribute to shorter canopies. Switchgrass reached its targeted minimum grazing height after two weeks of grazing in 1993, and after only eight days in 1994. For all systems during both years, steers were removed even though large amounts of DM remained in the paddock. Much of the remain­ing DM was low-quality stem material, and daily live-weight gains had become unaccept-Grazing heights must be interpreted carefully. able. Trampling in the continuously grazed big bluestem made grazing heights difficult to Forage (herbage) quality was gauged in sev­correlate to actual steer consumption of foli­ eral areas. Extremely high herbage digestibil­age. Likewise, cattle stripped leaf blades from the continually grazed switchgrass while leav­ing many stems standing upright. ity was measured during the early period of grazing for rotational systems. Switchgrass digestibility values were about 10 units higher than for big bluestem in 1993 and equal in 18 Volume 6 (1997) digestibility to high-quality alfalfa. The some­what lower values for big bluestem illustrate the lower quality of big bluestem compared with that for switchgrass at similar growth stages. For the second period of rotational grazing, the digestibility measure of both grasses was still similar to that observed at the end of the first grazing period. This points up a major advantage for rotational grazing vs. continuous grazing. The early partial defolia­tion of warm-season grasses promotes mid­summer regrowth that is less stemmy and more easily digestible. During the same grazing period, continuous grazing systems were much lower in herbage quality than the rotational systems. Switch­grass and big bluestem herbage varied from 5 to 10 percentage units lower in digestibility under the continuous system. It should be noted that relatively low digestibility is not as serious as it might seem because livestock selectively strip leaves from stems and leaf digestibility is much greater than whole plant digestibility. Very high crude protein (CP) concentrations were found weekly during both years in for­ages from the rotationally grazed paddocks. Early grazing period switchgrass CP levels were similar to those in high-quality alfalfa. One possible reason for the high CP levels in 1993 is that the paddocks were burned off earlier in the season and this can increase herbage CP as well as digestibility. When the steers were returned to the rotational grazing paddocks (after a four-week rest and regrowth period), forage CP levels were simi­lar to those when the steers were removed a month earlier. This suggests that early, inten­sive grazing forced plants to produce regrowth and new tillers. The new growth had a much greater leaf: stem ratio with higher protein and digestibility values. Levels of CP were much greater for rotationally grazed systems than for continuously grazed systems when com­pared at similar calendar dates. Forage CP deterioration during the growing season varied between grass species, grazing systems, and years. Forage CP in the rotationally grazed switchgrass paddocks dropped linearly in the summer, until it reached about 11.5 percent and then stabilized. For rotationally grazed big bluestem, forage CP declined linearly in 1993 and fluctuated in 1994. Switchgrass grazed continuously de­clined in CP during the grazing period for both years, eventually to a rather consistent level of 9 to 9.5 percent. CP concentrations for big bluestem were lower in 1994 than in 1993; running about 3 percentage units less on any given day. Conclusions Results indicate that a major advantage exists for producers who adopt a rotational grazing management system similar to that used in this study. Benefits include: 1) a brief rest and regrowth period for the cool-season pastures, 2) an extended spring and early summer graz­ing period for the cool-season pastures with increased productivity of those pastures, 3) less trampling and waste in the warm-season pasture, 4) improved summer herbage quality of the warm season pasture, 5) an increase in both average daily gain and steer days of grazing per acre for animals on warm-season pastures, and 6) two to three times as much total steer gain per acre compared with that for continu­ous grazing. Switchgrass has small seeds that make seeding and uniform stand establishment easier to accomplish. Leopold Center Progress Reports 19 Although a four-week rest and recovery growth period between the two periods of rotational grazing was used in this study, recent research information suggests that the rest period should be five to six weeks to allow plants to replenish total storage reserves. Close monitoring of the pasture, including grass tillering, canopy heights, grazing height changes during graz­ing period, and proper stocking rates is critical. Careful oversight will minimize weed and cool season grass invasion and maximize per­sistence, productivity, and quality of forages for pasture grazing. Implications Producers are more likely to retain warm-season grasses that were established as seed­ing on their highly erodible and fragile land in the ten-year CRP (Conservation Reserve Pro­gram) if it can be demonstrated that these pastures are productive, both in offering high-quality forage and in promoting animal growth. Additionally, farmers are more inclined to continue seedings of long-term perennial stands of warm-season grasses if the economic value is clear. Most livestock producers—especially beef pro-ducers—would benefit from a diverse cool-season/warm-season pasture program. A very simple rotational grazing system consisting of a two-week short duration, intensive grazing period beginning June 1, followed by a four-week rest and recovery growth period (five to six weeks of rejuvenation now seems very important) offers many advantages. It can eliminate the serious forage trampling situa­tion, provide an abundant supply of high-quality forage in summer when it is needed most, and also results in a tremendous increase in daily and seasonal livestock performance. Education and outreach Research results from this project were widely disseminated at sites ranging from two ISU classes to national professional meetings. Pre­sentations were made at field days held at the Castana Western Research Farm in 1994 and 1996. Participants at the 1995 and 1996 Man­agement Intensive Grazing Symposiums in Des Moines were informed about the study. Poster presentations were made at the 1996 ISU Agronomy Days and at the American Society of Agronomy annual meeting. An audience of about 400 at the American Forage and Grassland Council Annual Conference heard a presentation about the research find­ings. Steve Barnhart, ISU Forage Extension Agronomist, and Bob Dayton, State Agrono­mist with the NRCS, informed numerous con­tacts about the project. Beef producers would benefit from a diverse cool-season/warm-season pasture grazing program. For more information contact J. Ronald George, Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011; (515) 294-2143; e-mail rgeorge @iastate. edu. Volume 6 (1997) 20 

English

Animal and plant responses for steers grazing switchgrass and big bluestem pastures

https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/52901

Animal and plant responses for steers grazing switchgrass and big bluestem pastures

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Digital Repository @ Iowa State University (ISU)