This study presents an updated characterization of the Portuguese
Web derived from a crawl of 48 million contents belonging to
all media types (2.5 TB of data), performed in March, 2008. The resulting
data was analyzed to characterize contents, sites and domains. This
study was performed within the scope of the Portuguese Web Archive.POSC/EU, UMI

Demarzo, Marcelo Marcos Piva [UNIFESP]

Garcia-Campayo, Javier

Gascon, Santiago

Montero-Marin, Jesus

Prado-Abril, Javier

PLoS ONE

PubMed

Jesus Montero-Marin

Javier Prado-Abril

Marcelo Marcos Piva Demarzo

Santiago Gascon

Javier García-Campayo

Crossref

Coping with Stress and Types of Burnout: Explanatory Power of Different Coping Strategies

BackgroundBurnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. The dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. The aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions -overload, lack of development and neglect- as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.ResultsThe 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (pConclusionsThese findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace

Directory of Open Access Journals

Coping with stress and types of burnout: explanatory power of different coping strategies.

Miranda, João

Gomes, Daniel

Repositório Comum

An Updated Portrait of the Portuguese Web

Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health PromotionHealth Sciences Institute of Aragon (IACS)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. the dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. the aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions - overload, lack of development and neglect-as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.Results: the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (p<0.001), 9% of the 'lack of development' (p<0.001), and 21% of the 'neglect' (p<0.001). 'Overload' was mainly explained by 'venting of emotions' (Beta = 0.34; p, 0.001); 'lack of development' by 'cognitive avoidance' (Beta = 0.21; p, 0.001); and 'neglect' by 'behavioural disengagement' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed.Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace.Univ Zaragoza, Fac Hlth Sci & Sports, Huesca, SpainUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychiat, Zaragoza, SpainMiguel Servet Univ Hosp, Psychiat Serv, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychol, Teruel, SpainREDIAPP Red Invest Actividades Prevent & Promoc S, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilResearch Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion: RD06/0018/0017Web of Scienc

LAReferencia - Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas Latinoamericanas

Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. the dimensions of 'overload', 'lack of development' and 'neglect', belonging to the 'frenetic', 'under-challenged' and 'worn-out' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. the aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the 'Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire', with its three dimensions - overload, lack of development and neglect-as dependent variables, and the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies.Results: the 'Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences' subscales together explained 15% of the 'overload' (p<0.001), 9% of the 'lack of development' (p<0.001), and 21% of the 'neglect' (p<0.001). 'Overload' was mainly explained by 'venting of emotions' (Beta = 0.34; p, 0.001); 'lack of development' by 'cognitive avoidance' (Beta = 0.21; p, 0.001); and 'neglect' by 'behavioural disengagement' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed.Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace.Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health PromotionHealth Sciences Institute of Aragon (IACS)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Zaragoza, Fac Hlth Sci & Sports, Huesca, SpainUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychiat, Zaragoza, SpainMiguel Servet Univ Hosp, Psychiat Serv, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Zaragoza, Dept Psychol, Teruel, SpainREDIAPP Red Invest Actividades Prevent & Promoc S, Zaragoza, SpainUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilResearch Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion: RD06/0018/0017Web of Scienc

Repositório Institucional UNIFESP

Background: Burnout occurs when professionals use ineffective coping strategies to try to protect themselves from work-related stress. The dimensions of ''overload'', ''lack of development'' and ''neglect'', belonging to the ''frenetic'', ''underchallenged'' and ''worn-out'' subtypes, respectively, comprise a brief typological definition of burnout. The aim of the present study was to estimate the explanatory power of the different coping strategies on the development of burnout subtypes. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a random sample of university employees, stratified by occupation (n = 429). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the ''Burnout Clinical Subtypes Questionnaire'', with its three dimensions -overload, lack of development and neglect- as dependent variables, and the ''Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences'', with its fifteen dimensions, as independent variables. Adjusted multiple determination coefficients and beta coefficients were calculated to evaluate and compare the explanatory capacity of the different coping strategies. Results: The ''Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences'' subscales together explained 15% of the ''overload'' (p<0.001), 9% of the ''lack of development'' (p<0.001), and 21% of the ''neglect'' (p<0.001). ''Overload'' was mainly explained by ''venting of emotions'' (Beta = 0.34; p<0.001); ''lack of development'' by ''cognitive avoidance'' (Beta = 0.21; p<0.001); and ''neglect'' by ''behavioural disengagement'' (Beta = 0.40; p<0.001). Other interesting associations were observed. Conclusions: These findings further our understanding of the way in which the effectiveness of interventions for burnout may be improved, by influencing new treatments and preventive programmes using features of the strategies for handling stress in the workplace

Montero-Marin, J.

Prado-Abril, J.

Piva Demarzo, M. M.

Gascon, S.

García-Campayo, J.

Repositorio Universidad de Zaragoza

English

Coping with stress and types of burnout: Explanatory power of different coping strategies

An Updated Portrait of the Portuguese Web

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions