Disability, technology and e‐learning: challenging conception

Seale, Jane

English

In considering the role that technology and e-learning can play in helping students access higher education and an effective learning experience, a large amount of the current research and practice literature focuses almost exclusively on accessibility legislation, guidelines and standards, and the rules contained within them (Abascal et al., 2004; Chisholm &amp; Brewer, 2005; Gunderson &amp; May, 2005; Paolucci, 2004; Reed et al., 2004; Slatin, 2005). One of the major problems of such an approach is that it has drawn higher education practitioners into thinking that their objective is to comply with rules. I argue that it is not (Seale, 2006). The objective should be to address the needs of students. The danger of only focusing on rules is that it can constrain thinking and therefore practice. We need to expand our thinking beyond that of how to comply with rules, towards how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, within the local contexts that students and practitioners are working. In thinking about how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, practitioners will need to develop their own tools. These tools might be user case studies, evaluation methodologies or conceptualizations:DOI: 10.1080/09687760500480025</jats:p

Jane Seale

Crossref

Research in Learning Technology

Disability, technology and e-learning: challenging conceptions

In considering the role that technology and e-learning can play in helping students access higher education and effective learning experience a large amount of the current research and practice literature focuses almost exclusively on accessibility legislation, guidelines and standards and the rules contained within them One of the major problems of such an approach is that it has drawn higher education practitioners into thinking that their objective is to comply with rules. I argue that it is not . The objective should be to address the needs of students. The danger of only focusing on rules is that it can constrain thinking and therefore practice. We need to expand our thinking beyond that of how to comply with rules, towards how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, within the local contexts that students and practitioners are working. In thinking about how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, practitioners will need to develop their own tools. These tools might be user case studies, evaluation methodologies or conceptualizations

Southampton (e-Prints Soton)

In considering the role that technology and e-learning can play in helping students access higher education and an effective learning experience, a large amount of the current research and practice literature focuses almost exclusively on accessibility legislation, guidelines and standards, and the rules contained within them (Abascal et al., 2004; Chisholm &amp; Brewer, 2005; Gunderson &amp; May, 2005; Paolucci, 2004; Reed et al., 2004; Slatin, 2005). One of the major problems of such an approach is that it has drawn higher education practitioners into thinking that their objective is to comply with rules. I argue that it is not (Seale, 2006). The objective should be to address the needs of students. The danger of only focusing on rules is that it can constrain thinking and therefore practice. We need to expand our thinking beyond that of how to comply with rules, towards how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, within the local contexts that students and practitioners are working. In thinking about how to meet the needs of students with disabilities, practitioners will need to develop their own tools. These tools might be user case studies, evaluation methodologies or conceptualizations

Directory of Open Access Journals

Name not available

Editorial

ALT Open Access Repository

Bedding down for the long haul-philosophy of service delivery for students who have a disability or a chronic medical condition. Available online at: http://www.eophea.anu.edu.au/

Breaking down the barriers: a team approach to learning development, paper presented at

Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity (Cambridge,

Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher education: an institutional theory perspective,

Disability and e-learning in higher education: accessibility research and practice

Exams and DSA for DB. Message posed to the Deaflink JISC Mailing list. Available online at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind01&L=deaflink&T=0&F=&S=&P=477 (accessed 5

Improving online access for people with disabilities, paper presented at

Introduction to web accessibility. Available online at: http://www.webaim.org/ intro/ (accessed 5

Overview of the general techniques for web content accessibility guidelines 2.0, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,

PDF and public documents: a white paper (American Foundation for the Blind). Available online at: http://www.afb.org/section.asp?Documentid=1706 (accessed 10

Physical disability and technology, in:

Policy and provision for disabled students in higher education in Scotland and England: the current state of play,

Should online course design meet accessibility standards?,

Software accessibility standards and guidelines: progress, current status and future developments, Universal Access to the Information Society,

The development of accessibility practices in e-learning: an exploration of communities of practice,

The microchip revolution improving opportunities for students who have disabilities, paper presented at

The use of guidelines to automatically verify Web Accessibility,

Universal access and inclusion in design,

Universal design. What it is and what it isn’t. Available online at: http:// trace.wisc.edu/docs/whats_ud/whats_ud.htm (accessed

Universal design. What it is and what it isn’t. Available online at: http:// trace.wisc.edu/docs/whats_ud/whats_ud.htm (accessed 5

University students take complaints to Anti-Discrimination Commissioner. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, TV Program Transcript. Available online at: http:// www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2002/s460046.htm (accessed 5

W3C user agent accessibility guidelines test suite version 2.0 and implementation report, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,

Web content accessibility guidelines 2.0: transitioning your website, paper presented at CSUN ‘05,

Web site accessibility: what logo will we use today?,

Wising up: strategies for moving towards an inclusive model of service provision for higher education students with disabilities, paper presented at

http://repository.alt.ac.uk/126/1/ALT_J_Vol14_No1_2006_Editorial.pdf

Editorial

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Southampton (e-Prints Soton)

Directory of Open Access Journals

Name not available

ALT Open Access Repository