The purpose of this RFC is to outline a method for generating a BioBrick compatible Synthetic Promoter Library (SPL) within bacteria in order to fine-tune the expression of BioBrick parts and devices

Borch, Martin Malthe

Fortuna, Patrick

Frederiksen, Juliet

Haugaard, Anastasiya

Iversen, Lisa Blanc

Jollmann, Annemi

Kjaergaard, Maya Friis

Sander, Anja

Slodkowicz, Grzegorz

Trolle, Thomas

DSpace@MIT

 BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   1 BBF RFC 63: DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard  Patrick Fortuna*, Thomas Trolle*, Martin Malthe Borch, Anastasiya Haugaard,  Maya Friis Kjærgaard, Lisa Blanc Iversen, Annemi Jollmann, Anja Sander,  Juliet Frederiksen and Grzegorz Slodkowicz   25th October 2010  1. Purpose  The purpose of this RFC is to outline a method for generating a BioBrick compatible Synthetic Promoter Library (SPL) within bacteria in order to fine-tune the expression of BioBrick parts and devices.   2. Relation to other BBF RFCs  BBF RFC 63 does not update or replace any earlier BBF RFC.   3. Copyright Notice  Copyright © The BioBricks Foundation (2010). All Rights Reserved.   4. Introduction to Synthetic Promoter Libraries  Modulation of gene expression of i.e. cellular enzyme activities [1], as well as regulation of transcription are amongst some of the areas where SPLs are currently being used. SPL provides an alternative method for gene regulation compared to older methods, namely those of gene knockouts and strong over expression. These two methods are usually based upon apparent rate limiting steps within metabolic pathways [2].  When working with gene regulation, it is important to elucidate where expression levels are optimal for the given gene being worked on. Under these specifications it is essential to be able to have slight increments in expressional strength when attempting to optimize gene expression. This can be achieved by the usage of an SPL, where the variability in strengths can be achieved by either randomizing the spacer sequences, namely the 17 bases that reside between the -35 and -10 consensus regions, and/or some of the bases within the consensus regions, being the -35 and -10 regions.                                                   * These authors contributed equally to this work  BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   2 The spacer sequences that surround the consensus regions contribute significantly to the strengths of promoters [3]. In our design, we decided to both randomize the spacer sequences as well as two bases in both consensus regions as seen in Figure 1 below. N stands for 25% each of A, C, G and T, while S stands for 50% each of C and G, and W stands for 50% A and T.   The point of randomizing both areas is to obtain a promoter library that is not biased towards being strong. This is achieved by giving two bases within each of the consensus regions a 50% chance of being their original bases, ensuring that only 1/16 of all promoters will be strong. This is without taking into consideration the fraction of strong promoters obtainable from the randomized spacer sequences.  As previous studies indicate, consensus regions outside of the -35 and -10 regions seem to contribute very little in terms of altering promoter strengths. Mutating a single nucleotide will not change the promoter strength substantially, however mutating many nucleotides in the spacer sequences surrounding the -35 and -10 regions seem to result in the most significant alterations in promoter strengths [2]. This might be due to the three-dimensional structure that forms from the sequences that are arranged from the randomized spacer sequences [2].  Figure 1          When wanting to characterize and/or fine tune BioBrick parts and devices, using promoters that are constrained to already set strengths, has the disadvantage that the promoter might induce gene expression that is either too high or too low for the cell to be viable. This problem is nonexistent when using SPL since the SPL will necessarily give you the allowed upper and lower bounds of gene expression for cell viability. Cells with too strong or too weak promoters will simply never grow colonies.   5. Strategy for Integrating SPL into the BioBrick Assembly Standard  There are many different ways to integrate an SPL into the BioBrick Standard, and a lot of ideas were considered when creating this RFC. However, in the end a method was chosen based on the fact that it would be least time consuming for teams looking to use SPL, and at the same time, be easy to do. Instead of relying on ligations to successfully insert the SPL onto the BioBrick plasmid backbone, a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method MUST be used to not only amplify the backbone but also add the SPL onto the linear BioBrick plasmid backbone at a specific chosen site (see Figure 2). Since most teams will probably have to amplify their backbones during the course of a project, this method will only require a small amount of extra work. 5’- NNNNNWTSACANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTAWWATNNNN –3’ -35 -10 Figure 1 illustrates an SPL designed on the basis of randomizing both the spacer sequences surrounding the consensus regions (-35 and -10 regions) as well as randomizing two bases within each of the consensus regions. N stands for 25% each of A, C, G and T, while S stands for 50% each of C and G, and W stands for 50% A and T.  BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   3 Wanting to optimize gene expression and thereafter choosing a promoter that conforms to the strength that efficiently expresses your gene would be best perceivable if the SPL could be easily added and removed from BioBrick parts and/or devices. That is why the SPL will be inserted by PCR in-between the restriction sites EcoRI and XbaI of the BioBrick prefix. This way it is possible to add a part downstream of the SPL by simply ligating a part into the backbone plasmid containing SPL or by using the 3A-assembly standard. Furthermore it is also possible to move the whole insert into another BioBrick plasmid backbone if needed.   Figure 2     The design of the SPL leads to the possibility of illegal restriction sites being present within the randomized spacer sequence. If a given promoter is to be used in further ligations it MUST be sequenced first to ensure that it does not contain any recognition sites for EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI or PstI.   6. Primer Design  A PCR MUST be used in order to add the SPL onto the BioBrick plasmid backbone. The following primers for amplification of BioBrick plasmid backbones were used as a starting point for the design of our SPL primers:  i) Primer Suffix-F: 5’-ACTAGTAGCGGCCGCTGCAG-3’ ii) Primer Prefix-R: 5’-TCTAGAAGCGGCCGCGAATTC-3’  The primers were taken from http://partsregistry.org/Help:Construction_Plasmid. The restriction enzyme recognition sites are marked with the following colors: Blue – EcoRI, Green – XbaI, Red – SpeI, Turquoise – PstI.    In order to amplify and add the SPL successfully, the following modifications have been made to both of the annealing primers, which SHOULD be used: SPL E X S P pSBXXX + SPL Resistance cassette ori Figure 2 illustrates the linear BioBrick plasmid backbone with SPL inserted between the EcoRI and XbaI sites of the BioBrick prefix.  BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   4  I) Primer SPL Suffix-F: 5’-GTTTCTTCACTAGTAGCGGCCGCTGCAG-3’  For this primer, a tail with the standard seven extra bases has been added. For more information see http://openwetware.org/wiki/Synthetic_Biology:BioBricks/Part_fabrication.   Depending on which backbone needs to be amplified, one of the following SPL primers SHOULD be used:  II) Primer SPL Prefix-R-01:  5’- GTTTCTTCCTCTAGAAGCGGCNNNNATWWTANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTGTSAWNNNNNCGC GAATTCCAGAAATCATCCTTAGCG -3’  III) Primer SPL Prefix-R-02:  5’- GTTTCTTCCTCTAGAAGCGGCNNNNATWWTANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTGTSAWNNNNNCGC GAATTCGAGTCACTAAGGGC -3’  These primers have the SPL sequence inserted between the EcoRI and XbaI sites. Furthermore, 14-18 nt have been added to the 3’ end of the primer to ensure that the primers’ annealing sequences are long enough. Appendix I contains a list showing which primer to use with regard to which backbone is chosen.  Figure 3    7. Protocol   Figure 3 illustrates the primer binding sites on a BioBrick plasmid backbone as well as the final linear plasmid backbone that is generated by the PCR.  BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   5 In terms of primer annealing specificity, a touch down ramp PCR [4] MAY be used, but as Table 1 illustrates, the melting temperatures (Tm) are relatively high and therefore a standard PCR can be run instead of a touch down ramp PCR.  Table 1 Primer Tm - ºCI) Primer SPL Suffix-F 62,1II) Primer SPL Prefix-R-01 59,8III) Primer SPL Prefix-R-02 60      1. Depending on which BioBrick plasmid backbone is chosen (refer to Appendix I for the list), the selected primer pairs being either I) & II) or I) & III) SHALL be used for PCR. 2. It is RECOMMENDED that a high fidelity polymerase enzyme i.e. Finnzyme’s Phusion enzyme is used to ensure a minimal amount of mutations occur in the BioBrick plasmid backbone during amplification. 3. The following amounts of substrates SHOULD be used if Phusion polymerase enzyme is used:  PCR substrates Volumes - μLTotal volume 50Phusion Polymerase (0,02 U/μL) 0,5x5 Phusion HF buffer 10dNTP's (5μM) 2Primer SPL Suffix-F (10μM) 1,25Reverse primer, either II) or III) (10μM) 1,25Template - BioBrick plasmid backbone 1ddH2O 33,5   For other polymerase enzymes, consult the manual for the polymerase for more specific information on PCR mixtures.  4. The following program SHALL be used if Phusion polymerase enzyme is used with SPL primers:  Cycle step Temperature - ºC Time CyclesInitial denaturation 98 30 sec 1Denaturation 98 10 secAnnealing 63* 30 sec 20-25Extension 72 30 sec / kbFinal extension 72 10 min 1Hold 4 forever 1  *) When using Phusion polymerase enzyme for primers that are > 20nt, the annealing temperature SHOULD be 3ºC higher than the actual Tm. Table 1 illustrates the Tm of the SPL primers.  IDT DNA oligo analyzer was used in order to calculate the Tm. (http://eu.idtdna.com/analyzer/applications/oligoanalyzer/Default.aspx).  BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   6  For other polymerase enzymes, consult the manual for the polymerase for more specific information on PCR programs.   5. After PCR is completed, a PCR purification MUST be performed using a PCR clean up kit (e.g. Macherey-Nagel – NucleoSpin Extract II).  6. The BioBrick plasmid backbone should now contain the SPL and is ready to be used as a vector in a BioBrick assembly.   8. Summary of advantages  1. An SPL allows the fine tuning of gene expression by creating a promoter library with a wide variety of strengths.  2. The SPL will necessarily give you the allowed upper and lower bounds of gene expression for cell viability.    3. The method for creating the BioBrick compatible SPL is quick and easy to perform. The method is practically identical to the procedure for generating linear BioBrick plasmid backbones, which many teams will most likely have to do anyway.  4. Once the SPL is in the linear BioBrick plasmid backbone, it can be used in a variety of experiments. A BioBrick part or device can be ligated into the plasmid backbone and the resulting ligation can be transformed and screened for colonies containing the promoter strength needed.   9. Author’s Contact Information  Patrick Fortuna: patrick.fortuna@gmail.com Thomas Trolle: thomas.trolle@gmail.com     10. References  [1] Solem, C. and Jensen, P. R. (2002). Modulation of Gene Expression Made Easy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68(5): 2397-2403.  [2] Jensen, P. R. and Hammer, K. (1998). The Sequence of Spacers between the Consensus Sequences Modulates the Strength of Prokaryotic Promoters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64(1): 82-87.   BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   7 [3] Hammer, K., Mijakovic, I. and Jensen, P. R. (2006). Synthetic promoter libraries – tuning of gene expression. Trends in Biotechnology. 24(2): 53-55.  [4] Don, R. H et al. (1991). ‘Touchdown’ PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Research. 19 (14): 4008.  For more information see: http://2010.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/SPL_Section.        BBF RFC 63 DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard   8 Appendix I: BioBrick Plasmid Backbone Lookup Table   BioBrick Plasmid Backbone Primer II Primer III Sizes - bpspSB1A3 - 2157pSB1AC3 - 3055pSB1AK3 - 3189pSB1AT3 - 3446pSB1C3 - 2072pSB1K3 - 2206pSB1T3 - 2463pSB2K3 - 4425pSB3C5 - 2738pSB3K5 - 2936pSB3T5 - 3252pSB4A5 - 3395pSB4C5 - 3221pSB4K5 - 3419pSB4T5 - 3735Appendix I illustrates which Prefix SPL primers SHOULD be used depending on which BioBrick plamid backbone is selected for amplification. 

DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard

http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/60080/1/BBFRFC63.pdf

DTU Synthetic Promoter Library Standard

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

DSpace@MIT