La dictadura brasileña (1964-1985) desarrolló diversos mecanismos para el cuidado de la infancia y adolescencia marginal, como era denominada por el discurso oficial. Dentro de ese grupo de «menores» sinónimo de niños pobres- este artículo se propone aproximarse a los conocidos como menores delincuentes, y analizar cómo la normativa, el tratamiento y la ideología proyectados sobre esos muchachos y muchachas evolucionaron a lo largo de los años dictatoriales, como parte de las estrategias de consolidación y supervivencia del Régimen autoritario.-1. Introducción. -2. Los inicios del Derecho de Menores en Brasil. -3. Dictadura militar, Fundación de Bienestar del Menor y marginalidad social. -4. La normativa menorista y el progresivo endurecimiento del sistema dictatorial. -5. La década de 1970 y el aumento de la violencia contra los niños y niñas marginales. -6.El Código de Menores de 1979. El paradigma de la situación irregular. -7. De la Dictadura a la Democracia: ¿cambios en la consideración de la infancia delincuente? 8. Conclusiones. -Bibliografía

Clara Grilo

Jeffrey G Snodgrass

Joana Roque de Pinho

Kathleen A Galvin

Randall B Boone

PubMed

Amich Elías, Cristina - Autor/a

Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales de América Latina y El Caribe

La evolución de la legislación sobre menores de edad delincuentes en la dictadura militar brasileña

The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection (>rescuing them>), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world. Copyright: © 2014 de Pinho et al.Peer Reviewe

Roque de Pinho, Joana

Grilo, Clara

Boone, Randall B.

Galvin, Kathleen A.

Snodgrass, J.G.

Digital.CSIC

Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities

Randall B. Boone

Kathleen A. Galvin

Jeffrey G. Snodgrass

Crossref

PLoS ONE

Influence of Aesthetic Appreciation of Wildlife Species on Attitudes towards Their Conservation in Kenyan Agropastoralist Communities

The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection ("rescuing them"), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world

Directory of Open Access Journals

Influence of aesthetic appreciation of wildlife species on attitudes towards their conservation in Kenyan agropastoralist communities.

<div><p>The influence of human aesthetic appreciation of animal species on public attitudes towards their conservation and related decision-making has been studied in industrialized countries but remains underexplored in developing countries. Working in three agropastoralist communities around Amboseli National Park, southern Kenya, we investigated the relative strength of human aesthetic appreciation on local attitudes towards the conservation of wildlife species. Using semi-structured interviewing and free listing (n = 191) as part of a mixed methods approach, we first characterized local aesthetic judgments of wildlife species. With a Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) approach, we then determined the influence of perceiving four species as beautiful on local support for their protection (“rescuing them”), and of perceiving four other species as ugly on support for their removal from the area, while controlling for informant personal and household socioeconomic attributes. Perceiving giraffe, gazelles and eland as beautiful is the strongest variable explaining support for rescuing them. Ugliness is the strongest variable influencing support for the removal of buffalo, hyena, and elephant (but not lion). Both our qualitative and quantitative results suggest that perceptions of ugly species could become more positive through direct exposure to those species. We propose that protected areas in developing countries facilitate visitation by local residents to increase their familiarity with species they rarely see or most frequently see in conflict with human interests. Since valuing a species for its beauty requires seeing it, protected areas in developing countries should connect the people who live around them with the animals they protect. Our results also show that aesthetic appreciation of biodiversity is not restricted to the industrialized world.</p></div

Joana Roque de Pinho (523369)

Clara Grilo (137312)

Randall B. Boone (523370)

Kathleen A. Galvin (523371)

Jeffrey G. Snodgrass (523372)

The Francis Crick Institute

Aarde RJ (2010) Species inequality in scientific study.

Aesthetics, expertise and ethnicity: Okiek and Maasai perspectives on personal ornament.

Africa’s ivory-driven elephant slaughter continues – a family falls. The New York Times. Available: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/ 2012/11/11/africas-ivory-driven-elephant-slaughter-continues-a-family-falls/. Accessed:

Amboseli National Park: enlisting landowners to conserve migratory wildlife.

Amboseli’s people & wildlife: innocent bystanders falling prey to local conflicts.

Animal preferences and acceptability of wildlife management actions around Serengeti National Park,

Are conservation-development projects (ICDPs) sustainable? On the conservation of large mammals in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!&quot; How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection.

Beauty and the beast: preferences for animals in Australia.

Beyond ritual and economics: Maasai lion hunting and conservation politics.

Cattle colors in pastoral herds: natural selection or social preference?

Comparative changes in density and demography of large herbivores in the Masai Mara Reserve and its surrounding human-dominated pastoral ranches in Kenya.

Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Bugondo Forest Reserve,

Conservation on community lands: the importance of equitable revenue sharing.

Conservation outside parks: attitudes of local people in

Content analysis of newspaper coverage of the Florida panther.

Core Team

Creating coexistence between humans and wildlife: global perspectives on local efforst to address human-wildlife conflict.

Cultural values: a forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa.

Development interventions, changing livelihoods, and the making of female Maasai pastoralists.

Ecosystem conservation and rural development: the case of A

editors (2011) The Amboseli elephants. Chicago and London:

Elephants killed by Maasai in row with wildlife services.

Environmental aspects of settlement site decisions among pastoral Maasai.

Fanc ˇovic ˇova ´ J

glmmML: generalized linear models with clustering. R package version 0.82–1. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/ package=glmmML.

Human responses to live snakes and their photographs: evaluation of beauty and fear of the king snakes.

Influence of a field trip on the attitudes of schoolchildren toward unpopular organisms: an experience with snakes.

IUCN red list of threatened species.

Land use changes and human-wildlife conflicts in the Amboseli area,

Less is more: the potential of qualitative approaches in conservation research.

Lines around fragments: effects of fencing on large herbivores.

Linkages between changes in land use, biodiversity and land degradation in the Loitokitok area of Kenya.

Linking local perceptions of elephants and conservation: Samburu pastoralists in northern Kenya.

Lioness killed inside Amboseli Park. Lion Guardians - a participatory approach to lion conservation in East Africa Available: http:// lionguardianswildlifedirectorg/2012/08/22/lioness-killed-inside-amboselipark/Accessed: 22

Lions and warriors: social factors underlying declining African lion populations and the effect of incentivebased management in Kenya.

Lis ˇkova ´S ,B u ¨ltmann S, Burda H

Living with problem animals–selfreported fear of potentially dangerous species in the Serengeti region,

lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375–42.

Maasai language and culture dictionary. Limuru: Diocese of Meru -

Maintaining complex relations with large cats: Maasai and lions in Kenya and Tanzania.

Management by totemization: whale symbolism and the antiwhaling campaign.

Mares ˇova ´J ,R ˇeha ´kova ´-Petru ˚

Marvels of everyday vision’’: the anthropology of aesthetics and the cattle-keeping Nilotes. In:

Material culture of Kenya.

Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R.

Model selection and multimodel inference -a practical information-theoretic approach.

Navigating environmental attitudes.

ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.1–3.

Noah’s Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: The case of boid snakes in zoos.

Pastoralists and wildlife: image and reality in Kenya Maasailand. In:

Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation.

Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public.

Physical attractiveness of an animal species as a decision factor for its preservation.

Practical work at school reduces disgust and fear of unpopular animals.

Processes of fragmentation in the Amboseli ecosystem, southern Kajiado District,

Protected areas and community incentives in savannah ecosystems: a case study of Tanzania’s Maasai Steppe.

Ranking the benefits of biodiversity: an exploration of relative values

Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict.

Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Third edition: Altamira Press.

Risk and opportunity for humans coexisting with large carnivores.

S ˇimkova ´O ,L i s ˇkova ´

Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species.

Staying together’’: people-wildlife relationships in a pastoralist society in transition, Amboseli Ecosystem,

Systematic data collection.

The impact of subdivision and sedentarization of pastoral lands on wildlife in an African savanna ecosystem.

The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve,

The names of Ankole cows.

The neoteny barrier: seeking respect for the non-cute.

The persuasive effects of emotive visual imagery: superficial manipulation or the product of passionate reason?

The power of trust: toward a theory of local opposition to neighboring protected areas.

The relationship between popularity and size in zoo animals.

The relative importance of large mammal species for tourism in

The status of the Amboseli rhino population.

There’s no such beast: cattle and colour naming among the Mursi.

Things we like: human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation.

Tracking wildebeest, locating knowledge: Maasai and conservation biology understandings of wildebeest behavior in Northern Tanzania. Environment and Planning D:

Ugly animals need saving from extinction, too! Cute giant panda is hogging the conservation limelight, say campaigners. The Daily Mail.

Uiterkamp A

We want our children to grow up to see these animals:’’ values and protected areas governance in Canada, Ghana and Tanzania.

What determines bird beauty in human eyes?

What makes some species of milk snakes more attractive to humans than others? Theory in Biosciences 128:

Wildlife Connection: bridging the gap between people and wildlife - park visitation program.

https://figshare.com/articles/_Influence_of_Aesthetic_Appreciation_of_Wildlife_Species_on_Attitudes_towards_Their_Conservation_in_Kenyan_Agropastoralist_Communities_/936035

La evolución de la legislación sobre menores de edad delincuentes en la dictadura militar brasileña

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales de América Latina y El Caribe

Digital.CSIC

Crossref

Directory of Open Access Journals

The Francis Crick Institute