CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Airborne multi-spectral imagery for mapping cruciferous weeds in cereal and legume crops
Authors
Ana Isabel de Castro
Montserrat Jurado-Expósito
Francisca López Granados
José Manuel Peña Barragán
Publication date
17 October 2013
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Cruciferous weeds are competitive broad-leaved species that cause losses in winter crops. In the present study, research on remote sensing was conducted on seven naturally infested fields located in Córdoba and Seville, southern Spain. Multi-spectral aerial images (four bands, including blue (B), green (G), red (R) and near-infrared bands) taken in April 2007 were used to evaluate the feasibility of mapping cruciferous patches (Diplotaxis spp. and Sinapis spp.) in winter crops (wheat, broad bean and pea) and compare the accuracy of different supervised classification methods (vegetation indices, maximum likelihood and spectral angle mapper). The best classification method was selected to develop site-specific cruciferous treatment maps. Cruciferous patches were efficiently discriminated with red/blue (R/B) and blue/green (B/G) vegetation indices and the maximum likelihood classifier. At all of the locations, the accuracy of the results obtained from the spectral angler mapper was relatively low. The cruciferous weed-classified imagery of each location were created according to the method that provided the best discrimination results and were used to obtain site-specific treatment maps for in-season post-emergence control measures or herbicide applications for subsequent years. By applying the site-specific treatment maps, herbicide savings from 71.7 to 95.4% for the no-treatment areas and from 4.3 to 12% for the low-dose herbicide were obtained. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.This research was partially funded by the Spanish Minister of Science and Innovation by project AGL-2008-04670-CO3-03 (partially funded by FEDER)Peer Reviewe
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Digital.CSIC
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/8438...
Last time updated on 25/05/2016