Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Abstract
Among the fundamental difference the Curriculum 2013 and the previous curriculum
were in terms of learning and assessment. The learning of curriculum 2013 had oriented to
the student‘s competence development as a whole person, includes of attitudes, knowledge,
and skills aspects as an integrated manner. While the previous curriculum learning orientation
was partially in accordance to the the subjects or competencies characteristics to be achieved.
As a consequence, teachers have to really prepared and competent to be able to implementing
the curriculum. On the other hand, every turned of the curriculum always will have been the
turbulence, both regard to the lack of socialization, teacher‘s unpreparedness and other
resources, as well as the attitude of the curriculum rejecting itself. Therefore, the problem
concerning the teacher‘s readiness to the curriculum 2013 implementation, particularly in the
learning assessment in accordance to the curriculum 2013 is an urgent issue to be studied.
The result of study illustrates that the teacher‘s readiness to the curriculum implementing in
accordance to the learning assessment can be divided into two aspects, namely: assessment
planning, and assessment implementation. The results of the study by Amat Jaedun et al.
(2014), pointed out the teachers readiness to implementing instructional assessment on
planning, have been assessed using the availability and completeness of the learning
assessment aids in the poor prepared category. Meanwhile, the teacher‘s readiness to
implementing instructional assessment on implementation aspects have been assessed by the
relevance of the learning assessment to the competency characteristics to be assessed,
especially in vocational subjects matters, were also in the less ready condition. This suggests
that the teacher‘s readiness to learning assessment implementing accordance to the
curriculum 2013 both in the planning and implementation aspects were in the poor prepared
category