Types Of Administrative Dispute

Abstract

Upravni spor zbog svoje se uloge u zaštiti objektivne zakonitosti i subjektivnih prava građana stalno nalazi u središtu interesa pravne teorije. Kao posljedica širokog teorijskog razmatranja, naročito u Francuskoj, Njemačkoj i Austriji, ustalile su se određene vrste upravnih sporova oblikovane prema određenim kriterijima. Posebna je pažnja posvećena vrstama upravnih sporova u hrvatskom pravu. U hrvatskoj se teoriji upravni sporovi dijele na spor o zakonitosti i spor pune jurisdikcije, objektivni i subjektivni te prvotni i naknadni spor. Za razliku od starog ZUS-a koji je favorizirao spor o zakonitosti, novi ZUS, koji će se početi primjenjivati s početkom 2012., favorizira spor pune jurisdikcije.Due to its role in the protection of objective legality and subjective citizens’ rights, administrative dispute is constantly in the limelight of legal theory. As a consequence of a wide theoretical study, particularly in France, Germany and Austria, different types of administrative disputes have been established, according to defined criteria. The paper gives special attention to the types of administrative dispute in the Croatian law. Croatian theory divides administrative dispute into the following types: dispute of legality and dispute of full jurisdiction, objective dispute, subjective dispute, primary dispute, and subsequent dispute. Unlike the previous Administrative Dispute Act that preferred the dispute of legality, the new Act, which will be in force from the beginning of 2012, prefers the dispute of full jurisdiction