ADAPTIVE AND MALADAPTIVE MECHANISMS FOR COPING WITH STRESS AMONG POLICE OFFICERS

Abstract

Cilj istraživanja bio je ispitati učinkovitost načina suočavanja kod policijskih službenika s obzirom na dvije vrste stresora, policijski i ispitni, uz anksioznost i razinu stresa kao kriterije adaptivnosti. Kao adaptivni načini suočavanja s policijskim stresom pokazali su se: plansko rješavanje problema, distanciranje, samokontrola i suočavanje konfrontacijom. Maladaptivnim su se pokazali: traženje socijalne podrške, izbjegavanje, pozitivna ponovna procjena i prihvaćanje odgovornosti. Dakle, razine anksioznosti i stresa značajno su bile veće kod dijela ispitanika koji se koriste maladaptivnim mehanizmima. U kontekstu ispitnog stresa adaptivnim načinima suočavanja pokazali su se: plansko rješavanje problema, suočavanje konfrontacijom, pozitivna ponovna procjena i prihvaćanje odgovornosti. Maladaptivni su bili: distanciranje, traženje socijalne podrške, bijeg, izbjegavanje i samokontrola. Kao i kod policijskog stresa, razina anksioznosti značajno je bila veća kod ispitanika koji su se koristili maladaptivnim mehanizmima.The aim of this study was to examine the efficiency of the mechanisms utilized by police officers to cope with police and exam stress, with anxiety and stress levels as efficiency criteria. Planful problem solving, distancing, self-controlling and confrontive coping proved to be the common adaptive strategies in coping with police stress, while seeking social support, escape-avoidance, positive reappraisal and accepting responsibility proved to be maladaptive. As a consequence, anxiety and stress levels were found to be significantly higher among participants who used maladaptive mechanisms. With regard to exam stress, adaptive mechanisms were: planful problem solving, confrontive coping, positive reappraisal and accepting responsibility, while maladaptive mechanisms included: distancing, seeking social support, escape-avoidance coping and self-controlling. As with police stress, anxiety level was significantly higher among participants who used maladaptive mechanisms

    Similar works