Department for Croatian studies, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Rijeka
Abstract
U ovome se radu nastoji na osnovi francuskih srednjovjekovnih privatnopravnih
dokumenata pokazati što sve stoji iza termina ime. Koje pojmove i koncepte taj termin
pokriva i je li istinita činjenica da je ime isključivo indikativni, tj. demonstrativni
mehanizam. Naime, temeljni korpus za dijakronijsko proučavanje nastanka i razvoja
načina identifikacije osoba u europskome kulturološkom krugu zapravo su arhivski
dokumenti srednjovjekovnih kancelarija. U imenu se, zapisanom u arhivskim dokumentima,
miješaju ekstenzija i intenzija imenske formule, a pri analizi toga korpusa
najčešće se, ili uglavnom, ne vodi računa o tome jesu li i u kolikoj mjeri sustavi identifikacije
imenom u srednjemu vijeku, dakako prije ustaljivanja imenske formule, kompatibilni s
današnjim sustavom. Ovdje se trudimo pokazati u kolikoj mjeri srednjovjekovni zapis
kojim se identificira osoba odgovara današnjemu shvaćanju te koji su elementi
identifikacije bili presudni u formiranju suvremene imenske formule.The aim of this paper is to attempt to show what lies behind the term name on the basis of
Medieval French legal documents. We will try to show which notions and concepts this term
covers and try to see whether the claim that name is purely an indicative, that is, demonstrative,
mechanism is true. The basic corpus for the diachronic study of the origin and the development
of the ways of identifying persons in the European cultural circle consists of archival medieval
documents. In the names recorded in archival documents the extension and intension of the
naming formula are mixed, and most analyses of such corpora do not take into account whether
the systems of identification by name from the Medieval period, prior to the stabilization of the
formulae used for naming, are (and if yes, to what extent) compatible with the present day
system. In this paper, we try to show to what extent a medieval record identifying a person
matches contemporary understanding of such records and which elements were crucial for the
development of contemporary formulae used for naming