The combination of RIMS and ion sputtering has been heralded as the ideal means of quantitatively probing the surface of a solid. While several laboratories have demonstrated the extreme sensitivity of combining RIMS with sputtering, less effort has been devoted to the question of accuracy. Using the SARISA instrument developed at Argonne National Laboratory, a number of well-characterized metallic

samples have been analyzed. Results from these  determinations have been compared with data obtained by several other analytical methods. One significant finding is that impurity measurements down to ppb levels in metal matrices can be made quantitative by employing polycrystalline metal foils as calibration standards. This discovery substantially reduces the effort required for quantitative analysis since a single standard can be used for determining concentrations spanning nine orders of magnitude

Burnett, D. S.

Calaway, W. F.

Coon, S. R.

Grasserbauer, M.

Gruen, D. M.

Pellin, M. J.

Penka, V.

Stingeder, G.

Whitten, J. E.

Wiens, R. C.

Young, C. E.

The combination of RIMS and ion sputtering has been heralded as the ideal means of quantitatively probing the surface of a solid. While several laboratories have demonstrated the extreme sensitivity of combining RIMS with sputtering, less effort has been devoted to the question of accuracy. Using the SARISA instrument developed at Argonne National Laboratory, a number of well-characterized metallic samples have been analyzed. Results from these determinations have been compared with data obtained by several other analytical methods. One significant finding is that impurity measurements down to ppb levels in metal matrices can be made quantitative by employing polycrystalline metal foils as calibration standards. This discovery substantially reduces the effort required for quantitative analysis since a single standard can be used for determining concentrations spanning nine orders of magnitude

UNT Digital Library

Resonance ionization of sputtered atoms: Progress toward a quantitative technique

Caltech Authors - Main

Resonance ionization of sputtered atoms-progress toward a quantitative technique

AN/a'Q-IM/CP--75550
DE93 006798
Resonance Ionization of Sputtered Atoms -
Progress Toward a Quantitative Technique*
W. F. Calaway, 1 S.R. Coon,l, 2 M.J. Pellin,1 C.E. Young, 1
J. E. Whitten, 1 R. C. Wiens, 3 D. M. Gruen, 1 G. Stingeder, 4
V. Penka, 5 M. Grasserbauer, 4 and D. S. Burnett3
! Materials Science/Chemical Technology/Chemistry Divisions,
Argonne National Laboratory.
2 Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin.
3 Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences,
California Institute of Technology.
4 Institute of Analytical Chemistry,
. Technical University of Vienna
"_'_ _._'_ _ _ 5 Siemens AG, Munich
__ _-
°'"
=_.-oe.=._a_.=_e_r_-.°-,, _ To be presented at the
,, eo_ _ Sixth International Symposium on
" i
!"°i_ _ ._ Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy.,] _,, _ _" and Its Applications (RIS-92),
_ _}_' _=i_ May 24-29, 1992 -,,,,-IV_D
_ __ ]..__ _ SantaFe, NM FEB- 3 1993OSTI
I_'_ _ _I _ IThe submitted manuscript has been authored by[
z _ e _ _ l" _o_,_,,_o_f ,hou. s. Oo_=moo,,_d_I
. _ O " _ _ _ contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38. Accordingly, the[
"_ 0 *" U.S. Government retains a nouexclusive, royalty- [
= _ g :_ _ free license to publish or reproduce th,q
_ _ _"_ published form of this contribution, or allow[
_8-.,,_o u _ _ __ " = _ "_ others to ao so, for U. S. Government purl_ses. ,,,,i
*Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES-Materials
Sciences, under Contract W-31-109-ENG-38.
1 ID_BUTION OF THIS DOOUMENT IS UNLIMITED
• *t
Resonance Ionization of Sputtered Atoms - Progress Toward a Quantitative
Technique*
W. F. Calaway, 1 S. R. Coon. 1,2M. J. Pellin, 1 C. E. Young, 1J. E. Whitten, 1 R. C. Wiens, 3
D. M. Gruen, x G. Stingeder, `_V. Penka,5 M. Grasserbauer, _ and D. S. Burnett 3
ABSTRACT: The combination of RIMS and ion sputtering has been heralded as the
ideal means of quantitatively probing the surface of a solid. While several laboratories
have demonstrated the extreme sensitivity of combining RIMS with sputtering, less
effort has been devoted to the question of accuracy. Using the SARISA instrument
developed at Argonne National Laboratory, a number of well-characterized metallic
samples have been analyzed. Results from these determinations have been compared
with data obtained by several other analytical methods. One significant finding is that
impurity measurements down to ppb levels in metal matrices can be made quantitative by
employing polycrystalline metal foils as calibration standards. This discovery
substantially reduces the effort required for quantitative analysis since a single standard
can be used for determining concentrations spanning nine orders of magnitude.
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the demonstration that atomic selectivities of 1019 could be achieved by resonance
ionization spectroscopy (Hurst, 1977), the field has rapidly grown as researchers have
attempted to exploit this unique capability. One arena where these endeavors have been
particularly fruitful is surface analysis where resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS),
in combination with ion sputtering, has been employed to analyze for trace impurities on the
surfaces and in the bulk of a solid by probing the material ejected into the gas phase during ion
bombardment. Here, the selectivity of resonance ionization is used to separate the element of
interest from the bulk material that is sputtered and a mass spectrometer is used for noise
discrimination and detection. At least three different laboratories have reported detection
capabilities below atom fractions of 10.9 (1 appb) employing this technique (Young, 1986;
Pappas, 1989; Thonnard, 1989; Pellin, 1990).
In addition to selectivity, RIMS of sputtered atoms has the potential for making quantitative
measurements with ease. This is derived from the fact that sputtering of clean metals by noble
gas ions produces a flux dominated by ground state neutral atoms and the fact that there is a
large data base on the rate of removal for most metals due to sputtering. By knowing
sputtering rates and instrument transmissions, it is possible to draw quantitative conclusions
*Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES-Materials Sciences, under Contract
W-31-109-ENG-38.
1Materials Science/Chemical Technology/Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory.
2Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin.
3Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology.
4institute of Analytical Chemistry, Technical University of Vienna
5Siemens AG, Munich
I
regarding impurity concentrations if the degree of ionization is known. Thus, RIS is unique
in that complete ionization of a species is possible without extraordinary efforts.
One of the difficulties associated with quantitative analysis is the development of standards.
This is particularly true for techniques that are attempting to extend detection limits to
heretofore unobtainable levels. To better define the usefulness of surface analysis by
resonance ionization of sputtered atoms (SARISA) for quantitative analysis, a series of
samples has been analyzed for various impurities at levels that can be confirmed by other
techniques. The experiments that have been completed to date are presented herein.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
RIMS experiments have been performed to determine the concentration of Fe, Cu, and Mo in
Si. Pure Si wafers were dipped into solutions containing Cr, Cu, Ni, and Fe in order to
produce contaminated samples. These samples were then analyzed by total reflection x-ray
fluorescence (TXRF). Each wafer was then split in half, one half being analyzed by
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and the other half by SARISA. In addition, two
targets were prepared by ion implanting 200 kev Mo into Si wafers at doses of 3.0 x 1013/cm2
and 1.0 x 10rl/cm 2
The TXRF that was used was an Atomika model XSA 8000 located at Siemens, Munich,
Germany. The SIMS instrument was the CAMECA IMS 3f located at the Technical
University, Vienna, Austria. SARISA is a one-of-a-kind laser postionization secondary
neutral mass spectrometer built and operated by Argonne National Laboratory, USA. Both
the TXRF and SIMS are commercially available instruments and require no further
description. Details of SARISA can be found in past publications (Pellin, 1988; Pellin 1987).
For Cu and Mo in Si, simple two-color/two-photon ionization schemes produce good
discrimination between signal and background. In the SARISA analyses, the Cu resonance
transition at 327.40 nm (zS1/2 -_ 2p3/2) was utilized. ,;_,dye laser containing DMT and
pumped with a KrF excimer laser was employed for the resonance step and a XeC1 excimer
laser (308 nm) was used to access the ionization continuum. For Mo RIMS, the z7P0 state is
accessed from the ground state (a7S3) by a dye laser tuned to 386.41 nm and then ionized with
light from a XeC1 excimer laser. For Fe in Si, a three-color/three-photon scheme was
employed in order to minimize isobaric interference from nonresonantly ionized Si dimers
(Gruen, 1991). This ionization schemt_ re.quires three dye lasers tuned to 344.06, 640.00,
and 510.0 nm in order to access the zSP3, eSD4 and an autoionizing state of Fe, respectively,
in a stepwise fashion.
In order to make quantitative determinations, the SARISA instrument was calibrated before
and after analysis of the unknown sample. This was accomplished by determining the
transmission of the instrument by measuring the signal from a pure metal foil of the element
being investigated. For a constant ion current and instrument transmission, this signal, S,
from the pure, p, elemental target is then used to calculate the concentration of that element,
[M], in an unknown sample, u, through the equation,
SuYpGp
[M] - SpYuau (1)
where Y is the sputtering yield and G is the gain of the detector.
regarding impurity concentrations if the degree of ionization is known. Thus, RIS is unique
in that complete ioaization of a species is possible without extraordinary efforts.
One of the difficulties associated with quantitative analysis is the development of standards.
This is particularly true for techniques that are attempting to extend detection limits to
heretofore unobtainable levels. To better define the usefulness of surface analysis by
resonance ionization of sputtered atoms (SARISA) for quantitative analysis, a series of
samples has been analyzed for various impurities at levels that can be confirmed by other
techniques. The experiments that have been completed to date are presented herein.
2. EXPERIMENT AL
RIMS experiments have been performed to determine the concentration of Fe, Cu, and Mo in
Si. Pure Si wafers were dipped into solutions containing Cr, Cu, Ni, and Fe in order to
produce contaminated samples. These samples were then analyzed by total reflection x-ray
fluorescence (TXRF). Each wafer was then split in half, one half being analyzed by
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and the other half by SARISA. In addition, two
targets were orepared by ion implanting 200 keV Mo into Si wafers at doses of 3.0 x 1013/cm2
and 1.0 x 10rl/cm 2
The TXRF that was used was an Atomika model XSA 8000 located at Siemens, Munich,
Germany. The SIMS instrument was the CAMECA IMS 3f located at the Technical
University, Vienna, Austria. SARISA is a one-of-a-kind laser postionization secondary
neutral mass spectrometer built and operated by Argonne National Laboratory, USA. Both
the TXRF and SIMS are commercially available instruments and require no further
description. Details of SARISA can be found in past publications (Pellin, 1988; Pellin 1987).
For Cu and Mo in Si, simple two-color/two-photon ionization schemes produce good
discrimination between signal and background. In the SARISA analyses, the Cu resonance
transition at 327.40 nm ('_S1/2-'- 2p3/2) was utilized. A dye laser containing DMT and
pumped with a KrF excimer laser was employed for the resonance step and a XeCI excimer
laser (308 nra) was used to access the ionization continuum. For Mo RIMS, the z7P0 state is
accessed from the ground state (a7S3) by a dye laser tuned to 386.41 mn and then ionized with
light from a XeC1 excimer laser. For Fe in Si, a three-color/three.photon scheme was
employed in order to minimize isobaric interference from non.resonantly ionized Si dimers
(Gruen, 1991). This ionization scheme requires three dye lasers tuned to 344.06, 640.00,
and 510.0 nm in order to access the zSP_, eSD4 and an autoionizing state of Fe, respectively,
in a stepwise fashion.
In order to make quantitative determinations, the SARISA instrument was calibrated before
and after analysis of the unknown sample. This was accomplished by determining the
transmission of the instrument by measuring the signal from a pure metal foil of the element
being investigated. For a constant ion current and instrument transmission, this signal, S,
from the pure, p, elemental target is then used to calculate the concentration of that element,
lM], in an unknown sample, u, through the equation,
[MI = SuYpGp
SpYuGu (1)
where Y is the sp ,,_'c_ingyield and G is the gain of the detector.
• • Q
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Both SIMS and SARISA have the capability to determine elemental concentrativ,s as a
function of depth. This is accomplished by monitoring signal for the element of interest as an
ion beam mills into the target. Typical results for the SARISA instrument are shown in
Figures 1 and 2 for Cu and Mo, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 1, the Cu is clearly a
surface contaminate that falls off with depth. This is in contrast to the Mo sample shown in
Figure 2. Here, the Mo depth profile shows the typical shape expected for an ion-implanted
target. The peak at 200 nm in Figure 2 is in agreement with that depth for 200 keV Mo
implanted into Si.
I 0 0 . _'..... , ....... _ ....... _ ........ , ........ 1 0 2 ......... , ........ , ......... I ...........
8O
1 01
_" 60 EeZ,
Ca. _, 0°Area under curve _ 1
cm 2 '_'
= 40
•_" "" 5 x 1013/cm2
10"1
2O
56+3 ppb
0 ........ ' ' ".... " ........... _ .... 1 0" 2 ........ I ........ i ........ i .......
10 -2 10 "1 10 ° 101 10 2 10 s 10 ° 101 10 2 10 3 10 4
Depth (nm) Depth(nm)
Fig. 1 SARISA analysis showing the Fig. 2 SARISA analysis showing the
Cu in Si concentration as a function of Mo in Si concentration as a function of
depth. Integration of the data from 0 to depth. Integration of the entire curve
15 nm yields a total Cu content of yields a total Mo content of
0.7 x 1012/cm2. 5.0 x 1013/cm2.
TXRF instruments are unable to produce concentration versus depth data but rather measure
the total concentration of contaminants in the near-surface region. For Si targets, this
corresponds to about 15 nm. Thus, TXRF is capable of measuring surface contamination
such as shown is Figure 1 but is unable to determine the concentration of implanted species as
shown in Figure 2. In order to compare the SARISA measurements with TXRF data,
concentration versus depth data must be integrated over the depth of TXRF sensitivity.
Similarly, depth profile data of ion implanted standards must be integrated over the entire
concentration peak in order to compare the SARISA measured results with the known ion
dose. Integrations of SARISA depth profiles have been performed and are listed in Table I
along with results from TXRF measurements and from implanted targets of known ion doses.
Also listed in Table I are results of the SIMS analyses. Since SIMS data is difficult to
quantify, results from these analyses are expressed only as to whether or not real signal above
interferences could be observed.
As can be seen in Table I, agreement is reasonably good when various types of instruments
are used to analyze the same sample. To date, only Cu analyses have been performed on
identical Si samples by SARISA, SIMS, and TXRF. Unfortunately, the SIMS analysis
suffered from an isobaric interference that, when supressed, reduced the sensitivity of the
measurement to the point that no Cu could be detected. Only SIMS analyses of Fe and Cr had
confirmed signal above levels of isobaric interferences, but the SARISA analyses for these
samples are yet to be performed. The agreement between the TXRF and SARISA
measurments indicate that either may be used to measure surface contaminations. However,
TXRF is unable to furnish the concentration versus depth information that SARISA can
produce. In addition, SARISA has been shown to have a detection limit below 1 ppb while
maintaining near monolayer resolution (Pellin, 1990).
Table I. Comparison of impurity concentrations in Si as determined by various
analytical methods. All concentrations are given in atoms/cm 2. For SIMS
analysis, yes and no indicate whether an element was detected.
Element SARISA TXRF SIMS Ion Implant
Mo 5.0 x 1013 - 3.0 x 1013
m ,,, ,
Mo 2.5 x 1011 - 1.0 x 1011
Fe 4.0 x 1012 8.0 x 1012 - -
Fe 0.6 x 1012 yes -
Cu 0.8 x 1012 1.3 x 1012 no -
Cu 0.3 x 1012 no -
, ,
Cr - 0.3 x 1012 yes -
Ni 1.1 x 1012 no -
A point regarding the accuracy of the SARISA measurements that should be emphasized is the
method of calibration as described in the experimental section. Simple metallic foils were
used as standards for these measurements, yet the accuracy appears to be good to within a
factor of 3. As shown here for Si and observed in our laboratory for other metals, Equation 1
is valid down to at least ppb levels for metallic targets. The only other information required to
make quantitative determinations in this manner is knowledge of the sputtering yields for the
metal and the unknown substrate, and knowledge of the detector gain curve. Thus, it is
possible to perform trace analyses with SARISA without the laborious task of developing and
fabricating calibration standards specific to the substrate of interest.
4. REFERENCES
Gruen D M, Calaway W F, Pellin M J, Young C E, Spiegel D R, Clayton R N, Davis A M
and Blum J D 1991 Nucl Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 58 505
Hurst G S, Nayfeh M H and Judish J P 1977 Appl. Phys. Lett. 30 229
Pappas D L, Hrubowchak D M, Ervin M H and Winograd N 1989 Science 243 64
Pellin M J, Young C E, Calaway W F, Burnett J W, JCrgensen B, Schweitzer E L and
Gruen D M 1987 Nucl Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 18 446
Pellin M J, Young C E and Gruen D M 1988 Scanning Microsc. 2 1353
Pellin M J, Young C E, Calaway W F, Whitten J E, Gruen D M, Blum J D, Hutcheon I D
and Wasserburg G J 1990 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 333 133
Thonnard N, Parks J E, Willis R D, Moore L J and Arlinghaus H F 1989 Surf. and Interface
Anal. 14 751
Young C E, Pellin M J, Calaway W F, J¢rgensen B, Schweitzer E L and Gruen D M 1986
Inst. Phys. Con£ Ser. 84 163

!
-il


AN/a'Q-IM/CP--75550
DE93 006798
Resonance Ionization of Sputtered Atoms -
Progress Toward a Quantitative Technique*
W. F. Calaway, 1 S.R. Coon,l, 2 M.J. Pellin,1 C.E. Young, 1
J. E. Whitten, 1 R. C. Wiens, 3 D. M. Gruen, 1 G. Stingeder, 4
V. Penka, 5 M. Grasserbauer, 4 and D. S. Burnett3
! Materials Science/Chemical Technology/Chemistry Divisions,
Argonne National Laboratory.
2 Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin.
3 Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences,
California Institute of Technology.
4 Institute of Analytical Chemistry,
. Technical University of Vienna
"_'_ _._'_ _ _ 5 Siemens AG, Munich
__ _-
°'"
=_.-oe.=._a_.=_e_r_-.°-,, _ To be presented at the
,, eo_ _ Sixth International Symposium on
" i
!"°i
_ _ ._ Resonance Ionization Spectroscopy
.,] _,, _ _" and Its Applications (RIS-92),
_ _}_' _=i_ May 24-29, 1992 -,,,,-IV_D
_ __ ]..__ _ SantaFe, NM FEB- 3 1993
OSTI
I_'_ _ _I _ IThe submitted manuscript has been authored by[
z _ e _ _ l" _o_,_,,_o_f ,hou. s. Oo_=moo,,_d_I
. _ O " _ _ _ contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38. Accordingly, the[
"_ 0 *" U.S. Government retains a nouexclusive, royalty- [
= _ g :_ _ free license to publish or reproduce th,q
_ _ _"_ published form of this contribution, or allow[
_8-.,,_o u _ _ __ " = _ "_ others to ao so, for U. S. Government purl_ses. ,,,,i
*Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES-Materials
Sciences, under Contract W-31-109-ENG-38.
1 ID_BUTION OF THIS DOOUMENT IS UNLIMITED
• *t
Resonance Ionization of Sputtered Atoms - Progress Toward a Quantitative
Technique*
W. F. Calaway, 1 S. R. Coon. 1,2M. J. Pellin, 1 C. E. Young, 1J. E. Whitten, 1 R. C. Wiens, 3
D. M. Gruen, x G. Stingeder, `_V. Penka,5 M. Grasserbauer, _ and D. S. Burnett 3
ABSTRACT: The combination of RIMS and ion sputtering has been heralded as the
ideal means of quantitatively probing the surface of a solid. While several laboratories
have demonstrated the extreme sensitivity of combining RIMS with sputtering, less
effort has been devoted to the question of accuracy. Using the SARISA instrument
developed at Argonne National Laboratory, a number of well-characterized metallic
samples have been analyzed. Results from these determinations have been compared
with data obtained by several other analytical methods. One significant finding is that
impurity measurements down to ppb levels in metal matrices can be made quantitative by
employing polycrystalline metal foils as calibration standards. This discovery
substantially reduces the effort required for quantitative analysis since a single standard
can be used for determining concentrations spanning nine orders of magnitude.
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the demonstration that atomic selectivities of 1019 could be achieved by resonance
ionization spectroscopy (Hurst, 1977), the field has rapidly grown as researchers have
attempted to exploit this unique capability. One arena where these endeavors have been
particularly fruitful is surface analysis where resonance ionization mass spectrometry (RIMS),
in combination with ion sputtering, has been employed to analyze for trace impurities on the
surfaces and in the bulk of a solid by probing the material ejected into the gas phase during ion
bombardment. Here, the selectivity of resonance ionization is used to separate the element of
interest from the bulk material that is sputtered and a mass spectrometer is used for noise
discrimination and detection. At least three different laboratories have reported detection
capabilities below atom fractions of 10.9 (1 appb) employing this technique (Young, 1986;
Pappas, 1989; Thonnard, 1989; Pellin, 1990).
In addition to selectivity, RIMS of sputtered atoms has the potential for making quantitative
measurements with ease. This is derived from the fact that sputtering of clean metals by noble
gas ions produces a flux dominated by ground state neutral atoms and the fact that there is a
large data base on the rate of removal for most metals due to sputtering. By knowing
sputtering rates and instrument transmissions, it is possible to draw quantitative conclusions
*Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, BES-Materials Sciences, under Contract
W-31-109-ENG-38.
1Materials Science/Chemical Technology/Chemistry Divisions, Argonne National Laboratory.
2Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin.
3Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology.
4institute of Analytical Chemistry, Technical University of Vienna
5Siemens AG, Munich
I
regarding impurity concentrations if the degree of ionization is known. Thus, RIS is unique
in that complete ionization of a species is possible without extraordinary efforts.
One of the difficulties associated with quantitative analysis is the development of standards.
This is particularly true for techniques that are attempting to extend detection limits to
heretofore unobtainable levels. To better define the usefulness of surface analysis by
resonance ionization of sputtered atoms (SARISA) for quantitative analysis, a series of
samples has been analyzed for various impurities at levels that can be confirmed by other
techniques. The experiments that have been completed to date are presented herein.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
RIMS experiments have been performed to determine the concentration of Fe, Cu, and Mo in
Si. Pure Si wafers were dipped into solutions containing Cr, Cu, Ni, and Fe in order to
produce contaminated samples. These samples were then analyzed by total reflection x-ray
fluorescence (TXRF). Each wafer was then split in half, one half being analyzed by
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and the other half by SARISA. In addition, two
targets were prepared by ion implanting 200 kev Mo into Si wafers at doses of 3.0 x 1013/cm2
and 1.0 x 10rl/cm 2
The TXRF that was used was an Atomika model XSA 8000 located at Siemens, Munich,
Germany. The SIMS instrument was the CAMECA IMS 3f located at the Technical
University, Vienna, Austria. SARISA is a one-of-a-kind laser postionization secondary
neutral mass spectrometer built and operated by Argonne National Laboratory, USA. Both
the TXRF and SIMS are commercially available instruments and require no further
description. Details of SARISA can be found in past publications (Pellin, 1988; Pellin 1987).
For Cu and Mo in Si, simple two-color/two-photon ionization schemes produce good
discrimination between signal and background. In the SARISA analyses, the Cu resonance
transition at 327.40 nm (zS1/2 -_ 2p3/2) was utilized. ,;_,dye laser containing DMT and
pumped with a KrF excimer laser was employed for the resonance step and a XeC1 excimer
laser (308 nm) was used to access the ionization continuum. For Mo RIMS, the z7P0 state is
accessed from the ground state (a7S3) by a dye laser tuned to 386.41 nm and then ionized with
light from a XeC1 excimer laser. For Fe in Si, a three-color/three-photon scheme was
employed in order to minimize isobaric interference from nonresonantly ionized Si dimers
(Gruen, 1991). This ionization schemt_ re.quires three dye lasers tuned to 344.06, 640.00,
and 510.0 nm in order to access the zSP3, eSD4 and an autoionizing state of Fe, respectively,
in a stepwise fashion.
In order to make quantitative determinations, the SARISA instrument was calibrated before
and after analysis of the unknown sample. This was accomplished by determining the
transmission of the instrument by measuring the signal from a pure metal foil of the element
being investigated. For a constant ion current and instrument transmission, this signal, S,
from the pure, p, elemental target is then used to calculate the concentration of that element,
[M], in an unknown sample, u, through the equation,
SuYpGp
[M] - SpYuau (1)
where Y is the sputtering yield and G is the gain of the detector.
regarding impurity concentrations if the degree of ionization is known. Thus, RIS is unique
in that complete ioaization of a species is possible without extraordinary efforts.
One of the difficulties associated with quantitative analysis is the development of standards.
This is particularly true for techniques that are attempting to extend detection limits to
heretofore unobtainable levels. To better define the usefulness of surface analysis by
resonance ionization of sputtered atoms (SARISA) for quantitative analysis, a series of
samples has been analyzed for various impurities at levels that can be confirmed by other
techniques. The experiments that have been completed to date are presented herein.
2. EXPERIMENT AL
RIMS experiments have been performed to determine the concentration of Fe, Cu, and Mo in
Si. Pure Si wafers were dipped into solutions containing Cr, Cu, Ni, and Fe in order to
produce contaminated samples. These samples were then analyzed by total reflection x-ray
fluorescence (TXRF). Each wafer was then split in half, one half being analyzed by
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and the other half by SARISA. In addition, two
targets were orepared by ion implanting 200 keV Mo into Si wafers at doses of 3.0 x 1013/cm2
and 1.0 x 10rl/cm 2
The TXRF that was used was an Atomika model XSA 8000 located at Siemens, Munich,
Germany. The SIMS instrument was the CAMECA IMS 3f located at the Technical
University, Vienna, Austria. SARISA is a one-of-a-kind laser postionization secondary
neutral mass spectrometer built and operated by Argonne National Laboratory, USA. Both
the TXRF and SIMS are commercially available instruments and require no further
description. Details of SARISA can be found in past publications (Pellin, 1988; Pellin 1987).
For Cu and Mo in Si, simple two-color/two-photon ionization schemes produce good
discrimination between signal and background. In the SARISA analyses, the Cu resonance
transition at 327.40 nm ('_S1/2-'- 2p3/2) was utilized. A dye laser containing DMT and
pumped with a KrF excimer laser was employed for the resonance step and a XeCI excimer
laser (308 nra) was used to access the ionization continuum. For Mo RIMS, the z7P0 state is
accessed from the ground state (a7S3) by a dye laser tuned to 386.41 mn and then ionized with
light from a XeC1 excimer laser. For Fe in Si, a three-color/three.photon scheme was
employed in order to minimize isobaric interference from non.resonantly ionized Si dimers
(Gruen, 1991). This ionization scheme requires three dye lasers tuned to 344.06, 640.00,
and 510.0 nm in order to access the zSP_, eSD4 and an autoionizing state of Fe, respectively,
in a stepwise fashion.
In order to make quantitative determinations, the SARISA instrument was calibrated before
and after analysis of the unknown sample. This was accomplished by determining the
transmission of the instrument by measuring the signal from a pure metal foil of the element
being investigated. For a constant ion current and instrument transmission, this signal, S,
from the pure, p, elemental target is then used to calculate the concentration of that element,
lM], in an unknown sample, u, through the equation,
[MI = SuYpGp
SpYuGu (1)
where Y is the sp ,,_'c_ingyield and G is the gain of the detector.
• • Q
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Both SIMS and SARISA have the capability to determine elemental concentrativ,s as a
function of depth. This is accomplished by monitoring signal for the element of interest as an
ion beam mills into the target. Typical results for the SARISA instrument are shown in
Figures 1 and 2 for Cu and Mo, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 1, the Cu is clearly a
surface contaminate that falls off with depth. This is in contrast to the Mo sample shown in
Figure 2. Here, the Mo depth profile shows the typical shape expected for an ion-implanted
target. The peak at 200 nm in Figure 2 is in agreement with that depth for 200 keV Mo
implanted into Si.
I 0 0 . _'..... , ....... _ ....... _ ........ , ........ 1 0 2 ......... , ........ , ......... I ...........
8O
1 01
_" 60 EeZ,
Ca. _, 0°Area under curve _ 1
cm 2 '_'
= 40
•_" "" 5 x 1013/cm2
10"1
2O
56+3 ppb
0 ........ ' ' ".... " ........... _ .... 1 0" 2 ........ I ........ i ........ i .......
10 -2 10 "1 10 ° 101 10 2 10 s 10 ° 101 10 2 10 3 10 4
Depth (nm) Depth(nm)
Fig. 1 SARISA analysis showing the Fig. 2 SARISA analysis showing the
Cu in Si concentration as a function of Mo in Si concentration as a function of
depth. Integration of the data from 0 to depth. Integration of the entire curve
15 nm yields a total Cu content of yields a total Mo content of
0.7 x 1012/cm2. 5.0 x 1013/cm2.
TXRF instruments are unable to produce concentration versus depth data but rather measure
the total concentration of contaminants in the near-surface region. For Si targets, this
corresponds to about 15 nm. Thus, TXRF is capable of measuring surface contamination
such as shown is Figure 1 but is unable to determine the concentration of implanted species as
shown in Figure 2. In order to compare the SARISA measurements with TXRF data,
concentration versus depth data must be integrated over the depth of TXRF sensitivity.
Similarly, depth profile data of ion implanted standards must be integrated over the entire
concentration peak in order to compare the SARISA measured results with the known ion
dose. Integrations of SARISA depth profiles have been performed and are listed in Table I
along with results from TXRF measurements and from implanted targets of known ion doses.
Also listed in Table I are results of the SIMS analyses. Since SIMS data is difficult to
quantify, results from these analyses are expressed only as to whether or not real signal above
interferences could be observed.
As can be seen in Table I, agreement is reasonably good when various types of instruments
are used to analyze the same sample. To date, only Cu analyses have been performed on
identical Si samples by SARISA, SIMS, and TXRF. Unfortunately, the SIMS analysis
suffered from an isobaric interference that, when supressed, reduced the sensitivity of the
measurement to the point that no Cu could be detected. Only SIMS analyses of Fe and Cr had
confirmed signal above levels of isobaric interferences, but the SARISA analyses for these
samples are yet to be performed. The agreement between the TXRF and SARISA
measurments indicate that either may be used to measure surface contaminations. However,
TXRF is unable to furnish the concentration versus depth information that SARISA can
produce. In addition, SARISA has been shown to have a detection limit below 1 ppb while
maintaining near monolayer resolution (Pellin, 1990).
Table I. Comparison of impurity concentrations in Si as determined by various
analytical methods. All concentrations are given in atoms/cm 2. For SIMS
analysis, yes and no indicate whether an element was detected.
Element SARISA TXRF SIMS Ion Implant
Mo 5.0 x 1013 - 3.0 x 1013
m ,,, ,
Mo 2.5 x 1011 - 1.0 x 1011
Fe 4.0 x 1012 8.0 x 1012 - -
Fe 0.6 x 1012 yes -
Cu 0.8 x 1012 1.3 x 1012 no -
Cu 0.3 x 1012 no -, ,
Cr - 0.3 x 1012 yes -
Ni 1.1 x 1012 no -
A point regarding the accuracy of the SARISA measurements that should be emphasized is the
method of calibration as described in the experimental section. Simple metallic foils were
used as standards for these measurements, yet the accuracy appears to be good to within a
factor of 3. As shown here for Si and observed in our laboratory for other metals, Equation 1
is valid down to at least ppb levels for metallic targets. The only other information required to
make quantitative determinations in this manner is knowledge of the sputtering yields for the
metal and the unknown substrate, and knowledge of the detector gain curve. Thus, it is
possible to perform trace analyses with SARISA without the laborious task of developing and
fabricating calibration standards specific to the substrate of interest.
4. REFERENCES
Gruen D M, Calaway W F, Pellin M J, Young C E, Spiegel D R, Clayton R N, Davis A M
and Blum J D 1991 Nucl Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 58 505
Hurst G S, Nayfeh M H and Judish J P 1977 Appl. Phys. Lett. 30 229
Pappas D L, Hrubowchak D M, Ervin M H and Winograd N 1989 Science 243 64
Pellin M J, Young C E, Calaway W F, Burnett J W, JCrgensen B, Schweitzer E L and
Gruen D M 1987 Nucl Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 18 446
Pellin M J, Young C E and Gruen D M 1988 Scanning Microsc. 2 1353
Pellin M J, Young C E, Calaway W F, Whitten J E, Gruen D M, Blum J D, Hutcheon I D
and Wasserburg G J 1990 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 333 133
Thonnard N, Parks J E, Willis R D, Moore L J and Arlinghaus H F 1989 Surf. and Interface
Anal. 14 751
Young C E, Pellin M J, Calaway W F, J¢rgensen B, Schweitzer E L and Gruen D M 1986
Inst. Phys. Con£ Ser. 84 163

!
-il


English

https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1274547/m2/1/high_res_d/10127335.pdf

Resonance ionization of sputtered atoms-progress toward a quantitative technique

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

UNT Digital Library

Caltech Authors - Main

Caltech Authors - Main

Caltech Authors - Main