Dopexamine and norepinephrine versus epinephrine on gastric perfusion in patients with septic shock: a randomized study [NCT00134212]

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Microcirculatory blood flow, and notably gut perfusion, is important in the development of multiple organ failure in septic shock. We compared the effects of dopexamine and norepinephrine (noradrenaline) with those of epinephrine (adrenaline) on gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) in patients with septic shock. The effects of these drugs on oxidative stress were also assessed. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study performed in a surgical intensive care unit among adults fulfilling usual criteria for septic shock. Systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, GMBF (laser-Doppler) and malondialdehyde were assessed just before catecholamine infusion (T(0)), as soon as mean arterial pressure (MAP) reached 70 to 80 mmHg (T(1)), and 2 hours (T(2)) and 6 hours (T(3)) after T(1). Drugs were titrated from 0.2 μg kg(-1 )min(-1 )with 0.2 μg kg(-1 )min(-1 )increments every 3 minutes for epinephrine and norepinephrine, and from 0.5 μg kg(-1 )min(-1 )with 0.5 μg kg(-1 )min(-1 )increments every 3 minutes for dopexamine. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included (10 receiving epinephrine, 12 receiving dopexamine–norepinephrine). There was no significant difference between groups on MAP at T(0), T(1), T(2), and T(3). Heart rate and cardiac output increased significantly more with epinephrine than with dopexamine–norepinephrine, whereas. GMBF increased significantly more with dopexamine–norepinephrine than with epinephrine between T(1 )and T(3 )(median values 106, 137, 133, and 165 versus 76, 91, 90, and 125 units of relative flux at T(0), T(1), T(2 )and T(3), respectively). Malondialdehyde similarly increased in both groups between T(1 )and T(3). CONCLUSION: In septic shock, at doses that induced the same effect on MAP, dopexamine–norepinephrine enhanced GMBF more than epinephrine did. No difference was observed on oxidative stress