This work explores the functional and cognitive complexities involved in written text production
in undergraduate education. The objects of analysis are texts produced in the Grammar II course
by students in the teaching, translation and research-oriented English study programs at Facultad
de Lenguas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Although the study has been carried out in a foreign
language and in a specific field, it has been based on the belief that many of the problems observed
are also present in texts produced in other disciplines and in the L1. Drawing on the theoretical
and methodological tools of the ‘Sydney School’ (Martin & Rose, 2008; Rose & Martin, 2012),
which relies on the general conceptual framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL)
(Halliday, 1985; Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014), the study analyzes the structuring of knowledge
in students’ texts and the contextual appropriateness of the organization of information in those
texts. After this empirical stage, the work shows that although the SFL theory can account for the
functional and some of the cognitive complexities involved in disciplinary written text production,
it seems not to fully explain how knowledge becomes available for the production of effective texts,
i.e. texts that respond to the demands of new contexts. Finally, it suggests a possible articulation
of this framework with a cognitive theory of knowledge development known as Representational
Redescription (RR) (Karmiloff-Smith, 1992, 2002, 2006), which explains how representations
become restructured, manipulable and available to be meaningfully used in new contexts. The
dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives is expected to provide insights that should
lead to a deeper understanding of disciplinary writing in undergraduate education and enrich
pedagogical interventions in content-oriented literacy