Arnold, Erik

Mahieu, Bea

University of Twente Research Information

                           EU-SPRI Conference 2014  Booklet of Abstract  231  Bea Mahieu1 and Erik Arnold2.  1Technopolis, UK.  2 Technopolis and Universiteit Twente  Can we support European research and innovation policymaking by federating information systems?   Abstract:  Inspired by the US ‘Star Metrics;’ project, this paper explores the relevance and feasibility of building a Europe-wide IT system to support research performance and assessment.  It is based on research undertaken in connection with a more extensive study of the opportunities developing a Europe-wide approach to measuring scientific performance, in support of policymaking2.   This involved a review of relevant academic and policy literatures, desk research and 27 expert interviews to assemble information about the practice of research performance assessments and the development of information systems in Europe. We then analysed current approaches to research performance assessment in Europe, the concepts, methods and tools used, as well as benefits and challenges in 13 European countries.  Policy drivers The post-War ‘social contract’ between science and society left the research community to a high degree free to choose what it researched. But since the 1960s/70s, research is increasingly expected to support the attainment of explicit social goals, contribute to economic development and develop solutions for major societal challenges.  These expectations are translated into how governance works, though governance is also influenced by wider trends in the way the state is managed.  Under the influence of the New Public Management, the state makes growing use of agency, with higher levels (such as ministries) setting broad objectives and establishing performance contracts with lower levels (such as agencies).   One consequence is that evaluation has become a key component of policy making. Of late, many countries have introduced performance-based funding systems for allocating ‘institutional’ funding to universities and other research performers.  These are data-hungry and are increasingly supported by country-specific research information systems.  The role of evaluation more widely, however, remains contested with both the policy-making and the research communities seeking influence over how evaluation is conducted and what questions it tries to answer. At the same time, the need for research information and ‘strategic intelligence’ has increased.  The growing availability of ICT-supported information generation and storage systems at all levels supports this growth.                                                                2 Bea Mahieu, Erik Arnold and Peter Kolarz, Measuring Scientific Performance for Improved Policymaking, STOA, European Parliament (forthcoming, 2014) EU-SPRI Conference 2014  Booklet of Abstract  232  Current trends in research performance assessment – methods and tools Policy-makers at the European and national levels already make considerable use of traditional STI indicators, notably bibliometrics, to benchmark science and innovation systems. But the inadequacy of these indicators to satisfy the current information needs for policymaking or to feed the performance based funding systems that are increasingly prevalent at national level promotes the increasing use of ad-hoc evidence collection projects, including research information systems. More systematic access to these micro-data is expected to facilitate a better understanding of the processes leading to innovation and to improve the assessment of the systemic impacts of research, in particular in the economic and social spheres. Research information systems play a significant additional role at national and especially institutional levels by enabling access to research information (publications and data) by means of open access repositories, providing important benefits to researchers. The trend is towards increasing development of national research information systems among EU member states.  In many cases, the repository function is the primary one, potentially complicating ‘dual use’ of such research information systems in both assessment and the provision of access to research information.   Our literature review pointed to a growing need for a European view of research performance and impacts, especially in the context of the globalisation of research as well as increasing links between European and national research policies. Horizon 2020 is the prime example of such increasing inter-linkage of European and national funding of research.  Sharing information across different systems is increasingly enabled by the development of relevant standards.   It appears therefore that a multi-level research information infrastructure – at the European level and beyond – that would provide access to more fine-grained and longer-term information on the inputs, outputs and outcomes of research is not only technically feasible but desirable from the perspective of both policymaking and practice, in line with current trends to extend the use of research information systems and the launch of several initiatives to integrate or link these systems at institutional, national and European level. It is also in line with current initiatives at a global level, notably the US NSF/NIH Star Metrics programme, offering some prospect in the longer term of establishing an internationally integrated system.  The desirability of a transnational system for research performance assessment A transnational research performance assessment system collecting information at the micro-level via nationally-based research information systems appears to offer significant added value,  The current experience with national research information systems shows the value of these systems in terms of an improvement of strategy development and capacity for all stakeholders involved   The efficiency and effectiveness gains that the national research information systems produced at the national level can be expected to occur also in the case of a European system, in particular in relation to the costs currently covered by the European Commission for the collection of the needed micro-data  EU-SPRI Conference 2014  Booklet of Abstract  233   Finally, the centrality of the research actors in the national research information systems and the search for a development path that realises the potential of such systems for both policy and research purposes as well as the alignment with the policies of open access to data cannot but be a positive factor also for extending the system to the European level  Our research suggests that benefits provided by an integrated European research information infrastructure would include   For research institutions: the opportunity to compare and benchmark research performance with other institutions in Europe, going well beyond what is possible with bibliometric indicators alone  For national funding agencies and policy makers: a comprehensive view of the complementarities of national research strategies versus other countries and the European Commission; improved basis for comparisons and benchmarking of national research performance with other countries    For the European Commission: improved efficiency in the collection of micro-data, improving data availability, reducing duplicates and enhancing the sustainability of data collection efforts  For the research performance assessment community at large: the basis for an improved understanding of knowledge exchange mechanisms in the European research system, providing a comprehensive view on input and outputs We consider it desirable that policy-makers at the highest levels in the European system make use of the opportunities offered by the latest developments in communication and information technologies and exploit the momentum created by the current development of national research information systems.  This would also ensure avoidance of the risk for a completely business-driven approach to the use of research information systems; it is not clear that such an outcome would serve the interests of researchers, funders or policymakers.   European policy-makers should therefore start setting the basis for the development of a European integrated research information system that would enable sharing data on research across the European Research Area – and beyond.    The feasibility of a European integrated research information infrastructure Technically, a European Integrated Research Information Infrastructure is feasible thanks to recent technological developments and especially the maturity of the European CERIF standard, which allows seamless interlinking of datasets and/or research information systems, in different formats and including non-CERIF systems. Lack of compatibility of data in different systems does not necessarily constitute an insurmountable problem thanks to the availability of semantic tools. However, a standard approach is needed to the definition of outputs and indicators to allow data to be used in generating indicators.   A European integrated research information infrastructure is consistent with the current policy framework in the European Union.  It would not be a substitute for existing national research information systems but an additional layer on top of them. It should comprise a EU-SPRI Conference 2014  Booklet of Abstract  234  distributed infrastructure, inter-connecting existing national research information systems.  With such architecture development costs should not be prohibitive. The entire process will require a joint effort from all Member States and the relevant stakeholder communities.  All our interviewees, however, considered that the achievement of a common system or approach was not manageable only through bottom-up initiatives. Early-stage steering of the process towards integration at the European level is fundamental and the European Commission is probably the only credible coordinator.  Indeed, existing EU projects such as OpenAire in the field of Open Access Repositories and Eudat in the Public Sector Information sphere illustrate that the European Commission has already begun to take on parts of this role – though so far in too decentralised a fashion.    Taking care with indicators An important caveat in thinking about the kind of developments discussed here relates to well-known problems associated with indicators and indicator systems, as a result of which their use is contested.  These limitations include  The problems of bibliometrics that include English-language bias, poor coverage in the social sciences and humanities, difficulties in accounting for differences in behaviour and the nature of research in different fields, and so on  Specific abuses, such as the use of journal impact factors as proxies for the quality of specific articles or researchers’ outputs  Their tendency to indicate only things that are easy to count, while not necessarily capturing other things that may be more important  The poor state of indicator development in relation to innovation and the even poorer state in relation to the ‘societal challenges’  Their tendency to induce ‘gaming’ and other perverse effects All of these (and more) are pertinent to attempting to federate research information and assessment systems at the European level, as they are in other systems.  They do not invalidate the project but they do require the use of at least the same level of intelligence in system design and interpreting results as is needed at other levels.     

English

Can we support European research and innovation policymaking by federating information systems?

NARCIS 

http://doc.utwente.nl/97544/1/Mahieu%20Arnold.pdf

Can we support European research and innovation policymaking by federating information systems?

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

University of Twente Research Information

NARCIS