Topham, Clinton D

English

Purdue E-Pubs

Road School Preprint - Page 39Road School Preprint - Page 40Road School Preprint - Page 41Road School Preprint - Page 42Road School Preprint - Page 43Road School Preprint - Page 44Road School Preprint - Page 45Road School Preprint - Page 46Road School Preprint - Page 47Road School Preprint - Page 48Road School Preprint - Page 49Road School Preprint - Page 50Road School Preprint - Page 51Road School Preprint - Page 52Road School Preprint - Page 53Request for Qualifications (RFQ)Rating Guidelines+ Very Highly Qualified + Highly Qualified QualifiedMarginally Qualified Not QualifiedRoad School Preprint - Page 54Procurement StrategyRequest for Qualifications (RFQ)Evaluation Criteria♦ Legal and Financial ♦ Record of Performance• Legal Structure • Cost and Schedule• Financial Profile Performance♦ Organization and Experience * Penalt'es an<* Termination’s• Organization^ Structure * Record of Meeting^ Regulatory Requirements• Organization Charts __ ^ ,„ • Ratios ot Change Orders and• Proposer Experience Claims to Tota, Project CostsKey Staff Background and . Experience with Award FeeExperience Contracts♦ Project Approach « Certification• Project Risk• Project Management• Project Administration• Planning and ExecutionRoad School Preprint - Page 55Selection Schedule♦ D/B decision - Jan 1996♦ Three teams selected — July 26,1996♦ RFP issued — Oct. 1,1996♦ Proposals received — Jan. 15,1997♦ BAFOs received — March 7,1997♦ Selection announced March 26,1997♦ Notice To Proceed - April 15,1997Road School Preprint - Page 56Evaluation Process♦ Most rigorous review ever.♦ Proposals reviewed for completeness.♦ Oral presentations made.♦ Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) reviews 15 different aspects.Road School Preprint - Page 57Price & Proposal Evaluation♦ Blinded review by Price Evaluation Team(PET)♦ TEB and PET make recommendations toProposal Evaluation Board (PEB)♦ PEB makes final recommendation toSelection Official♦ Final selection announced March 26Road School Preprint - Page 58The Selection Process:A ReviewRoad School Preprint - Page 59Price Evaluation■ Based on:■ Realism■ AccuracyRoad School Preprint - Page 60Performance Specifications♦ Drainage ♦ Management of Traffic♦ Roadway Geometries ♦ Maintenance During♦ Geotechnical Construction♦ Water Quality ♦ Maintenance After♦ Lighting Construction♦ Pavements * ATMS♦ Signing * Concrete Barriers♦ Traffic Signals * Landscape & Aesthetics♦ StructuresRoad School Preprint - Page 61Rating Guidelines■ Automated Transportation Management System (ATMS)■ Drainage / Water Quality■ Aesthetics■ Roadway Geometries■ Lighting / Signals / Signing■ Harmful / Hazardous Materials Remediation■ Concrete BarriersRoad School Preprint - Page 62Rating Guidelines■ Organization Qualifications■ Management■ Work Plan / Schedule■ Maintenance of Traffic■ Geotechnical■ Pavement■ Structures■ MaintainabilityRoad School Preprint - Page 63TEB Rating Guidelines♦ Exceptional (E)♦ Good (G)♦ Acceptable (A)♦ Susceptible to becoming acceptable (S)♦ Unacceptable (U)♦ Pluses (+) and minuses (-) added if neededRoad School Preprint - Page 64Road School Preprint - Page 65Technical SubfactorsRoad School Preprint - Page 66Overall Rating■ Lake Bonneville A+■ Salt Lake G-■ Wasatch E-Road School Preprint - Page 67Wasatch Constructors♦ Kiewit Pacific* ♦ MK Centennial♦ Granite Construction* ♦ URS Consultants Inc.♦ Washington* ♦ Greiner Inc.♦ Sverdrup ♦ H.W. Lochner Inc.♦ DeLeuw CatherRoad School Preprint - Page 68Technical Evaluation BoardResults♦ RIP Completion DateWasatch “Value Added” July 15, 2001Road School Preprint - Page 69Best Value SelectionRoad School Preprint - Page 70Stipends♦ $950,000♦ Ownership of concepts♦ Recognition of Contractor InvestmentRoad School Preprint - Page 71Road School Preprint - Page 72WASATCH CONSTRUCTORS BASECONTRACTI-15 Reconstruction Monthly Payment ScheduleRoad School Preprint - Page 73Other Concepts♦ Partnering♦ OCIP (Owner Controlled Insurance Program)* (Savings: $ 10 -15 M)♦ Expedited Payment•- (Savings: $ 30 M)♦ Public Information Program♦ 4 CD-ROMS♦ SubcontractingRoad School Preprint - Page 74OCIP- Wr Up♦Workers Compensation ♦ General Liability ♦Errors & Omissions ♦Builders Risk ♦Environmental RiskRoad School Preprint - Page 75Traditional UDOT Role vsDesign/BuildRoad School Preprint - Page 76Traditional Role UDOT♦ Design Review♦ Issue Resolution♦ Construction Management♦ Inspection♦ Material TestingRoad School Preprint - Page 77Design/Build RoleUDOT Wasatch■ Oversight ♦ Design Review♦ Issue Resolution♦ Construction Management♦ Inspection♦ Material TestingRoad School Preprint - Page 78Risk ChartRoad School Preprint - Page 79Award Fee♦ Philosophy/Benefits:*- Motivates contractor to quality performance desired by owner❖ timely performance❖ quality of work❖ management❖ community relations/maintenance of trafficPositive means of achieving desired results*■ Incentivize performance throughout project (not just an end)»■ Financial incentive to contractor Consistent with partnering♦ Proven and SuccessfulRoad School Preprint - Page 80Lessons Learned♦ Level of Design ♦ Public Information♦ Utility Agreements ♦ Industry Acceptance!♦ Cost Estimate ♦ Award Fee♦ Statutory Requirements ♦ Audits♦ Design ReviewRoad School Preprint - Page 81What's the PublicThinking?Road School Preprint - Page 82Road School Preprint - Page 83Steps in the Procurement Process♦ MAR 96♦ 15 MAY 96♦ 30 MAY 96♦ 18 JUL 96♦ FEB-SEP 96♦ AUG-SEP 96♦ 1 OCT 96♦ 23 OCT-1 DEC 96♦ 15 JAN 97♦ JAN-FEB 97♦ FEB-MAR 97♦ APR 97♦ 14 APR 97Road School Preprint - Page 84♦ Request for letters of Interest♦ Informational Meeting♦ Request for Qualifications (RFQ)♦ Selection of Prequalified♦ Develop Request for Proposals (RFP)♦ Review Draft RFP♦ Issue RFP♦ Technical Concepts Review♦ Receive Proposals♦ Evaluation of Proposals (initial)♦ Discussion and BAFO (if required)♦ Best Value Selection♦ Award/Notice to Proceed (NTP)Project StatisticsRoad School Preprint - Page 85Construction Scope of Work♦ 6.9 Million cubic meters embankment♦ 2.1 million square meters concrete pavement♦ 390,000 square meters of bridge »-143 bridges total♦ 128,000 square meters of retaining walls♦ 70,000 meters of drainage facilitiesRoad School Preprint - Page 86Construction Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 2.5 million meters of wick drain+■ 1,553 Miles of wick drain❖ Enough to go to on a round trip from Salt Lake to San Diego, California❖ Enough to go from Salt Lake to Houston, TexasRoad School Preprint - Page 87Road School Preprint - Page 88Road School Preprint - Page 89Construction Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 3.1 million cubic meters of fill*- 4.05 million cubic yards❖ 7.5 million tons✓ 178,400 belly dump truck and pup loads♦ 1.3 million cubic meters of excavation*-1.7 million cubic yards❖ 3.15 million tons moved on siteRoad School Preprint - Page 90Road School Preprint - Page 91Road School Preprint - Page 92Construction Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 21,200 square meters of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE)wall25,400 square yards of single stage, two stage, and three stage retaining wall♦ 42 bridges demolishedRoad School Preprint - Page 93Road School Preprint - Page 94Road School Preprint - Page 95Road School Preprint - Page 96Construction Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 36,600 meters of pile driven<+120,100 feet of piling❖ 22.75 miles♦ 770,000 hours labor■►370 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 97Road School Preprint - Page 98Road School Preprint - Page 99Design Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 2,146 Quality Audits have been performed♦ 436 packages have been approved for construction♦ Over 5,455 plan sheets have been released for construction•+ 2,587 of 12,000 final plansRoad School Preprint - Page 100Design Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ Design Services during construction +■ 295 shop drawing submittals 96 major field design changesRoad School Preprint - Page 101Road School Preprint - Page 102Design Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 15 Design Subcontractors♦ 420 Design Professionals♦ 1,060,000 hours labor ■►510 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 103Road School Preprint - Page 104A TMS Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 5 Field Crews♦ 15 Design Professionals♦ 56,000 hours labor27 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 105ATMS Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 65 Traffic Controllers and Cabinets replaced♦ 4 large VMS signs placed and operational on freeway system♦ 7 Communication hub buildings installedRoad School Preprint - Page 106Road School Preprint - Page 107A TMS Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ 109 km of communication conduit placed + 68 miles♦ 17 km of fiber optic cable pulled into conduit11 miles♦ 300 Vehicle Detector Loops installed on 1-215 WestRoad School Preprint - Page 108Road School Preprint - Page 109Project StatsUDOT and Wasatch Management(42 weeks from NTP)♦ 85 Managers and administrative personnel♦ 178,500 hours labor+- 86 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 110Project StatsQuality Control!Quality Assurance(42 weeks from NTP)♦ 105 QA/QC inspectors in the fieldBegan inspections in June 1997♦ 178,500 hours labor86 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 111Project Stats (42 weeks from NTP)♦ Construction 770,000 Hours♦ Design 1,060,000 Hours♦ ATMS 56,000 Hours♦ Management 178,500 Hours♦ QA/QC 178.500 HoursTotal 2,243,000 Hours•-1,078 years of time investedRoad School Preprint - Page 112Road School Preprint - Page 113Road School Preprint - Page 114

Utah I-15 Design/Build Project

https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3747&amp;context=roadschool

Utah I-15 Design/Build Project

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Purdue E-Pubs