On July 21, 1992, six outside directors on the board of Westar Mining Ltd. resigned abruptly from the company\u27s board of directors. Westar was a troubled mining company operating in British Columbia. In 1991, the company had lost 62.2million,mainlyastheresultofapoorlyperformingexportcoalmine.Whileresigningfromtheboard,thedirectorsassuredthepublicthattherehadbeennowrongdoingbythecompany.Rather,thereasonfortheirdeparturewasrelatedtoconcernoverpersonalliabilityforwagesandotherbenefitsthatmightbeowedtomorethan1900ofthecompany2˘7semployeesunderprovincialemploymentstandardslegislationshouldthecompanybecomeinsolvent.Despitethefactthattheirdeparturemightnotabsolvethemfromliabilityforotherdutiesandwouldgreatlycomplicatethecompany2˘7sbidforsurvival,thesizeofthepersonalliabilitiestheyfaced−morethan20 million - left the directors little choice.
Predictably, the announcement of the resignations created considerable consternation in the financial community, the magnitude of which was enhanced when, just one week after the Westar resignations, the entire board of PWA Corp. resigned en masse from the boards of each of its subsidiaries, including Canadian Airlines Ltd. As in the case of Westar, the directors attributed their decision to the fear that they would be forced to pay employee wages, taxes or some other obligation out of their own pockets should the struggling airline run out of money .
These highly publicized defections have been invoked by critics as exemplifying the rather myopic and unthinking addiction that Canadian governments have developed to the elixir of directors\u27 liability. By one legal practitioner\u27s account, in Ontario alone more than 100 different federal and provincial statutes prescribe some type of directors\u27 liability. Some critics have gone further and have viewed the board resignations as a powerful passion play that demonstrates in vivid terms the callous and hostile treatment that Canadian shareholders and business managers can expect to receive at the hands of populist legislatures
