Summary of Egan v. Chambers, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. 25

Abstract

The Court reexamined whether NRS 41A.071\u27s affidavit-of-merit requirement applies to claims for professional negligence, which it had answered only a few years ago in Fierle v. Perez. The Court held that the plain and unambiguous language of NRS 41A.071 indicates that professional negligence actions are not subject to its affidavit-of-merit requirement, which applies only to medical or dental malpractice actions

    Similar works