Religious freedom as a practice of the nation: religious minorities, Islamic revival and the emergence of defensive inclusion in Turkey
- Publication date
- Publisher
Abstract
Depending on fieldwork (semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and
archival research) in Istanbul, I explore the impact of Islamic revival on the relationship
between the state and non-Muslim minorities in Turkey and show there are important
reforms shifting state policies toward non-Muslim minorities after the Islamicly-oriented
Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi or AK Party) government
came to power in 2002. I analyze the impact of the nation on the state and the
reconstruction of the nation and the state through renewed local/global structures and
actors in historical context to explain the meaning of recent changes.
The Ottoman millet system produced a pre-modern form of religious pluralism
until the rise of nationalism in the nineteenth century although non-Muslim minorities
were second-class subjects to Muslims. After the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, the
emergence of modern Turkey as a “nationalizing state” seeking ethnic, linguistic, and
religious homogeneity under the rule of the secularist Kemalist elites produced an
exclusionary polity toward non-Muslim minorities. Islamic movements constructed an
alternative nationhood narrative based on the glorified Ottoman past as a reaction to the
Kemalist narratives maligning the Ottomans since the early years of the Republic. Yet, it
was also an exclusionary narrative accusing religious minorities of collaborating with
western powers and of being responsible for the collapse the Ottoman Empire. However,
Islamic movements have reconstructed the Ottoman past as a usable past through the
narratives of Ottoman tolerance and identified the Turkish nation with tolerance in a
defensive manner as a response to the globalization process that poses serious legitimacy
concerns over Islamic movements through the identification of Islam with religious
fanaticism. This identity politics, which I call defensive inclusion, has resonated with the
emergence of a better relationship between Islamic movements and religious minorities
for a few decades and the positive shift in state policies toward religious minorities since
2002. However, Turkish/Islamic national identity does not perceive non-Muslims as part
of the Turkish nation, but those who live with Turks under the rule of Turkish tolerance
even if they are full citizens de jure. This situation, which I call neo-millet system,
reproduces the second-class status of non-Muslim minorities in a polity operating through
modern institutions even if the state is hospitable.
This dissertation not only challenges mainstream theories including the
Civilizational Approach, Modernization Theory, Assertive vs. Passive Secularism, and
Rational Choice Theory that account for the origin of religious freedom by revealing their
weaknesses to explain the Turkish case, but also offers an alternative approach by
examining religious freedom or the dynamics of inclusion/exclusion of religious
minorities as a practice of the nation. This dissertation also engages with the ongoing
debate about the relationship between globalization and the revival of identity politics.
Contrary to mainstream theories suggesting that the revival of identity politics based on
the reinvention of the past under the impact of globalization triggers religious fanaticism,
this dissertation shows that identity politics based on a constructed past paves the way of
the emergence of religious tolerance within Turkish/Islamic circles. This dissertation also
sheds light on the progressive role of the past/tradition in the moderation of Islamic
movements and the construction of a legitimate Islamic identity that embraces
multiculturalism and tolerance in the globalized world