Upon publication of the original article [1], it was noticed that Dr Papanicolaou&rsquo;s surname was spelt incorrectly. The correct spelling is &ldquo;Papanicolaou&rdquo;, as shown in the author list of this erratum.Additional co-authors: A. Anderson, S. Asgari, P. G. Board, A. Bretschneider, P. M. Campbell, T. Chertemps, J. T. Christeller, C. W. Coppin, S. J. Downes, G. Duan, C. A. Farnsworth, R. T. Good, L. B. Han, Y. C. Han, K. Hatje, I. Horne, Y. P. Huang, D. S. T. Hughes, E. Jacquin-Joly, W. James, S. Jhangiani, M. Kollmar, S. S. Kuwar, S. Li, N-Y. Liu, M. T. Maibeche, J. R. Miller, N. Montagne, T. Perry, J. Qu, S. V. Song, G. G. Sutton, H. Vogel, B. P. Walenz, W. Xu, H-J. Zhang, Z. Zou, P. Batterham, O. R. Edwards, R. Feyereisen, R. A. Gibbs, D. G. Heckel, A. McGrath, C. Robin, S. E. Scherer, K. C. Worley, Y. D. W

Anderson, Alisha

Anderson, Craig

Clarke, David F

East, Peter D

Elfekih, Samia

Gordon, Karl

Jermiin, Lars S

McGaughran, Angela

Oakeshott, John G

Papanicolaou, Alexandros

Pearce, Stephen L

Perera, Omaththage P

Rane, Rahul V

Richards, Stephen

Tay, Wee Tek

Walsh, Thomas K

English

Stirling Online Research Repository

Pearce et al. BMC Biology  (2017) 15:69 DOI 10.1186/s12915-017-0413-3ERRATUM Open AccessErratum to: Genomic innovations,transcriptional plasticity and gene lossunderlying the evolution and divergenceof two highly polyphagous and invasiveHelicoverpa pest speciesS. L. Pearce1, D. F. Clarke1,2, P. D. East1, S. Elfekih1, K. H. J. Gordon1*, L. S. Jermiin1, A. McGaughran1,3,J. G. Oakeshott1*, A. Papanicolaou1,4, O. P. Perera5, R. V. Rane1,2, S. Richards6*, W. T. Tay1, T. K. Walsh1, A. Anderson1,C. J. Anderson1,7, S. Asgari8, P. G. Board9, A. Bretschneider10, P. M. Campbell1, T. Chertemps11,12, J. T. Christeller13,C. W. Coppin1, S. J. Downes14, G. Duan3, C. A. Farnsworth1, R. T. Good2, L. B. Han15, Y. C. Han1,16, K. Hatje17,I. Horne1, Y. P. Huang18, D. S. T. Hughes6, E. Jacquin-Joly12, W. James1, S. Jhangiani6, M. Kollmar17, S. S. Kuwar10,S. Li1, N-Y. Liu1,19, M. T. Maibeche11,12, J. R. Miller20, N. Montagne11, T. Perry2, J. Qu6, S. V. Song2, G. G. Sutton20,H. Vogel10, B. P. Walenz20, W. Xu1,21, H-J. Zhang1,22, Z. Zou15, P. Batterham2, O. R. Edwards23, R. Feyereisen24,R. A. Gibbs6, D. G. Heckel10, A. McGrath1, C. Robin2, S. E. Scherer6, K. C. Worley6 and Y. D. Wu16ErratumUpon publication of the original article [1], it wasnoticed that Dr Papanicolaou’s surname was speltincorrectly. The correct spelling is “Papanicolaou”, asshown in the author list of this erratum.Author details1CSIRO Black Mountain, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia. 2Schoolof Biological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia.3Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT,Australia. 4Hawksbury Institute for the Environment, Western SydneyUniversity, Penrith, NSW, Australia. 5Southern Insect Management ResearchUnit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS, USA. 6Human Genome Sequencing Center,Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 7Biological and EnvironmentalSciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. 8School of Biological Sciences,University of Queensland, Brisbane St Lucia, QLD, Australia. 9John CurtinSchool of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT,Australia. 10Max Planck Institute of Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.11Sorbonnes Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, Institute of Ecology andEnvironmental Sciences of Paris, Paris, France. 12National Institute forAgricultural Research (INRA), Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciencesof Paris, Versailles, France. 13Plant and Food Research, Mt Albert, Auckland,New Zealand. 14CSIRO, Narrabri, NSW, Australia. 15State Key Laboratory ofIntegrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. 16College of PlantProtection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 17MaxPlanck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Gottingen, Germany. 18Institute of* Correspondence: karl.gordon@csiro.au; john.oakeshott@csiro.au;stephenr@bcm.edu1CSIRO Black Mountain, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia6Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston,TX, USA© Gordon et al. 2017 Open Access This articlInternational License (http://creativecommonsreproduction in any medium, provided you gthe Creative Commons license, and indicate if(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zePlant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. 19Key Laboratory of ForestDisaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, Southwest ForestryUniversity, Kunming 650224, China. 20J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD,USA. 21School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, WA,Australia. 22Chongqing Key Laboratory of Biochemistry and MolecularPharmacology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.23CSIRO, Floreat Park, WA, Australia. 24Department of Plant andEnvironmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej,Denmark.Received: 1 August 2017 Accepted: 7 August 2017Reference1. Pearce SL, Clarke DF, East PD, Elfekih S, Gordon KHJ, Jermiin LS,McGaughran A, Oakeshott JG, Papanikolaou A, Perera OP, Rane RV, RichardsS, Tay WT, Walsh TK, Anderson A, Anderson CJ, Asgari S, Board PG,Bretschneider A, Campbell PM, Chertemps T, Christeller JT, Coppin CW,Downes SJ, Duan G, Farnsworth CA, Good RT, Han LB, Han YC, Hatje K,Horne I, Huang YP, Hughes DST, Jacquin-Joly E, James W, Jhangiani S,Kollmar M, Kuwar SS, Li S, Liu NY, Maibeche MT, Miller JR, Montagne N,Perry T, Qu J, Song SV, Sutton GG, Vogel H, Walenz BP, Xu W, Zhang HJ,Zou Z, Batterham P, Edwards OR, Feyereisen R, Gibbs RA, Heckel DG,McGrath A, Robin C, Scherer SE, Worley KC, Wu YD. Genomic innovations,transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution anddivergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pestspecies. BMC Biol. 2017;15:63. doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0402-6.e is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andive appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link tochanges were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiverro/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Erratum to: Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

Background&nbsp; Helicoverpa armigera&nbsp;and Helicoverpa zea&nbsp;are major caterpillar pests of Old and New World agriculture, respectively. Both, particularly H. armigera, are extremely polyphagous, and H. armigera&nbsp;has developed resistance to many insecticides. Here we use comparative genomics, transcriptomics and resequencing to elucidate the genetic basis for their properties as pests.&nbsp;  Results&nbsp; We find that, prior to their divergence about 1.5 Mya, the H. armigera/H. zea lineage had accumulated up to more than 100 more members of specific detoxification and digestion gene families and more than 100 extra gustatory receptor genes, compared to other lepidopterans with narrower host ranges. The two genomes remain very similar in gene content and order, but H. armigera&nbsp;is more polymorphic overall, and H. zea&nbsp;has lost several detoxification genes, as well as about 50 gustatory receptor genes.It also lacks certain genes and alleles conferring insecticide resistance found in H. armigera. Non-synonymous sites in the expanded gene families above are rapidly diverging, both between paralogues and between orthologues in the two species. Whole genome transcriptomic analyses of H. armigera&nbsp;larvae show widely divergent responses to different host plants, including responses among many of the duplicated detoxification and digestion genes.&nbsp;  Conclusions&nbsp; The extreme polyphagy of the two heliothines is associated with extensive amplification and neofunctionalisation of genes involved in host finding and use, coupled with versatile transcriptional responses on different hosts. H. armigera&rsquo;s&nbsp;invasion of the Americas in recent years means that hybridisation could generate populations that are both locally adapted and insecticide resistant

Stirling Online Research Repository (RIOXX)

Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

Upon publication of the original article [1], it was noticed that Dr Papanicolaou&rsquo;s surname was spelt incorrectly. The correct spelling is &ldquo;Papanicolaou&rdquo;, as shown in the author list of this erratum

Background&nbsp; Helicoverpa armigera&nbsp;and Helicoverpa zea&nbsp;are major caterpillar pests of Old and New World agriculture, respectively. Both, particularly H. armigera, are extremely polyphagous, and H. armigera&nbsp;has developed resistance to many insecticides. Here we use comparative genomics, transcriptomics and resequencing to elucidate the genetic basis for their properties as pests.&nbsp;  Results&nbsp; We find that, prior to their divergence about 1.5 Mya, the H. armigera/H. zea lineage had accumulated up to more than 100 more members of specific detoxification and digestion gene families and more than 100 extra gustatory receptor genes, compared to other lepidopterans with narrower host ranges. The two genomes remain very similar in gene content and order, but H. armigera&nbsp;is more polymorphic overall, and H. zea&nbsp;has lost several detoxification genes, as well as about 50 gustatory receptor genes.It also lacks certain genes and alleles conferring insecticide resistance found in H. armigera. Non-synonymous sites in the expanded gene families above are rapidly diverging, both between paralogues and between orthologues in the two species. Whole genome transcriptomic analyses of H. armigera&nbsp;larvae show widely divergent responses to different host plants, including responses among many of the duplicated detoxification and digestion genes.&nbsp;  Conclusions&nbsp; The extreme polyphagy of the two heliothines is associated with extensive amplification and neofunctionalisation of genes involved in host finding and use, coupled with versatile transcriptional responses on different hosts. H. armigera&rsquo;s&nbsp;invasion of the Americas in recent years means that hybridisation could generate populations that are both locally adapted and insecticide resistant.Additional co-authors: S. Asgari, P. G. Board, A. Bretschneider, P. M. Campbell, T. Chertemps, J. T. Christeller, C. W. Coppin, S. J. Downes, G. Duan, C. A. Farnsworth, R. T. Good, L. B. Han, Y. C. Han, K. Hatje, I. Horne, Y. P Huang, D. S. T. Hughes, E. Jacquin-Joly, W. James, S. Jhangiani, M. Kollmar, S. S. Kuwar, S. Li, N-Y. Liu, M. T. Maibeche, J. R. Miller, N. Montagne, T. Perry, J. Qu, S. V. Song, G. G. Sutton, H. Vogel, B. P. Walenz, W. Xu, H-J. Zhang, Z. Zou, P. Batterham, O. R. Edwards, R. Feyereisen, R. A. Gibbs, D. G. Heckel, A. McGrath, C. Robin, S. E. Scherer, K. C. Worley and Y. D. W

http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/26172/1/10.1186%252Fs12915-017-0413-3.pdf

Erratum to: Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Stirling Online Research Repository

Stirling Online Research Repository (RIOXX)

Stirling Online Research Repository (RIOXX)

Stirling Online Research Repository

Stirling Online Research Repository (RIOXX)

Stirling Online Research Repository (RIOXX)