This thesis examines the link between legislative reforms, crime and the makeshift strategies that
the poor used to support their households in the Medway basin and rural districts in north Oxfordshire
between 1830 and 1885. In short, this thesis considers whether the poor relied on different criminal
strategies to maintain their makeshift households in both rural and urban environments. To this end,
it examines how the labouring population in the two regions coped with a raft of legislative reforms
and the sort of socio-economic changes that occurred over the longer term. This thesis also
demonstrates how the technique of Record Linkage can help eliminate some of the problems that
arise when data-sets are incomplete or when source documents are missing. To fulfill these
objectives, this thesis is divided into eight chapters. The first of these outlines the research
questions and definitions that are used throughout this survey. Chapter two engages with the
current historiography that relates to the study of crime and poverty in Kent and Oxfordshire in the
nineteenth century. It establishes how this thesis improves our understanding of the way that
legislative reforms and socio-economic change helped to shape the criminal strategies that the
labouring poor utilised in the two regions, between 1830 and 1885. Chapter three identifies the
socio-economic emergence of the Medway basin as an industrial centre and explains why similar
changes did not occur in Oxfordshire. The chapters which follow detail how population growth and
industrial development affected labour markets and the distribution of welfare in the two regions.
In doing so. they establish whether the poor in the two regions were reliant on the proceeds of crime
to support their makeshift households. or whether they simply exploited weaknesses in the
administration of local government institutions. so that they might improve the state of their
household economies. When considered together, this thesis establishes that crime was one of the
components that the labouring poor in Kent and Oxfordshire used to support their makeshift
economies, when legislative reforms and socio-economic change threatened to undermine the
solvency of their households