This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from the Royal College of General Practitioners via http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X68740

Usher-Smith, Juliet

Walter, Fiona Mary

Watson, Eila

Yadlapalli, Suresh

PubMed

Fiona M Walter

Juliet A Usher-Smith

Suresh Yadlapalli

Eila Watson

Crossref

British Journal of General Practice

Caring for people living with, and beyond, cancer: an online survey of GPs in England

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people are living with, and beyond, cancer. They are at risk of long-term morbidity and premature mortality due to the consequences of their disease and its treatment. Primary care can contribute to providing ongoing care. AIM: To determine the current practice and views of GPs in England regarding cancer survivorship care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Online survey of a sample of 500 GPs, stratified by NHS region in England. METHOD: The survey included questions adapted from prior surveys assessing physician knowledge and attitudes regarding care of patients with cancer. RESULTS: In total, 500 GPs responded; approximately half reported often providing care to people living beyond cancer for treatment-related side effects (51%), psychological symptoms (65%), and lifestyle advice (55%). Only 29% felt very confident managing treatment-related side effects compared with 46% and 65% for psychological symptoms and lifestyle advice respectively. Half reported usually receiving cancer treatment summaries and survivorship care plans but most of the sample felt these would improve their ability to provide care (76%). Only 53% were convinced of the usefulness of cancer care reviews. Although most felt that primary and specialist care should share responsibility for managing bone (81%) and cardiovascular (77%) health consequences, fewer than half reported often taking previous history of cancer or cancer treatment into consideration when assessing bone health; only one-fifth did this in relation to cardiovascular health. Most responders were interested in receiving education to improve their knowledge and expertise. CONCLUSION: GPs have a potentially important role to play in caring for people following cancer treatment. This study has highlighted areas where further support and education are needed to enable GPs to optimise their role in cancer survivorship care.The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) is funding JU-S as a NIHR Clinical Lecturer and FMW as a NIHR Clinician Scientist.  
Macmillan Cancer Support, a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales (2400969) and a charity registered in England and Wales (261017) and in Scotland (SCO39907 funded part of the research. The funders contributed to the questionnaire, but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Oxford Brookes University also contributed to the research funding.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from the Royal College of General Practitioners via http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X68740

Walter, Fiona M

Usher-Smith, Juliet A

Apollo (Cambridge)

Caring for people living with, and beyond, cancer: an online survey of GPs in England.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of people are living with, and beyond, cancer. They are at risk of long-term morbidity and premature mortality due to the consequences of their disease and its treatment. Primary care can contribute to providing ongoing care. AIM: To determine the current practice and views of GPs in England regarding cancer survivorship care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Online survey of a sample of 500 GPs, stratified by NHS region in England. METHOD: The survey included questions adapted from prior surveys assessing physician knowledge and attitudes regarding care of patients with cancer. RESULTS: In total, 500 GPs responded; approximately half reported often providing care to people living beyond cancer for treatment-related side effects (51%), psychological symptoms (65%), and lifestyle advice (55%). Only 29% felt very confident managing treatment-related side effects compared with 46% and 65% for psychological symptoms and lifestyle advice respectively. Half reported usually receiving cancer treatment summaries and survivorship care plans but most of the sample felt these would improve their ability to provide care (76%). Only 53% were convinced of the usefulness of cancer care reviews. Although most felt that primary and specialist care should share responsibility for managing bone (81%) and cardiovascular (77%) health consequences, fewer than half reported often taking previous history of cancer or cancer treatment into consideration when assessing bone health; only one-fifth did this in relation to cardiovascular health. Most responders were interested in receiving education to improve their knowledge and expertise. CONCLUSION: GPs have a potentially important role to play in caring for people following cancer treatment. This study has highlighted areas where further support and education are needed to enable GPs to optimise their role in cancer survivorship care

Walter, FM

Usher-Smith, JA

Yadlapalli, S

Watson, E

University of Melbourne Institutional Repository

BACKGROUND. Increasing numbers of people are living with, and beyond, cancer. They are at risk of long-term morbidity and premature mortality due to the consequences of their disease and its treatment. Primary care can contribute to providing ongoing care.\nAIM\nTo determine the current practice and views of GPs in England regarding cancer survivorship care.

DESIGN AND SETTING. Online survey of a sample of 500 GPs, stratified by NHS region in England.

METHOD. The survey included questions adapted from prior surveys assessing physician knowledge and attitudes regarding care of patients with cancer.\nRESULTS\nIn total, 500 GPs responded; approximately half reported often providing care to people living beyond cancer for treatment-related side effects (51%), psychological symptoms (65%), and lifestyle advice (55%). Only 29% felt very confident managing treatment-related side effects compared with 46% and 65% for psychological symptoms and lifestyle advice respectively. Half reported usually receiving cancer treatment summaries and survivorship care plans but most of the sample felt these would improve their ability to provide care (76%). Only 53% were convinced of the usefulness of cancer care reviews. Although most felt that primary and specialist care should share responsibility for managing bone (81%) and cardiovascular (77%) health consequences, fewer than half reported often taking previous history of cancer or cancer treatment into consideration when assessing bone health; only one-fifth did this in relation to cardiovascular health. Most responders were interested in receiving education to improve their knowledge and expertise.

CONCLUSION. GPs have a potentially important role to play in caring for people following cancer treatment. This study has highlighted areas where further support and education are needed to enable GPs to optimise their role in cancer survivorship care

Walter, F

Usher-Smith, J

Oxford Brookes University: RADAR

Caring for people living with, and beyond, cancer: an online survey of GPs in England

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Crossref

Apollo (Cambridge)

University of Melbourne Institutional Repository

Oxford Brookes University: RADAR

Apollo (Cambridge)