As the dust begins to settle on the 2017 General Election campaign, Graeme Baxter, Simon Burnett, John Isaacs, Iain MacLeod, Sarah Pedersen, and Elizabeth Tait reflect upon the Twitter response to the two televised Scottish leaders’ debates held in the lead-up to polling day

Baxter, Graeme

Burnett, Simon

Isaacs, John

MacLeod, Iain

Pedersen, Sarah

Tait, Elizabeth

LSE Research Online

7/7/2017 Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings | British Politics and Policy at LSEhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/scottish-leaders-debates-on-twitter-sturgeon-davidson-and-indyref2-dominated-proceedings/ 1/5Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’dominated proceedingsAs the dust begins to settle on the 2017 General Election campaign, Graeme Baxter, SimonBurnett, John Isaacs, Iain MacLeod, Sarah Pedersen, and Elizabeth Tait reflect upon the Twitterresponse to the two televised Scottish leaders’ debates held in the lead-up to polling day.Continuing a longitudinal study that has previously investigated Twitter response to televised debatesduring the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum and the 2015 General Election campaigns, theresearch team at Robert Gordon University collected and analysed those tweets sent during the twoevents that contained the hashtags promoted by the programme makers.The first debate, broadcast by the BBC, was held at the Mansfield Traquair Centre in Edinburgh, onSunday, 21st May. Here, the panel consisted of six Scottish party leaders: Nicola Sturgeon (SNP),Ruth Davidson (Conservatives), Kezia Dugdale (Labour), Willie Rennie (Lib Dems), Patrick Harvie(co-convener of the Scottish Greens, and the only one of the six actually standing for election toWestminster), and David Coburn (UKIP). During this debate, over 47,000 tweets containing theprogramme’s #LeadersDebate hashtag were captured.The second debate (originally scheduled for 24th May, but cancelled because of the Manchesterbombing attack) came from the Tron Theatre in Glasgow and was broadcast by STV on 6th June.Neither Coburn nor Harvie was invited to participate in this event, the latter’s exclusion provingparticularly controversial. Compared to the first debate, less than half the number of tweets (just over22,000) using the programme makers’ hashtag #ScotDebates were sent during the event, perhapsreflecting the haste with which this debate had been rescheduled.Figure 1 illustrates the frequency with which tweets mentioning the six leaders were sent during thefirst debate. As can be seen, throughout the 90 minutes Twitter traffic was very much dominated bycomments about Sturgeon and Davidson, particularly when the pair exchanged blows over theprospects of a second Scottish independence referendum (‘indyref2’) and when Sturgeon brandisheda 4-page Tory campaign leaflet that reportedly contained 26 uses of the word independence.7/7/2017 Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings | British Politics and Policy at LSEhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/scottish-leaders-debates-on-twitter-sturgeon-davidson-and-indyref2-dominated-proceedings/ 2/5As Figure 1 also shows, Harvie and Dugdale only had a significant impact on the Twitter conversationon one occasion each: when Harvie discussed inequality, describing successive Westminstergovernments’ corporation tax policies as “a race to the bottom”; and when Dugdale accused Sturgeonof telling “a porky” regarding the education gap between Scotland’s “richest and poorest kids”. Rennieand Coburn, meanwhile, made little impact on Twitter; nor did the two prime ministerial candidates,Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn, who were rarely mentioned by Twitter users during the debate.Figure 2 illustrates the extent to which the Scottish leaders (and the UK leaders) were mentioned onTwitter during the 90-minute STV debate. Here, the Twitter audience appeared to be stimulated mostby the middle section of the programme, where the four participating politicians were allowed tocross-examine each other. This suggests that this type of feature resonates more with the Twitteraudience at home, allowing for more focussed, probing and repeated questioning of politicians.7/7/2017 Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings | British Politics and Policy at LSEhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/scottish-leaders-debates-on-twitter-sturgeon-davidson-and-indyref2-dominated-proceedings/ 3/5As can be seen, the three female Scottish leaders – Sturgeon, Davidson and Dugdale – featuredprominently on Twitter during this section of the debate, in which gendered issues including the childtax credit ‘rape clause’ and ‘WASPI women’ (i.e. Women Against State Pension Inequality) were tothe fore, and where the subject of Scottish independence was also discussed heatedly. Despite beingmentioned regularly by the four panellists and the audience, May and Corbyn were again largelyignored by Twitter users. Indeed, Patrick Harvie, who of course was excluded from the STV debate,tended to feature just as frequently in Twitter discussions.The research team has also conducted some preliminary sentiment analysis of the tweets sent duringthe second debate. As Figure 3 shows, Sturgeon received the most positive response of the night onTwitter, when she attacked the Labour Party’s social policies. Yet, the cross-examination section ofthe debate saw a huge drop in sentiment from positive to negative in those tweets mentioningSturgeon, when she was being pressed on indyref2 and on the SNP Scottish Government’s 10-yearrecord. Similarly, the Twitter discussion of Davidson took a very negative turn during the debatearound the rape clause.7/7/2017 Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings | British Politics and Policy at LSEhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/scottish-leaders-debates-on-twitter-sturgeon-davidson-and-indyref2-dominated-proceedings/ 4/5Throughout both debates, then, Twitter conversations paid little attention to the candidates for No.10.Instead, the focus was very much on the participating Scottish leaders (particularly the three women),and often on devolved rather than reserved policy issues.Although Brexit was discussed on Twitter during the first half of the BBC debate, it featured rarelyduring the STV event. The prospects of an indyref2, however, figured prominently throughout bothdebates. And while Sturgeon tended to dominate Twitter discussion as she tried to steer the debatesaway from independence and towards other issues such as Brexit, Davidson, in particular, tended tomake most impact on Twitter when attacking Sturgeon and the SNP on their plans for a secondreferendum.Indeed, the election results from Scotland would appear to suggest that Ruth Davidson’s approachgained considerable traction, not only on Twitter during the televised debates, but also throughout thewider campaign discourse. The loss of 21 SNP seats (12 to the Conservatives, including those ofpolitical heavyweights such as Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson) and a 13.1% drop in the share ofthe overall vote, led the Deputy First Minister John Swinney to acknowledge that the question of anindyref2 “was a significant motivator of votes against the SNP”. Davidson herself immediatelyproclaimed that “indyref2 is dead”. It remains to be seen whether plans for a second independencereferendum are dead, mortally wounded, or have simply received a temporary setback._______About the Authors Graeme Baxter a Research Fellow specialising in Information Management at RobertGordon University.  7/7/2017 Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings | British Politics and Policy at LSEhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/scottish-leaders-debates-on-twitter-sturgeon-davidson-and-indyref2-dominated-proceedings/ 5/5June 24th, 2017 | British and Irish Politics and Policy, Featured, GE2017, Scottish IndependenceReferendum | 1 CommentSimon Burnett is a Professor specialising in Information Management at RobertGordon University.  John Isaacs is Lecturer in Computing at Robert Gordon University. Iain MacLeod is Lecturer in Strategy and Policy at Robert Gordon University.  Sarah Pedersen is a Professor of Communication and Media at Robert GordonUniversity.  Elizabeth Tait is a Senior Lecturer in Information Management at Robert GordonUniversity.  This work by British Politics and Policy at LSE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.

Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings

http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83310/1/A%20year%20since%20the%20UK%20voted%20to%20take%20back%20control%20%E2%80%93%20but%20control%20of%20what_%20_%20British%20Politics%20and%20Policy%20at%20LSE.pdf

Scottish leaders’ debates on Twitter: Sturgeon, Davidson, and ‘indyref2’ dominated proceedings

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSE Research Online