With its fast-growing population Karachi is typical of many South Asian megacities that struggle to meet the needs of low income citizens. The eminent Pakistani architect Arif Hasan has been involved in urban development for over 40 years. Here he talks to Mukti Jain Campion about his home city’s post-Partition evolution

Campion, Mukti Jain

Hasan, Arif

LSE Research Online

2016-12-13“If you look at Karachi and who plans it, the decisions aremade by those who do not understand the problems of theordinary people” – Arif Hasanblogs.lse.ac.uk /southasia/2016/12/13/if-you-look-at-karachi-and-who-plans-it-the-decisions-are-made-by-those-who-do-not-understand-the-problems-of-the-ordinary-people-arif-hasan/With its fast-growing population Karachi is typical of many South Asian megacities that struggle to meetthe needs of low income citizens. The eminent Pakistani architect Arif Hasan has been involved inurban development for over 40 years. Here he talks to Mukti Jain Campion about his home city’spost-Partition evolution.MJC: Can you describe what happened to Karachi at Partition?AH: Before Partition Karachi was a Hindu-majority city and a Sindhi-speaking city.  The architectureof the old quarters of Karachi resembled old Bombay, a port city with which it shared many similarities of culture,languages and food. But Karachi’s demography underwent huge change in 1947. Within a few months of Partition,80,000 people arrived from Delhi, including me. That was the beginning of an exodus from India which continueduntil around 1955 adding over half a million people to the city’s population. By the time the first wave of refugees hadsettled in, Karachi had become a predominantly Muslim city and more than half of its population was Urdu-speaking. Very few cities in the world have undergone such a rapid change.At the time of Partition Karachi was capital of Sindh, but it became capital of Pakistan and the capital of Sindh waspushed out to Hyderabad. That was when the link between this Sindhi-speaking city and its hinterland was broken.Many of Karachi’s ethnic problems are related to this fact. Today Karachi is the capital of a Sindhi-speaking provincebut Sindhi is not the main language.We’ve had major increases in population ever since. After Partition the next wave came with industrialisation in thelate 1950s when huge building projects were implemented and Pashtun labour was brought from what was thenNorth West Frontier Province and from what we call Azad (Free) Kashmir. This started a chain of major migrationfrom those areas. However this migration was not resented.Was there housing and other provision made for the expanding population at that time?Remarkably, the federal and provincial governments were able to accommodate this quadrupling of Karachi’spopulation. They were able to supply water, lay plots where people could live, begin a transport system and extendthe electricity lines.Karachi is not an unplanned city. It has unplanned areas and extensions. The first planning was done by theSwedish firm MRV and to this day the inner structure of the post-colonial city follows their plan. But the plan was notfully implemented.1/5Image: Arif Hasan speaking at LSE. Credit: Tim AldcroftThe university was being constructed next to the planned federal capital area and in 1953 there were student riots inwhich the refugee population took part and they were able to topple three governments in one year. This sparked awhole debate around whether Karachi should be capital of Pakistan given the violent nature of its politics. ThenGeneral Ayub Khan came to power and he took the decision that the capital should shift from Karachi and theworking class population (including the refugees) should be housed in two satellite towns about 20km outsideKarachi so they would create no further problems.This plan was conceived by C.A. Doxiadis the renowned Greek urban planner who went on to design the newcapital, Islamabad. An essential part of his vision was that there would be industries in these two new towns whichwould offer employment, but the industries didn’t develop fast enough so the “barbarians” kept coming back to thecity to work. This marked the beginning of Karachi’s transport problems. It also changed a multi-class, multi-ethniccity into an ethnically-segregated and class-segregated city. A lot of Karachi’s ethnic problems and conflicts wereborn from Doxiadis’s plan.You went to England to study architecture at Oxford Polytechnic and then trained inpractices in Europe. What was Karachi like when you returned in 1967?The Karachi I found in 1967 was living on colonial kinetic energy. It was governed bya brown colonial elite who werethe custodians of that culture. Like most port towns it had bars, billiard rooms, many cinemas, and a fairly vibrantfolk culture which was a product of the city itself. A lot of multi-class space was available at that time in the citycentre. There were no traffic jams, a reasonable public transport system including a tramway that linked theimportant parts of the city.But the city was divided and underneath all of that you had the political assertion of a populist culture emerging inprotest against the brown-skinned remnants of colonial rule. There was anger against the alcohol shops, thenightclubs, and against what was conceived as obscenity on television. So that was very much there in thevernacular press and Bhutto cashed in on it. That was the Karachi I found on my return.How did your career in Karachi develop?My work as an architect in Karachi was initially for rich people. I think I made the homes for the richest people at that2/5time. I also worked for developers. But a few things upset me.There was one case in 1974 relating to people I had known as a child, because we had lived in an area whererefugees had settled and rich and poor were all mixed up. Their homes were to be bulldozed for an infrastructureproject. They were not told why. They had been promised they would be given land nearby but did not materialise.I had an important client who was a very high government official. I told him what was happening and he said: “Oh,these people they are vagabonds, their women are prostitutes. They just cause harm to the city”. I was shockedbecause I had known these people since they were kids. So the settlement was bulldozed and they were packed offto a remote desolate area in the hills north of Karachi. I helped them with whatever advice I could give with buildingtheir homes there. It was the beginning of my understanding of land issues and of what housing was all about. Myvery conservative Oxford education hadn’t prepared me for any of this.You are known for social empowerment and sustainable approaches to urban development,how did that come about?That also is related to a number of things that happened around the same time. I used to travel up and down theIndus in a boat, belonging to Mohanas who are fishermen and load carriers. I got to know them well. Then I heardthey were going to be removed to the other side of the river where the fish were not available in same numbers. So Idid some drawings and I wrote a letter for them to argue their case. They took it to their Member of NationalAssembly who asked them “Who did this for you?”I was summoned to see him and he asked me: “Why are you spoiling these people?” We had a conversation and hebecame very sympathetic; I don’t know if it was our conversation but the fishermen were able to remain on theirland.A few things like this happened. One of the first articles I wrote said an architect has to deal with these thingsbecause there are people who can benefit from such advice. The article was read by the chairperson of theAppropriate Technology Development Authority and he invited me to join as a consultant.  We travelled all overPakistan and I would say that he was my mentor because from him that I learnt the relationship between humanbeings and technology.That was my first education in dealing with communities and led to the pledge I made in 1983:“I will not do projects that will irreparably damage the ecology and environment of the area in whichthey are located. I will not do projects that increase poverty, dislocate people and destroy the tangibleand intangible cultural heritage of communities that live in the city. I will not do projects that destroymulti-class space and violate building by-laws and zoning regulations. And I will always object toinsensitive projects that do all this, provided I can offer viable alternatives.” I have tried to keep my pledge over my career since.Can you describe an example of your approach to self-empowerment?In 1981 I was invited to work with Akhtar Ahmeed Khan, the very famous South Asian social scientist, on the OrangiPilot Project.  Orangi was an unofficial settlement on the northern fringe of Karachi, which was not that big at thattime. It was very near a large government development which is empty to this day whereas Orangi has prosperedand developed.3/5I worked with Akhtar Ahmeed Khan from 1981 until the time he died in 1999. My work was to develop a sanitationmodel which could incorporate his concept of self-help. In the settlement there were lanes of 20-40 houses. Youwent there and said if you want sanitation, these are the benefits of our approach. So if you can elect, select ornominate a leader for the lane, he can come and apply to us for help but you all have to be a part of this.We would work out the estimates in labour and materials, we gave them a plan with calculated levels and providetechnical teams who supervised the work. They collected the money, we never touched their money at all. Thecitizen groups had constant quarrels amongst themselves and we didn’t interfere. The project was very successfuland we had literally thousands of applications. We couldn’t deal with them all so we began a training programme ofmasons who could build the sanitation system and the people could approach them directly. It became a very bigmovement and as a result, out of the 108,000 houses, approximately 105,000 have a sanitation system.Orangi made me understand many things. In particular that we will never be able to provide homes for our people. Itis simply not possible, given the rate of growth. It is not a matter of resources. Even if we had the resources, wecould not do it. Firstly it would require a very different planning approach with architects and engineers trained towork to lower standards. Secondly there is the land issue. If you look at Karachi and who plans it, the decision-making is done by people who do not understand the problems of the ordinary people. The government plannerswho have worked in informal settlements do understand – but they are not the decision-makers.Over the decades that you have been working in Karachi have you seen this understandingimprove?The understanding has improved but other things have since happened. Neo-liberalism has captured academia,planning and politics. The new mantra became: “It’s not the business of the state to do business” so the distancebetween state and people increased substantially. The new focus on direct foreign investment means projects havereplaced planning.Do you think Karachi can still improve living conditions for its citizens?Certain parts of Karachi have already improved for its citizens but for the majority of the city’s population, theconditions have certainly not improved. Transport, housing, the general environment, health, they have notimproved. They have deteriorated. In percentage terms you can say we have done wonderfully but if you look at realfigures we have not done well.But you have a younger generation and the social indicators in the current 15-24 group in Karachi have improvedenormously. That is change that is bound to happen when a city expands as a result of new ideas, the media and soon. Just to give you two figures: in the 1961 Census 63% of women in this age group were married and 38% men. Ifyou extrapolate the 1998 Census figures to 2006 then 17% women in this age group are married and 8% men. It’sthe first time in history of Karachi we have an overwhelming majority of unmarried adolescents whose literacypercentage is in the 80s.This is a very big difference from the previous generation, but at the moment I think they are too scared to bedemanding because the city has had a rough time with targeted killings and bomb blasts, so there is fear. Thefigures I’ve given you have changed gender relations and family structures and with these two changes there isbound to be a systematic organised demand, I think it’s just a matter of one more generation.How do you feel about the changes that have taken place to Karachi’s architecture over yourlifetime?I am not a conservationist but I am afraid that we will cause enormous harm to our built heritage if we are not able to4/5rein in the greed and power of developers. I sit on the Sindh Heritage Committee and I see the power they have andI think this power should not lie with developers, it should lie with the state. Everything that happened in theAmerican Wild West in the rush for gold, is now happening for land.Arif Hasan spoke at a joint South Asia Centre/ LSE Cities event on Urbanisation Trends in Karachi in November.Listen to the podcast here.The first LSE Pakistan Summit ‘Pakistan @ 70’ will take place in Karachi on 10-11 April 2017. Read more about thepanels here. Registration details will also be posted on the event page in the new year.Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the South Asia @ LSE blog, nor of the LondonSchool of Economics. Please read ourcomments policy before posting.About the AuthorsArif Hasan is a practising Pakistani architect-planner, writer, teacher and activist working in Karachi.Mukti Jain Campion is a radio producer and Founder of Culture Wise, an independent company which producesdocumentaries for BBC Radio.Copyright © 2016 London School of Economics5/5

“If you look at Karachi and who plans it, the decisions are made by those who do not understand the problems of the ordinary people” – Arif Hasan

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSE Research Online