The 1960s and 1970s saw a significant decline in national average SAT achievement scores in America. Since that time, successive governments have tried to implement public school reforms, the latest iteration of which is the Common Core policy, which applies consistent national standards. William Jeynes argues that the Common Core policy lowers educational standards and has also had a disappointing effect on test results. He argues in order to improve educational outcomes, rather than increasing moves towards educational standardization, policymakers should encourage greater competition between public and private schools through improved school choice

Jeynes, William

LSE Research Online

blogs.lse.ac.ukhttp://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/12/04/moves-towards-greater-educational-standardization-epitomized-by-common-core-have-done-little-to-address-the-decline-of-american-education/Moves towards greater educational standardization epitomizedby Common Core have done little to address the decline ofAmerican education.The 1960s and 1970s saw a significant decline in national average SAT achievement scores inAmerica. Since that time, successive governments have tried to implement public school reforms,the latest iteration of which is the Common Core policy, which applies consistent nationalstandards. William Jeynes argues that the Common Core policy lowers educational standardsand has also had a disappointing effect on test results. He argues in order to improve educationaloutcomes, rather than increasing moves towards educational standardization, policymakersshould encourage greater competition between public and private schools through improvedschool choice. It is undeniable that there is a strong positive relationship between educational outcomes and economicprosperity. There is also an understanding that such an association, although less explicit, also exists betweeneducational quality and a nation’s political power. With this acknowledgement in mind, the United States has beentrying to reinvent its public schooling system ever since the humiliating plummet in its national average of SAT(Scholastic Achievement Test) scores for seventeen consecutive years from 1963 to 1980. The most recentattempt is by instituting yet another government initiated reform called Common Core, which seeks to applyconsistent national standards in math, language and literature, for K-12 students. The question is, does it work?The question of whether Common Core will work is especially salient, because economists, sociologists, andeducators more than ever before acknowledge the almost inextricable relationship between the quality of anation’s education system and its economic prowess. I argue that the introduction of Common Core isnot asolution to America’s educational woes given its disappointing impact on test results, an associated increase in theracial achievement gap and its general lowering of standards. We should instead be encouraging greatercompetition between public and private schools via school choice.The rise and decline of American education  The United States, and prior to that Great Britain, used to be the exemplar to the world about how to run a systemof public schools. During the first sixty plus years of the twentieth century, the U.S. Department of Educationpublished books, reports, and other documents that were in demand over most of the world, regarding how to runan elementary and secondary school system. To be sure, during the period from the 1630s to the early 1960s,there was much to emulate in the US schooling system. The education-oriented Puritans put an immenseemphasis on literacy. The primary reason for such an emphasis was so that people could read the Bible. In theminds of the Puritans, the ability to read the Bible was not a prerequisite for salvation, but it sure helped. In 1635the Puritans established the first secondary school in North America, Boston Latin School, and in 1636 foundedHarvard in the town of Cambridge, in honor of the university where so many of their leaders had been educated.This emphasis on literacy contributed significantly to New England having the highest literacy rate in the world forthree centuries. For example, according to the 1840 census Connecticut had a literacy rate of 99.7 percent.For a long period of time, it appeared that the United States’ schooling paradigm had much to emulate. Therewere high literacy rates, the highest rate of students going to college, and a vigorous university system thatattracted some of the finest minds in the world. One of the most unique features of the American educationallandscape, particularly from 1865-1960 was that the nation benefitted from having both strong private and publicsectors in education. To be sure, at both the university level and the K-12 level, America’s best institutions wereprivate ones. Nearly all of the Ivy League universities had been founded by church denominations and the samewas true of the nation’s private schools. Nevertheless, at the university level, the University of Virginia, theUniversity of Michigan, and the University of Wisconsin were among those that had a considerable amount ofrespect throughout the late 1800s into the present era.As Figure 1 illustrates, from 1963, American education began signs of faltering. Average SAT scores declined for17 consecutive years, when in the entire near-forty year history of the test, scores had never declined in even twoconsecutive years. In 2012 Verbal SAT scores hit another all-time low. Statistical analysis of the decline indicatesthat about 62 percent of the decline is due to real academic change and 38 percent is due to changingdemographics. In various reports by the Educational Testing Service, the makers of the SAT, factors such as lackof self-discipline, a departure from the Protestant/Christian ethic, and changes in family- structure and -involvement were presented as the primary reasons for the decline.Figure 1- Decline in average SAT scores from 1963-1980 Note: 1963 average SAT score indexed to 1000 The role of Common Core To the extent that these three factors contributed to its decline, will the Common Core curriculum revitalizeAmerican education? This question is especially worthy of consideration because most leaders in religious privateeducation emphasize the salience of self-discipline, the Christian ethic, and the family in maximizing academicoutcomes. It is therefore no surprise that even though private schools represent only 9 percent of the US schoolpopulation, they produce about 50 percent of the National Merit Scholarship winners each year.Unlike the US university situation in which the private and public secular have a healthy level of competition witheach other’s, and the system thrives, at the K-12 level public schools have a virtual monopoly. It therefore comesas no surprise that K-12 public schools, in contrast to the universities, produce sub-mediocre results. Is CommonCore the answer or is more competition that includes private schools, as well as applying readily applicableprinciples recognized by private schools, the solution? A closer look at the results of the implementation ofCommon Core can provide some guidance.If one visits schools in the United States these days, Common Core standards are discussed with teemingregularity. However, now that Americans are being exposed to a plethora of information about Common Core,support among the nation’s citizenry is drooping precipitously. A recent Rasmussen poll indicates that support forCommon Core among parents with school children has plummeted from 52 percent in November 2013 to 34percent now. Three reasons why that support has dropped relate to the question of whether Common Core cansolve America’s educational woes.First, the test results from Common Core have thus far been very disappointing. The most significant example isNew York, one of the first states to implement the Common Core standards. The state has reported a significantdrop in average test scores. This is particularly true for African American students and youth with learningdisabilities. The percentage of 3rd grade African American students who scored “below standard” in EnglishLanguage Arts increased from 15.5 percent before the Common Core standards were implemented to a stunning50 percent afterward. For the 7th grade math test, 16.5 percent of African American students scored “belowstandard” before implementation compared with 70 percent afterward. Scores of those with learning disabilitiesalso plunged so that 75 percent of 5th grade students in this category scored “below standard” in EnglishLanguage Arts.Second, the racial achievement gap has swelled under Common Core. In New York there was a 69 percentincrease in the achievement gap between white- versus African American- students in English Language Arts testresults. Among eighth grade Latino students, the achievement gap after Common Core was implementedincreased over 7 times. For math achievement, the white- and African American- achievement gap surged 52percent. The recent widening of the achievement gap reverses a trend of the gap either narrowing or remainingstable, over the last thirty-five years. The golden age of the gap’s reduction occurred 1) in the late 1970s in partbecause the achievement scores of white students slumped and 2) in the early 1980s when President Reaganinsisted that teachers introduce urban children of color to more demanding material. The achievement gap hasremained relatively stable since then, but in New York these early test results suggest that Common Core couldundo all of the progress that has been made over thirty-five years.Third, Common Core likely lowers standards rather than raises them. For example, although most peopleassociate Algebra I with the 8th grade, under Common Core the expectations are that this course for moststudents will be pushed back to the 9th grade. This is an especially significant development, because it means thatthe majority of students will not take calculus in high school, which will make them unprepared for admittance tothe nation’s most selective colleges. In addition, the Common Core standards call for a reduction in the reading ofthe classics such as A Tale of Two Cities, Pride & Prejudice, War & Peace, Hamlet, Romeo & Juliet, and theBrothers Karamazov. Instead, the Common Core emphasizes non-fictional books that are practical for theworkplace. There is certainly room for this type of practical emphasis, but most would assert that it should not bedone at the expense of learning some of life’s truths through the classics of literature.In addition to these concerns is the reality that under Presidents Clinton, G.W. Bush, and Obama there have beena series of attempts to make schooling more standardized and to increase a reliance on testing. These actionshave been taken with the best of intentions and with the specific goals in mind of raising achievement andreducing the achievement gap. President George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind was the most recent of theseattempts. Each of these efforts yielded at best unchanged SAT score results and only minimal improvement in theachievement gap. Common Core might best be called No Child Left Behind on steroids in terms of its approach totesting and standardization and the results thus far have not been encouraging. Greater school choice as a solution The move toward greater standardization and testing in the United States, that is most recently epitomized in theCommon Core simply have not worked. It is time for the United States to adapt a different strategy to improving oneducation outcomes that focuses on strategies that are more consistent with the values and priorities that madeits education system great between 1630 and 1963. To the degree that self-discipline, religious values, and anemphasis on family appear to be highly related to academic achievement in the United States, it would seem thatencouraging a higher degree of competition between private and public schools via school choice would be a wiseexperiment. Such competition would not only increase the number of students attending private schools, but wouldlikely cause public schools to learn from private schools and practice more of the values associated with higherscholastic outcomes. Let the competition begin.Featured image credit: Ben W (Flickr, CC-BY-NC-2.0)Please read our comments policy before commenting.Note:  This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of USApp– American Politics and Policy, norof the London School of Economics. Shortened URL for this post:  http://bit.ly/1pXFWyj_________________________________________ About the authorWilliam Jeynes – California State University, Long BeachWilliam Jeynes is a Professor of Education at California State University, Long Beach. Hisresearch interests cover a wide range of issues that include education, psychology, economics,history, religion, and sociology. His multidisciplinary approach has helped enable him to developspecial relationships with the US and Korean governments. He has done a considerable amountof quantitative and qualitative research on how to bridge the achievement gap, parentalinvolvement, religious commitment, historical trends, school choice, family structure, religiousschools, discrimination, bullying, reading instruction, and public policy. He has written for theWhite House and for both the G.W. Bush and Obama administrations.CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 2014 LSE USAPP

Moves towards greater educational standardization epitomized by Common Core have done little to address the decline of American education

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSE Research Online