Anne Burns has been researching current norms of social media sharing, particularly in relation to photo sharing practices, and reflects here on the implications this research might have for social media research in years to come. Whilst there are many opportunities for researchers, more reflection is needed on the potential for harm that can be caused by the unauthorized reproduction of data

Burns, Anne

LSE Research Online

6/10/2015‘Picturing the Social’: Questions of method, ethics andtransparency in the analysis of social media photography.blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/06/10/picturing-the-social-method-ethics-social-media/Anne Burns has been researching current norms of social media sharing, particularly in relation tophoto sharing practices, and reflects here on the implications this research might have for socialmedia research in years to come. Whilst there are many opportunities for researchers, more reflectionis needed on the potential for harm that can be caused by the unauthorized reproduction of data.Over 1.8 billion photographs are uploaded and shared each day. This amount of potential data can beoverwhelming for researchers – how does one start? Where are the boundaries to be placed? Howmuch data is enough? And what kinds of method should be used? These concerns can cause two types ofproblems. Firstly, the quantity of images produced each day prompts an understandable focus on managing andanalyzing volume. Secondly, a large-scale approach can tend towards producing generalizations, in terms of keythemes and demographics. An example of this approach is Selfiecity, a project led by Lev Manovich in which morethan 600 000 images were downloaded from Instagram, and reduced to 3200 key selfies. Using images that weretaken in five major cities around the world, this investigation of global self-portrait style sorted the data according tofactors such as gender, head cant and expression. As Losh (2015) notes, this approach to images tends to atomisedata and strip it of its contextual meaning. Furthermore, Losh also questions the project’s use of casual labour onAmazon’s Mechanical Turk, in order to tag and sort selfies. Selfiecity therefore serves as an example of some of thepossible limitations of large-scale forms of image analysis.1/5Eye drawn onto a dirty bus shelter, Sheffield. Photo: Anne BurnsIn contrast, the ‘Picturing the Social’ project – part of the Visual Social Media Lab, based at the University ofSheffield – consists of several studies that employ a combination of methods for studying social media photography.For example, one of these studies, ‘Imaging Sheffield’, uses an ethnographic approach in order to consider howsharing and looking at photographs online contribute to a sense of place and belonging. Other ‘Picturing the Social’studies take a broader view than this micro approach, such as Mike Thelwall’s analysis of images on Twitter, whichuses a random sample of 400 images to analyse factors such as the type and content of images shared on theplatform. Both of these approaches to social media photography will yield valuable insights into the expectations andaffordances of online sharing, so it is therefore not a question of qualitative versus quantitative, but rather a matterof offsetting potential limitations by using a range of methods.To demonstrate the particular relevance of small-scale, ethnographic approaches to ‘Big Data’, I would use theexample of my PhD research, which examined the disciplinary effects of certain types of social media discourse. Inparticular, I considered how the negative messages circulated online regarding women’s use of photography – suchas selfies – act to reinforce gender stereotypes and social inequalities. Having seen that the evaluation of others’photographic practices is far from neutral, I was keen to avoid inadvertently reproducing problematic stereotypeswhen undertaking this new research project. As such, the ethnographic approach used in ‘Imaging Sheffield’ is veryappropriate, as it demands that I situate myself alongside my participants, rather than determine what theirbehaviours ‘mean’ from a distance. Importantly, ethnography considers the opinions of its subjects, as summarizedby Boellstorff et al.: “We conduct research not just to mine data from informants, but to learn about their theoreticaland pragmatic insights” (Boellstorff et. al, 2012: 16). The large-scale approach taken by Selfiecity could not accessthese kinds of user perspectives, and therefore misses out on arguably some of the most interesting and useful data2/5relating to contemporary social media practice.Sheffield Forgemasters. Photo: Anne Burns.In order to obtain these kinds of insight, ‘Imaging Sheffield’ considers the practices of three categories of user, all ofwhom share images of Sheffield online, namely: groups, individuals and organisations. ‘Groups’ include Facebookgroups dedicated to sharing images of Sheffield, as well as Sheffield-based camera clubs who have a largepresence online. The ‘Individual’ category comprises those who post images of Sheffield to sites such as Flickr, orwho curate Sheffield-themed boards on Pinterest. Lastly, ‘Organisations’ include the University of Sheffield and itsInstagram account, and the local studies archive Picture Sheffield. This category is important for exploring some ofthe ways in which sharing is used as part of a wider strategy, either in terms of company branding, or as part of thecouncil’s provision of local information services.The aim of this study is to explore how sharing practices differ within and between these three categories, and toestablish what the current norms of sharing include and how they develop. How, for instance, does a subject decidewhether to post in a group or as an individual on Flickr? What different affordances, and types of sociality, areoffered by each context? And what other activities – such as discussions and meet-ups – take place in relation tophotographic sharing? A key component of this study will be participant observation, in which I will take part in thepractices I am studying, by taking and sharing photographs of Sheffield.Whilst working on the Imaging Sheffield study, I have found it useful to work through the process of how to conductresearch by writing a weekly blog post – @annelburns on Medium – addressing topics such as ethics and the use ofethnographic methods in visual research. Principally, I wanted to make the processing of designing a study, and3/5generally working things out, to be transparent, and to show some of my reasoning behind certain approaches. Thisis one of the study’s strengths, as it challenges the conventional model for research, as emerging fully-formed, withfindings being presented at the project’s conclusion, and with decision-making either opaque or obscured entirely. Incontrast, I wish to show my thinking at every stage of the process, and argue for the validity of each step taken.Children’s drawings, Sheffield. Photo: Anne Burns.In one post, I discuss how my PhD topic influenced my ethical approach to social media research. One aspect of mywork looked at the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, sometimes called ‘revenge porn’ or involuntarypornography. Victims were frequently chastised for taking sexualized images, as that was perceived to be thespecific act that made their private lives public, rather than their aggressors’ actions. Additionally, the feministprinciple of ‘choice’ was commonly deployed to assign blame, in that women were accused of making bad choices,or having effectively chosen their own abuse. Such an explicit instance of the politics of data management isundoubtedly extreme, but I began to see uncomfortable parallels with the research practices of other academics.Too often, I see the argument that once material is perceived to be public, then it is fair game for research use. Butas the AoIR report (2012) concerning research ethics warns us, private is not a straightforward concept, and neitheris the potential for harm that can be caused by the unauthorized reproduction of data.These questions of method, ethics and transparency are of central importance to the emerging field of social mediaresearch, and as such form some of the key points of interest for the ‘Picturing the Social’ project. Hopefully, thisstudy will also provide a useful guide for other social media researchers who are working through similar issues.Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of the Impact of Social Science blog, nor of theLondon School of Economics. Please review our Comments Policy if you have any concerns on posting a commentbelow.About the Author4/5Anne Burns is a Research Associate at the University of Sheffield’s Visual Social Media lab, and is conducting anethnography for the Picturing the Social project, that will explore the practices and forms of social mediaphotography. Anne writes a weekly research blog, through which she will be sharing some of the findings from theethnography. This can be found here. Anne has recently obtained her PhD from the Loughborough UniversitySchool of Art. Her PhD focused on a connection between the discussion of women’s photographic practices andsocial discipline. Principally, Anne analysed how the devaluing of certain types of photograph (such as selfies) orbehaviour (such as the pouting ‘duckface’) within popular discourse is used to classify and marginalize women. HerPhD blog, which discusses photography, social media and feminism, can be found here. Copyright © The Author (or The Authors) - Unless otherwise stated, this work is licensed under a CreativeCommons Attribution Unported 3.0 License.5/5

‘Picturing the Social’: Questions of method, ethics and transparency in the analysis of social media photography.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

LSE Research Online