Gear, S.

Harris, M.P.

Heubeck, M.

NERC Open Research Archive

291Scottish Birds:  291–302Scottish Birds Records Committee report on rare birds in Scotland, 201134:4 (2014)A photographic resurvey ofseabird colonies on Foula,ShetlandM. Heubeck, S. Gear & M.P. HarrisIn 1974, the Nature Conservancy Council commissioned the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE)to design a monitoring scheme suitable for detecting changes in seabird colonies in Shetland. Aspart of this work MPH and others made extensive counts at different seabird colonies in June andJuly 1974, while MPH also took hundreds of black-and-white images using a Mamiya PressCamera fitted with a 150 mm lens, with the intention of establishing a reference baseline (Harris1976). The island of Foula was visited on 1–3 July and MPH and Laughton Johnston counted theseabirds and took an extensive set of photographs mainly along the west and north coasts, fromland and during a circumnavigation on 3 July.The 2½ inch square negatives and 9 x 12 cmprints from 1974 were subsequently stored inShetland by MH, who in May 2014 sent the Foulaprints to SG to see if the photographs could bereplicated, 40 years later. This was achieved on 21June (from the sea) and 1 July 2014 (from land)using a Nikon Coolpix P600. Here we discusssome of the changes that are evident for thosespecies visible in the photographs (Gannet Morusbassanus, Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis,Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, Guillemot Uria aalgeand Razorbill Alca torda) in the context of thefour censuses of Foula’s cliff-nesting seabirdsthat have been made since 1974 (Table 1): in1976 and 1987 (Furness 1981, 1987), and byScottish Natural Heritage in 2000 and 2007(Harvey et al. 2000, SNH unpubl.)Plate 277. Foula’s north coast showing the North Bank, 220 m, rising to the Kame, far right, 376 m. August 2014. © S. GearFigure 1. Map of Foula, Shetland, showing locationsmentioned in the text and captions.1 kmWest GaadBlobrickSoberieHol o da ScrudhurdinsHaa o da ScrudhurdinsKameWester HoevdiDa Floorof Gamlin Da SmaalieSkirnawilseFOULAScottish Birds:  291–302292A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, ShetlandGannets were first recorded settling on the cliffs of Foula in 1970, nest building began in 1975,breeding was confirmed in 1980 on a large rock shelf at the foot of the Kame, and Furness (1981a)commented that there was room for expansion to several hundred pairs in this area, but at theexpense of nesting Fulmars Fulmarus glacialis and Guillemots. Breeding numbers increased to1,370 apparently occupied nests (AON) by 2007, and while it is clear that many of the ledgesGannets now nest on were occupied by Guillemots in 1974, many other former Guillemot ledgesnearby were bare in 2014 (Plate 279). So, while Gannets may have evicted Guillemots from certainledges, their role in any decline of the latter has probably been minimal.34:4 (2014)Table 1. Census counts of five species of cliff-nesting seabirds on Foula, 1974–2007. AON = apparently occupiednest. 1974: 1–3 July, two persons, single count from cliff-tops, one circumnavigation (Harris 1976). 1976: 15 June to5 July, mainly one person, all accessible boulder beaches visited, three circumnavigations (Furness 1981b). 1987: 26May to 3 July, seven persons, all accessible boulder beaches visited, one circumnavigation (Furness 1987). 2000:mainly 3–10 June, eight persons, all accessible boulder beaches visited, one circumnavigation (Harvey et al. 2000).2007: 1–7 June, eight persons, some accessible boulders beaches visited, one circumnavigation (SNH unpublished).*Coverage excluded some boulders fields where 1,171 Shag AON and 896 Guillemot and 495 Razorbill individuals were counted/estimated in 2000.Species (count unit) 1974 1976 1987 2000 2007Gannet (AON) 0 3 124 723 1,370Shag (AON) abundant 3,357 2,396 2,277 258*Kittiwake (AON) 3,853+ 5,570 4,331 1,982 911Guillemot (individuals) 33–37,000 60,021 34,472 41,435 24,799*Razorbill (individuals) 1,720 10,373 6,170 2,121 559*Plate 278. Guillemots at Skirnawilse, Foula, Shetland, showing occupation of both the open ledge and boulders, July2012. © S. Gear293Scottish Birds:  291–302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 279 a–b. Cliff face on the north side of Wester Hoevdi, west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21 June2014. © M.P. Harris/S. GearIn the Seabird Colony Register and Seabird 2000 censuses, Foula held the largest Shag colony inBritain and Ireland (Wanless & Harris 2004). In 1995, the island was declared a Special ProtectionArea under the EU Birds Directive, with Shag being a qualifying species, and with Foula holdingat least 1.9% of the breeding North European population in 1987 (http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1896). In 1976, it was estimated that 94% of nests were in boulder fields (mostly along the westcoast), 5% were on broad ledges, and 1% on tops of stacks (Furness 1981b). The 1987 census countwas 29% lower than in 1976 (Table 1), with a 17% reduction in numbers in the four recordingareas holding the main west coast boulder field colonies (2,360 AON in 1976) and a 56% reductionin the other six recording areas in which the species bred elsewhere around the island (997 AONin 1976). The 2000 census total was only 119 nests lower than in 1987. In 2004, Shags largelydeserted Foula during the breeding season (Mavor et al. 2005), very few adults were present in2005, and the 2007 nest count was 80–90% lower than in 2000 (Table 1). There has been nowhole-island census since 2007, but numbers in breeding success plots on the east coast remainlow (Heubeck et al. in prep.), only 284 adult Shags were counted from the sea around the islandon 19 May 2014 (37 on the west coast, 247 on the east coast), and the photographs confirm thevirtual absence of Shags from the west coast boulder fields in late June 2014. The photographsalso show remarkable physical changes in the habitat, with the height above sea level of someboulder beaches having been reduced since 1974, presumably by wave action and rendering thehabitat more vulnerable to inundation during summer storms (Plate 280). Other boulder fieldshave been considerably rearranged, whether by the sea or by rock falls from above (Plate 281),while some have remained unchanged (Plate 282; 604 Shag AON were counted among bouldersand 261 AON on grassy slopes in this general area in June 2000).The decline in Kittiwake numbers on Foula has been well documented, both by the census counts(Table 1) and by annual counts from the sea made by SG since 2002 (latest count: 361 AON on 7June 2014). Although the 2014 photographs reveal some rock falls that have occurred since 1974,they mostly show deserted, unaltered cliff faces (Plates 280 & 283).Scottish Birds:  291–302294A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 280 a–b. Boulder beach at Kittiwakes Haa o da Scrudhurdins, west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and21 June 2014. The lines on the cliff face indicate the reduction in the height of the boulders. © M.P. Harris/S. Gear295Scottish Birds:  291–302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 281 a–b. Boulder field on the south side of Da Smaalie, west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21 June2014. © M.P. Harris/S. GearScottish Birds:  291–302296A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 282 a–b. Boulder field at Da Floor of Gamlin, west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21 June 2014.© M.P. Harris/S. Gear297Scottish Birds:  291–302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 283 a–b. Kittiwake and Guillemot colony at West Gaad, north coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21 June2014. © M.P. Harris/S. GearScottish Birds:  291–302298A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 284 a–b. Cliff face at Skirnawilse, west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21 June 2014. © M.P.Harris/S. Gear299Scottish Birds:  291–302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 285 a–b. Guillemot colony in Hol o da Scrudhurdins, Foula, Shetland, 2 July 1974 and 1 July 2014. © M.P.Harris/S. GearScottish Birds:  291–302300A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Plate 286 a–b. Boulder field between Blobrick and Soberlie, north-west coast of Foula, Shetland, 3 July 1974 and 21June 2014. © M.P. Harris/S. Gear301Scottish Birds:  291–302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)Furness (1981b) estimated that in 1976, 65% of Guillemots on Foula bred in boulder fields andcaves, and 35% on cliff and rock ledges. He suggested that at that time there may have been ashortage of optimal nest sites on the island as birds in boulder fields moved awkwardly and haddifficulty reaching the sea if disturbed. The nesting habitat breakdown for Razorbills counted in1976 was 86% in boulder fields, 12% in cliff fissures, 2% on ledges. The census counts suggest areduction of 60% in Guillemot numbers between 1976 and 2007, and of 95% in Razorbills (Table1). However, these figures should be treated with caution due to the extreme difficulty of countingboth species on the island, especially those among boulders and in caves, and Furness suggestedthat the Razorbill population in 1976 was best described as between 5,000 and 15,000 birds.Guillemots and Razorbills cannot be distinguished readily on the photographs, but assumingthose on cliff ledges are Guillemots, there has clearly been a considerable reduction in numbersin areas with no alteration of habitat or competition from other species (Plate 284). Inboulder/cave habitat, MPH estimated between 1,200 and 1,500 Guillemots in the cave at Hol oda Scrudhurdins in July 1974 (Plate 285), and 2,757 were counted there in June 2000 (Harveyet al. 2000). Some were still there in 2014, but a considerable quantity of boulders have beenremoved by the sea at some time, probably since 2000; how often this occurs is unknown, butwould be revealed by photographic monitoring of this apparently unstable habitat. Someboulder fields further above sea level have now been abandoned by auks (Plate 281), whileothers are still occupied but in much reduced numbers (Plate 286).Plate 287. The Foula cliffs from the west, August 2014. © S. GearScottish Birds:  291–302302A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland34:4 (2014)The 1974 photographs were taken at a time of fears over oil developments and the effects of anyoil pollution on seabird populations. Large changes have indeed taken place in seabird numbers onFoula in the 40 years since, but detailed annual monitoring throughout Shetland since the 1970sby Shetland Oil Terminal Environmental Advisory Group, Scottish Natural Heritage, Fair Isle BirdObservatory and others give no support for the view that these developments have been responsiblefor these declines (Dunnet & Heubeck 1995, Heubeck 2000, Heubeck 2006, Miles et al. 2013, Snell& Adlard 2013). Nevertheless, the 2014 photographs illustrate not only population declines, but thatsome habitat change (rock falls and boulder field re-arrangements) and some competition betweenspecies (Gannets vs Guillemots) have occurred. A new census of the breeding seabirds of Britainand Ireland is required urgently, and plans for this are being discussed. While planning actualfieldwork, it would be worthwhile researching what previous photographs of seabird colonies exist,and attempting to replicate them. Such photographs need to be taken into the field in order toreplicate viewing angles, but updating these would provide a useful archive for the future.ReferencesDunnet, G.M. & Heubeck, M. 1995. The monitoring of breeding seabirds and eiders. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 103B: 137–164.Furness, R.W. 1981a. Colonisation of Foula by Gannets. Scottish Birds 11: 211–213.Furness, R.W. 1981b. Seabird populations of Foula. Scottish Birds 11: 237–253.Furness, R.W. 1987. Assessment of the status of seabirds on the island of Foula, Shetland. Unpublished Report, University of Glasgow.Harris, M.P. 1976. The seabirds of Shetland in 1974. Scottish Birds 9: 37–68.Harvey, P.V., Swale, J., Upton, A.J., Gear, J., Gear, S., Adam, M., Churchill, G., Gillham, K. & Skene, A. 2000. A census of the seabirds of Foula - June 2000. Unpublished SNH Report, Lerwick.Heubeck, M. 2000. Population trends of Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle and Common Guillemot Uria aalge in Shetland, 1978–98. Atlantic Seabirds 2: 227–244.Heubeck, M. 2006. The Shetland beached bird survey, 1979–2004. Marine Ornithology 34: 123–127.Mavor, R.A., Parsons, M., Heubeck, M. & Schmitt, S. 2005. Seabird numbers and breeding success in Britain and Ireland, 2004. JNCC, Peterborough. (UK Nature Conservation, No. 29)Miles, W.T.S., Parnaby, D., Cope, R.D., Donohue, T. & Hughes, R.D. 2013. Fair Isle Seabird Studies 2013. Unpublished Report to JNCC, Aberdeen. Snell, K. & Adlard, S. 2013. Noss NNR Annual Report 2013. Unpublished SNH Report, Lerwick.Wanless, S. & Harris, M.P. 2004. European Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis. In: Mitchell, P. I., Newton, S.F., Ratcliffe, N. & Dunn, T.E. (eds.) Seabird populations of Britain and Ireland.146–159. Poyser, London.Martin Heubeck, University of Aberdeen/SOTEAG, c/o Sumburgh Head Lighthouse, Virkie, Shetland ZE3 9JN.Sheila Gear, Foula Heritage, Magdala, Foula, Shetland ZE2 9PN.Michael P. Harris, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB.Revised ms accepted September 2014

A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland

http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/509079/1/N509079JA.pdf

A photographic resurvey of seabird colonies on Foula, Shetland

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

NERC Open Research Archive