Gauntlett-Gilbert, Jeremy

Jordan, Abbie

English

OPUS

        Citation for published version:Gauntlett-Gilbert, J & Jordan, A 2020, 'Fear, boldness and caution: Parent effects on how children managechronic pain', Pain, vol. 161, no. 6, pp. 1127-1128. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001821DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001821Publication date:2020Document VersionPeer reviewed versionLink to publicationPublisher RightsUnspecified© 2020  International Association for the Study of Pain.  The final publication is available at [journal name] viahttps://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001821University of BathAlternative formatsIf you require this document in an alternative format, please contact:openaccess@bath.ac.ukGeneral rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright ownersand it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.Download date: 22. Jun. 2021PAIN Fear, boldness and caution: parent effects on how children manage chronic pain--Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number:Full Title: Fear, boldness and caution: parent effects on how children manage chronic painArticle Type: CommentaryKeywords:Corresponding Author: Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert, Ph.D.Royal United Hospital Bath NHS TrustBath, UNITED KINGDOMCorresponding Author SecondaryInformation:Corresponding Author's Institution: Royal United Hospital Bath NHS TrustCorresponding Author's SecondaryInstitution:First Author: Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert, Ph.D.First Author Secondary Information:Order of Authors: Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert, Ph.D.Abbie Jordan, Ph.D.Additional Information:Question ResponseHave you posted this manuscript on apreprint server (e.g., arXiv.org, BioXriv,PeerJ Preprints)?NoPowered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation   Prof Frank Keefe Editor, PAIN   Dear Prof Keefe,  Re:  Invited Commentary on Birnie et al.  Many thanks for the invitation to submit a commentary on this interesting paper. We hope to have drawn out the paper’s novel and positive aspects, as well as situating it more broadly in the current literature.  We look forward to hearing your view on this submission.  Yours sincerely,  Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert Abbie Jordan  Cover letterFear, boldness and caution: parent effects on how children manage chronic pain  Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert1,2* Abbie Jordan3  1 – Bath Centre for Pain Services, UK 2 – Faculty for Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, UK 3 – Centre for Pain Research & Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK    - * Corresponding author –  Dr Jeremy Gauntlett-Gilbert, Bath Centre for Pain Services, Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK.  jeremy.gauntlett-gilbert@nhs.net; +44 1225 821181   Number of text pages: 3 Number of figures and tables: zero Word count: 925  Title page1    It is well-established that parents affect how children with chronic pain manage their pain and associated disability, yet exactly how that influence happens is not fully understood. There is substantial evidence for ‘intergenerational transmission’ of pain and pain related disability(1), with mothers with chronic pain having children at risk of poorer outcomes across a number of domains(2). Studies have also shown that children of parents with a particular type of pain are more likely to develop similar pain, or other pain diagnoses(3). However, not all children with chronic pain have parents who also experience chronic pain, and it remains important to establish the exact mechanisms of parental influence. The literature on intergenerational transmission has examined a wide range of variables that may pass risk from mother to child(1). However, a number of these mechanisms, such as maternal genetics, prenatal and perinatal influences, are not manipulable in the present moment and consequently, are unable to inform pain treatment. Thus, researchers have worked to establish the role of a number of key parent behavioral variables as potential treatment targets, for example, parent pain catastrophizing(4), pain acceptance (5), and protectiveness(6). However, results have not always been consistent; for example, some studies have shown a role for protectiveness in affecting child pain outcomes(7), whilst other studies have not(8). Birnie and colleagues, in this volume, approach this problem by assuming that the influence of such parent variables may vary in different contexts(9); they may be driven by poor parent health and further moderated by parent pain status and child age.  In particular, they argue that research focus should shift from examining parent pain to all forms of parent ill health, which is a novel aspect of this study.  In their study, Birnie et al. use a conceptually clear clinical model, the Interpersonal Fear-Avoidance Model (IFAM)(7) to examine a centrally important clinical outcome, pain impact in the child.  The IFAM suggests that important sources of child disability – pain catastrophizing and avoidance in the child, for example – are affected by the parent’s attitude and reaction to the child’s pain. Where a parent is catastrophic, hypervigilant and overprotective, their child will likely increase their own anxious reactions to pain, to their detriment.  This interaction between parents and children is evidently complex and multifactorial, often examined with structural equation modelling (SEM).  The sheer number of potential influences can lead investigators to create elaborate models. In contrast, Birnie et al. have stayed close to a theoretical model, the IFAM, and then used a clear and constrained model. There are relatively few variables and paths, and each piece yields information; multiple group comparisons are used rather Manuscript 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 2  than burdening the model with extra variables. Their large dataset, with highly complete data drawn from an adaptive computerised questionnaire system, make this study particularly valuable.  Birnie et al.’s results add support to the IFAM by showing that parent catastrophizing seems to drive child catastrophizing, which in turn worsens pain impact. Parents’ own catastrophising seems to be worse when they themselves report poorer health.  The authors summarise their results as showing that parental health has an indirect effect on child pain impact that is mediated by parent catastrophizing. However, despite the authors’ interest in parental health, the results also to point to the centrality of behavioural and psychological factors.  Specifically, parent catastrophizing seems to the key mechanism of negative effects and there is nothing about a parent simply being less healthy, for example, that leads to them acting more protectively towards their child (the latter again being related to parent catastrophizing).  The analysis of child age and parent pain status, as moderators of IFAM mechanisms, yields interesting results. Parent protectiveness was found to be more unhelpful in adolescents, compared to younger children, perhaps due to its limiting influence on adolescent autonomy. However, the actual size of the effects across age was similar, and small. Looking at parent pain status, the negative effects of parent ill health and child catastrophizing were relevant in both groups, but surprisingly stronger where parents did not report pain. This raises the interesting possibility that pain catastrophizing may be more potent, for the parent and the child, when pain is more unfamiliar in the family.  The results of Birnie and colleagues’ study emphasise that even the most powerful and familiar parent variables, such as catastrophizing and protectiveness, may have quite different influences in different family and developmental contexts. Attention to such moderators of parent effects may increase replicability of results in this literature. Consequently, it is critical that future studies of parent influence explore child age as a moderator variable. It may also be that the severity and nature of the child’s condition will change parent influence. Parent effects are sometimes studied in diverse and contrasting pediatric pain populations. For example, Cordts et al. recently studied parents of children with an average pain of 4.1/10, where 63% were experiencing headache(8); in contrast, Kemani et al.’s population reported much higher pain at 7.3/10 with <15% with headache(10). It is not clear that such populations are comparable or whether we would predict identical parent effects in both. Inconsistent reporting of variables that characterise the severity or duration of a population’s problems can also make it hard to compare research findings. For example, Birnie et al. report pain duration but not pain intensity for their participants, whereas Cordts et al. report the opposite. Future investigators should ideally include details of the child’s  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 3  pain intensity, duration, and functional impact. Such details, along with moderator analyses of child age and parent characteristics, may help to explain inconsistencies in previous research results.    Conflict of interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.  [Acknowledgements – none]   References:   1.  Stone AL, Wilson AC. Transmission of risk from parents with chronic pain to offspring: An integrative conceptual model. Pain. 2016;157(12) p. 2628–39.  2.  Higgins KS, Birnie KA, Chambers CT, Wilson AC, Caes L, Clark AJ, et al. Offspring of parents with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain, health, psychological, and family outcomes. Pain. 2015 Nov 1;156(11):2256–66.  3.  McKillop H, Banez G. A Broad Consideration of Risk Factors in Pediatric Chronic Pain: Where to Go from Here? Children. 2016;3(4):38.  4.  Goubert L, Eccleston C, Vervoort T, Jordan A, Crombez G. Parental catastrophizing about their child’s pain. The parent version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS-P): A preliminary validation. Pain. 2006;123(3):254–63.  5.  McCracken LM, Gauntlett-Gilbert J. Role of psychological flexibility in parents of adolescents with chronic pain: Development of a measure and preliminary correlation analyses. Pain. 2011;152(4):780–5.  6.  Claar RL, Simons LE, Logan DE. Parental response to children’s pain: The moderating impact of children’s emotional distress on symptoms and disability. Pain. 2008;138(1):172–9.  7.  Simons LE, Smith A, Kaczynski K, Basch M. Living in fear of your child’s pain: the Parent Fear of Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 2015 Apr 1;156(4):694–702.  8.  Poppert Cordts KM, Stone AL, Beveridge JK, Wilson AC, Noel M. The (Parental) Whole Is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts: A Multifactorial Model of Parent Factors in Pediatric Chronic Pain. J Pain. 2019;20(7):786–95.  9.  Birnie KA, Heathcote LC, Bhandari RP, Feinstein A, Yoon IA, Simons LE. Parent physical and mental health contributions to interpersonal fear avoidance. Pain.  10.  Kemani MK, Kanstrup M, Jordan A, Caes L, Gauntlett-Gilbert J. Evaluation of an Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment Based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adolescents With Chronic Pain and Their Parents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018;43(9):981–94.    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65   Copyright Transfer Agreement--REQUIRED from ALL authors ofsubmission at revision stageClick here to access/downloadCopyright Transfer Agreement--REQUIRED from ALLauthors of submission at revision stageGG and Jordan commentary on Birnie PAIN copyrightform.pdfPlease wait...   If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.   You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting  http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.   For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit  http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.   Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.ICMJE Conflict of Interest Form--REQUIRED from ALL authors ofsubmission at revision stage

Fear, boldness and caution: Parent effects on how children manage chronic pain

Crossref

https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/files/203738628/PAIN_commentary_submitted_17_1_2020.pdf

Fear, boldness and caution: Parent effects on how children manage chronic pain

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

OPUS

Crossref

OPUS