Granhag, P.

Porter, S.

Vrij, Aldert

English

Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure)

13). Can fMRI really tell if you are lying? Scientific American. Retrieved September 23, 2010, from http://www. scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?idnew-lie-detector

5). Looking for the lie. The New York Times. Retrieved

A critical analysis of the behavioral adaptation explanation of the probing effect.

A few can catch a liar, sometimes.

A few can catch a liar.

A further investigation of the cognitive interference hypothesis of gaze patterns during conversation.

A German perspective on children’s testimony. In

A history of lie detection.

A hypothesis-confirming bias in labelling effects.

A look tells all.

A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mindreading.

Accuracy of deception judgements.

Adaptation and communicative design: Patterns of interaction in truthful and deceptive conversations.

An empirical test of the Behaviour Analysis Interview.

Associate retrieval processes in free recall.

Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.

Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt.

Behavioral correlates of deception in a simulated police interview.

Behavioural adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect.

Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans.

Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom?

Believed cues to deception: Judgments in self-generated serious and trivial situations.

Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen [Evaluation of the credibility of statements].

Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.

Blinded by emotion? Effect of emotionality of a scene on susceptibility to false memories.

Can behavioral adaptation explain the probing effect?

Can intuition improve deception detection performance?

Can you remember what was in your pocket when you were stung by a bee?’’—Eliciting cues to deception by asking the unanticipated.

Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection.

Children’s concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children’s eyewitness testimony. In

Children’s prepared and unprepared lies: Can adults see through their strategies?

Children’s use of gaze and limb movement cues to infer deception.

Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies.

Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in deception detection.

Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception.

Come to think of it...’’: Interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection.

Communication patterns in Indians: Verbal and nonverbal. Sexual Abuse:

communication.

Completing Coyne’s cycle: Dysphorics’ ability to detect deception.

Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions.

Confounding influences on police detection of suspiciousness.

Conversational hand gestures and facial displays in face-to-face dialogue. In

Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony.

Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis.

Credibility of the emotional witness: A comparison of ratings by laypersons and court judges.

Criminal identity deception and deception detection in law enforcement.

Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies.

Criteria-based content analysis: An experimental investigation. Paper presented at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advanced Study Institute on the ChildWitness in Context: Cognitive, Social and Legal Perspectives,

Crosscultural police–citizen interactions: The influence of race, beliefs and nonverbal communication on impression formation.

Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.

Cues to deception.

Cultural patterns in Dutch and Surinam nonverbal behavior: An analysis of simulated police/citizen encounters.

Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom.

Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability.

Deceit, distrust and the social milieu: Application of deception research in a troubled world.

Deception among pairs: ‘‘Let’s say we had lunch together and hope they will swallow it.’’

Deception detection expertise.

Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In

Deception detection: Interrogators’ and observers’ decoding of consecutive statements.

Deception, lying, and demeanor. In

Deception: A social lubricant and a selfish act. In

Deceptive realities: Sender, receiver, and observer perspectives in deceptive conversations.

Deceptive responses: The impact of verbal and nonverbal countermeasures.

Decoding discrepant nonverbal cues.

Demeanor and credibility.

Detecting deceit in pairs of children.

Detecting deceit of the motivated liar.

Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults.

Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior.

Detecting deceit: Current issues. In

Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence.

Detecting deception: The benefit of looking at a combination of behavioral, auditory and speech content related cues in a systematic manner.

Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. (2nd ed.).

Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior.

Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect deceit.

Development of gaze aversion as disengagement of visual information.

Die Situation der forensischen Aussagenpsychologie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials

Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavioral analysis interviews.

Discrepancy as a cue to actual and perceived deception.

Do gestures communicate? A review.

do lie-catchers fail? A Brunswikian lens model of human lie judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool.

Effect of awareness on an indicator of cognitive load.

Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions.

Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies.

Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving.

Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils.

Epilogue: Where are we going, and how do we get there?

Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/ avoidance behaviors.

Evaluation of a brief deception detection training program.

Explanations for visual cue primacy in judgments of honesty and deceit.

Expressiveness and expressive control.

Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit.

Facial appearance and criminality. In

False suspicion and the misperception of deceit.

Feelings of confidence and the realism of confidence judgments in everyday life. In

First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face.

From flawed self-assessment to blatant whoppers: The utility of voluntary and involuntary behavior in detecting deception.

from http://www.scientificamerican. com/article.cfm?ida-look-tells-all

Gaze and eye contact: A research review.

Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection

Name not available

https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/services/downloadRegister/112413/PSPI_article_Vrij,_Granhag_and_Porter.pdf

Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Portsmouth University Research Portal (Pure)

Name not available